Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집)

Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic Fragility Evaluation of Cable Supported Bridges Based on Probability Distribution Using Safety Factors of Structural Members

안전율 확률분포에 근거한 케이블지지교량 주요부재의 내진성능 취약도 평가

  • 박진우 (한국시설안전공단 특수교관리센터) ;
  • 김창성 ((주)이노웍) ;
  • 김두기 (군산대학교 토목공학과)
  • Received : 2018.12.05
  • Accepted : 2019.06.12
  • Published : 2019.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to rationally determine the priority of seismic reinforcement of main(key) members of bridges. Cable Supported bridge was selected as the evaluation target and the reliability based on the probability distribution was used to evaluate the seismic fragility of the key members as a quantitative indicator. The safety factor, which is a random variable, is considered an artificial (fixed load and live load) load and a natural (earthquake, wind, temperature, etc.) load. The seismic load is applied as a possible earthquake during the lifetime of the bridge. From analyzing the fragility of each key member based on the seismic reliability, it can be concluded that the shoe (23.8%) was the most fragile, where the other members are ranked as place concrete (20.5%), pier (18.9%), foundation (17.3%) and cable (5.0%) respectively.

이 연구에서는 교량 주요부재의 내진보강 우선순위를 합리적으로 결정하는데 그 목적이 있다. 평가대상으로 케이블 교량을 선정하였으며 정량적 지표인 주요부재의 취약도를 평가하기 위해 확률분포에 근거한 신뢰도를 활용하였다. 확률변수인 안전계수는 주하중(고정하중, 활하중)과 부하중(지진, 내풍, 온도 등)을 고려하였고 지진하중은 교량의 사용수명 동안 발생 가능한 진진을 적용하였다. 이러한 신뢰도를 근간으로 각 주요부재의 취약도 점유율을 확인한 결과 받침(23.8%)이 가장 취약하였으며 받침콘크리트(20.5%), 교각(18.9%), 기초(17.3%), 보강형(14.6%), 케이블(5.0%) 순으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ang, A. H-S., and Tang, W. H. (2011), Probability Concepts In Engineering, Goomibook, Seoul, 105-194.
  2. Cho, H. N., Kang, K. K., and Cha, C. J. (2005), Reliability-Based Managing Criteria for Cable Tension Force in Cable-stayed Bridges, Journal of Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, KSMI, 9(3), 129-138(in Korean, with English abstract).
  3. Haldar, A. (2006), Recent Developments in Reliability-Based Civil Engineering, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, Singapore By Mainlar, 77-98.
  4. Haldar, A., and Mahadevan, S. (2000), Probability Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 63-68.
  5. Iksan regional office for construction and management (IROCM) (2016), Seismic performance evaluation and reinforcement design of bridges including National highway No. 27, Ministry of land, infrastructure and transport (MOLIT), written in Korean.
  6. Jeong, Y. S., Kim, W. S., Lee, I. K., and Lee, J. H. (2016), Development of Bridge Inspection Reliability and Improvement Strategy, Journal of Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, KSMI, 20(5), 50-57(in Korean, with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2016.20.5.050
  7. Kim, D. K. (2017), Dynamics of Structures, Goomibook, Seoul, 333-348.
  8. Kim, S. Y. (2016), Correlation Effect of Maintenances on Probabilistic Service Life Management, Journal of Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, KSMI, 20(1), 48-55(in Korean, with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2016.20.1.048
  9. Korea infrastructure safety and technology corporation (KISTEC) (1999), Seismic Performance Evaluation and Reinforcement of Existing Bridges, Korea infrastructure safety and technology corporation (KISTEC), written in Korea.
  10. Kwak, J. M. (2013), Research and Statistical Analysis, Informa, Seoul, 49-64.
  11. Lee, H. S., and Kwon, S. J. (2018), Probabilistic Analysis of Repairing Cost Considering Random Variables of Durability Design Parameters for Chloride Attack, Journal of Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, KSMI, 22(1), 32-39(in Korean, with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.11112/JKSMI.2018.22.1.032
  12. Lee, S. W., and Kim, S. H. (2004), Retrofit Measures Based on Seismic Retrofit Priority of Existing Bridges, Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Soiety of Korea, EESK, 8(3), 77-86.
  13. Ministry of land, infrastructure and transport (MOLIT) (2016), Korean highway bridge design code (limit state design), written in Korean.
  14. Ministry of land, infrastructure and transport(MOLIT) (2015), Evaluation of seismic performance of existing structures (bridges) Commentary and Examples, Korea infrastructure safety and technology corporation (KISTEC), written in Korea.
  15. Park, J. W., Choo, J. H., Park, G. R., Hwang, I. B., and Shin, Y. S. (2015), The Evaluation of Non-Destructive Formulas on Compressive Strength Using the Reliability Based on Probability, Journal of Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, KSMI, 19(4), 25-34(in Korean, with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2015.19.4.025
  16. Park, K. S., Ju, H. S., Choi, H. C., and Kim, I. H. (2009), Advanced Seismic Retrofit Priority Decision For Seismic Performance Estimation of Existing Bridges, Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Soiety of Korea, EESK, 13(6), 47-57.
  17. Williams, R. (2005), Electrical Engineering Probability, Inter Vision, Seoul, 259-281.
  18. Yang, Y. S., Seo, Y. S., and Lee, J. O. (1999), Structural Reliability Engineering, Seoul National University Press, Seoul, 47-68.