참고문헌
- Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res, 60, 72-84, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.01.003
- Boening KW, Wolf BH, schmidt AE. Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent, 84, 419-424, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.109125
- Choi HS, Cho JH. Assessment of the fit of zirconia-based prostheses fabricated with two different scan methods. J Adv Prosthodont, 55, 135-143, 2017.
- Duret F, Preston J. CAD/CAM imaging in dentistry. Curr Opin Dent, 1.2, 150-154, 1991.
- Flugge TV, schlager S, Nelson K. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, 471-478, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.017
- Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent, 62, 405-408, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
- Holden JE, Goldstein GR, Hittelman EL. Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations. J Prosthodont, 18, 645-648, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00497.x
- Jeon JH, Choi BY, Kim CM. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white-and blue-light scanners. J Prosthet Dent, 114, 549-553, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.019
- Kokubo Y, Tsumita M, Kano T. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of zirconia all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthodont Res, 55, 40-43, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2010.09.001
- Lee JH. Digital approach to a ceramic-pressedto-metal restoration. J Prosthet Dent, 115, 141-144, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.016
- Laurent M, scheer P, Dejou J. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crownsvalidation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil, 35, 116-122, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2003.01203.x
- Marcel TJ. Three-dimensional on-screen virtual models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 119, 666-668, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.116502
- McLean J. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br dent j, 131, 107-111, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
- Nawafleh NA, Mack F, Evans J. Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: a literature review. J Prosthodont, 22, 419-428, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12006
- Ortorp A, Jonsson D, Mouhsen A, et al. The fit of cobaltchromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: A comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater, 27, 356-363, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.015
- Ostlund LE. Cavity design and mathematics: their effect on gaps at the margins of cast restorations. Oper Dent, 10, 122-137, 1985.
- Persson AS, Oden A, Andersson M. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater, 25, 929-936, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.100
- Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod, 74, 298-303, 2004.
- Reich S, Kappe K, Teschner H. Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral sci, 116, 579-584, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00580.x
- Ting-shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthodont, 24, 313-321, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12218
- Trost L, Stines S, Burt L. Making informed decisions about incorporating a CAD/CAM system into dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc, 137, 32-36, 2006.
- Vojdani M, Torabi K, Atashkar B. A comparison of the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium copings fabricated by two different CAD/CAM Systems (CAD/Milling, CAD/Ceramill Sintron). J Dent, 17, 301, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(89)90047-X
- Wagner C, Stock V, Merk S. Retention Load of Telescopic Crowns with Different Taper Angles between Cobalt-Chromium and Polyetheretherketone Made with Three Different Manufacturing Processes Examined by Pull-Off Test. J Prosthodont, 27, 162-168, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12482