DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Extreme pH Reduced Vegetative Growth and Biomass Accumulation in Alfalfa

  • Lee, Ki-Won (Grassland & Forages Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Hoon (Grassland & Forages Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Song, Yowook (Grassland & Forages Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Ji, Hee Jung (Grassland & Forages Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Yong (Grassland & Forages Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Choi, Gi Jun (Grassland & Forages Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lim, Eun A (Grassland & Forages Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Rahman, Md. Atikur (Grassland & Forages Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Received : 2019.08.21
  • Accepted : 2019.09.10
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

Soil acidity or alkalinity are serious limitations for crop production. The purpose of this study was to clarify the negative effects of extreme pH stress (low and high) on alfalfa vegetative growth (VG) and biomass accumulation (BA). Two-week-old alfalfa seedlings were exposed to different pH (4.0, 4.5, 7.0, 8.0 and 8.5, respectively) levels for 72 hours. Alfalfa grown at pH 4.0 and 8.5 significantly reduced VG and BA, wherein as neutral pH (7.0) comparably exhibited better growth and biomass yield. These results indicate that extreme acidic or alkaline level are critical limiting factors for growth and biomass yield in alfalfa.

Keywords

References

  1. Evans, M. 2010. Soil pH critical for forage and grazing success. Progressive Forage, Indiana Forage Council.
  2. Kochian, L.V., Pineros, M.A., Liu, J. and Magalhaes, J.V. 2015. Plant adaptation to acid soils: the molecular basis forcrop aluminum resistance. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 66:571-598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-114822
  3. Lee, K.-W., Rahman, M.A., Kim, K.-Y., Choi, G.J., Cha, J.-Y., Cheong, M.S., Shohael, A.M., Jones, C. and Lee, S.-H. 2018. Overexpression of the alfalfa DnaJ-like protein (MsDJLP) gene enhances tolerance to chilling and heat stresses in transgenic tobacco plants. Turkish Journal of Biology. 42:12-22. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1705-30
  4. Lee, K.W., Rahman, M.A., Choi, G.J., Kim, K.Y., Ji, H.C., Hwang, T.Y. and Lee, S.H. 2017a. Expression of small heat shock protein23 enhanced heat stress tolerance in transgenic alfalfa plants. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 27:1238-1244.
  5. Lee, K.W., Rahman, M.A., Choi, G.J., Kim, K.Y., Ji, H.C., Kim, J.G. and Lee, S.H. 2017b. Identification of cold and heat-induced differentially expressed genes in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) leaves. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 27:1231-1237.
  6. Li, W., Wei, Z., Qiao, Z., Wu, Z., Cheng, L. and Wang, Y. 2013. Proteomics analysis of alfalfa response to heat stress. PLoS ONE. 8:e82725. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082725
  7. McCauley, A., Jones, C. and Jacobsen, J. 2009. Soil pH and organic matter. Nutrient Management Module. 8:1-12.
  8. Putnam, D., Russelle, M., Orloff, S., Kuhn, J., Fitzhugh, L., Godfrey, L., Kiess, A. and Long, R. 2001. Alfalfa, wildlife and the environment. In: The Importance and Benefit of Alfalfa in the 21st Century, California Alfalfa and Forage Association. pp. 1-24.
  9. Rahman, M.A., Kim, Y.-G., and Lee, B.-H. 2014. Proteomic response of alfalfa subjected to aluminum (Al) stress at low pH soil. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 34:262-268. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2014.34.4.262
  10. Rahman, M.A., Alam, I., Kim, Y.-G., Ahn, N.-Y., Heo, S.-H., Lee, D.-G., Liu, G. and Lee, B.-H. 2015. Screening for salt-responsive proteins in two contrasting alfalfa cultivars using a comparative proteome approach. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 89: 112-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.02.015
  11. Rahman, M.A., Kim Y.-G., Alam, I., Liu G., Lee, H., Lee, J.J. and Lee, B.-H. 2016. Proteome analysis of alfalfa roots in response to water deficit stress. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 15:1275-1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61255-2
  12. Rahman, M.A., Lee, S.-H., Ji, H.C., Kabir, A.H., Jones, C.S. and Lee, K.-W. 2018. Importance of mineral nutrition for mitigating aluminum toxicity in plants on acidic soils: current status and opportunities. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 19:3073. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103073
  13. Soil Survey Division Staff. 2017. Examination and Description of Soil Profiles. In Soil survey manual,US Department of Agriculture Handbook 18; Soil Survey Division Staff, Ed.; US Department of Agriculture: Washington DC, USA. pp. 83-230.
  14. Suriyan, C.U., Supaibulwattana, K. and Kirdmanee, C. 2009. Comparative effects of salt stress and extreme pH stress combined on glycinebetaine accumulation, photosynthetic abilities and growth characters of two rice genotypes. Rice Science. 16:274-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6308(08)60091-8
  15. Wang, X., Geng, S., Ri, Y.J., Cao, D., Liu, J., Shi, D. and Yang, C. 2011. Physiological responses and adaptive strategies of tomato plants to salt and alkali stresses. Scientia Horticulturae. 130:248-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.07.006
  16. Yang, C., Xu, H., Wang, L., Liu, J., Shi, D. and Wang, D. 2009. Comparative effects of salt stress and alkali-stress on the growth, photosynthesis, solute accumulation, and ion balance of barley plants. Photosynthetica. 47:79-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-009-0013-8