DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Time Dependent Diffusion for Prediction Service Life in NPPs Safety Related Concrete Structures

원전 안전관련 콘크리트 구조물의 수명예측을 위한 재령계수에 대한 연구

  • Received : 2019.04.04
  • Accepted : 2019.04.15
  • Published : 2019.05.01

Abstract

Nuclear power plant concrete structures are in contact with the coast, and durability due to chloride attack is very important because it is used as cooling water by taking seawater. For this purpose, a 3-year long-term saltwater immersion test was carried out to evaluate chloride ion diffusion coefficient and age apponent (m) The m values of the foundation with 4,000 class was 0.35 ~ 0.39, similar to KCI or ACI suggested values. essential service water constructions and tunnels of 5,000 class were 0.44 ~ 0.53 and 6,000 class, and 0.62 of reactor containment buildings were similar to the proposed values of FIB. As a result of the prediction of the service life with the measured age coefficient, all the safety related concrete structures of the nuclear power plants satisfied the service life of more than 60 years.

원자력발전소 콘크리트 구조물은 해안가에 접해 있으며, 해수를 취수하여 냉각수로 사용하기 때문에 염해에 의한 내구성은 매우 중요하다. 이를 위해 3년간의 염해 장기침지시험을 실시하여 염화물이온확산계수의 변화 및 재령계수(m)을 평가한 결과 4,000 Class인 구조물 기초의 m은 0.35~0.39로 KCI나 ACI 제안값과 유사한 결과를 나타내었고 5,000 Class인 필수 냉각수 구조물 및 터널은 0.44~0.53, 6,000 Class인 원자로 격납건물은 0.62로 FIB 제안값과 유사하였다. 실측된 재령계수로 내구수명을 예측한 결과 원전의 모든 안전관련 콘크리트 구조물은 설계수명 60년 이상을 만족하는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. M. Shakouri, D. Trejo (2017), A time-variant model of surface chloride build-up for improved service life predictions, Cem. Concr. Compos. 84, 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.08.008
  2. M. Choinska, A. Khelidj, G. Chatzigeorgiou, G. Pijaudier-Cabot (2007), Effects and interactions of temperature and stress-level related damage on permeability of concrete, Cem. Concr. Res. 37(1) 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.09.015
  3. J. Wang, P.A.M. Basheer, S.V. Nanukuttan, et al. (2016), Influence of service loading and the resulting micro-cracks on chloride resistance of concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 108 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.005
  4. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Corporation (2015), Evaluation Shinhanul 1,2 Nuclear Power Plant Concrete Durability Report, 02.
  5. M. Collepardi, A. Marcialis, R. Turriziani (1972), Penetration of chloride ions into cement pastes and concretes, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 55 (10) 534-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1972.tb13424.x
  6. K. Takewaka, S. Mastumoto (1988), Quality and cover thickness of concrete based on the estimation of chloride penetration in marine environments, ACI Sp. Pub. 109 (17) 381-400.
  7. P.S. Mangat, B.T. Molloy (1994), Prediction of long term chloride concentration in concrete, Mater. Struct. 27 (6) 338-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02473426
  8. M. Maage, S. Helland, E. Poulsen, et al. (1996), Service life prediction of existing concrete structures exposed to marine environment, ACI Mater. J. 93 602-608.
  9. Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport (MLIT) (2009), Concrete Standard Specification Appendix II Evaluation Concrete Durability, 637-672
  10. ACI Committee 365 (2000), Service Life Prediction State of the Art Report
  11. CEB-FIP, (2006) Model Code for Service Life Design, The International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib), Task Group 5.6, 16-33.
  12. Kim, H. J.(2012). Nuclear Safety and Regulation, 573.
  13. Korea Electric Power Inderstry Code (2010), SN Nuclear Safety Related Structures, SMB Concrete Containments, 10-12.
  14. ASTM C 150 (2018), Standard Specification for Portland Cement
  15. ASTM C 618 (2019), Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete
  16. ASTM C 33 (2018), Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates
  17. ASTM C 494 (2017), Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete