DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correlation between the Diaphragmatic Contraction Pressure and the Slow Vital Capacity

  • Lee, Jae-Seok (Department of Physical Therapy, Silla University) ;
  • Han, Dong-Wook (Department of Physical Therapy, Silla University) ;
  • Kang, Tae-Wook (Department of Physical Therapy, Walk Rehabilitation Hospital)
  • Received : 2019.05.29
  • Accepted : 2019.06.19
  • Published : 2019.08.31

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study measured the external pressure on abdomen during maximal inspiration. The study determined the correlation between the diaphragmatic contraction pressure and the lung capacities to verify whether or not the measured pressure values can represent diaphragmatic contractility. METHODS: The study included 32 healthy subjects (16 males and 16 females). The researchers fabricated their own diaphragmatic pressure belt (DiP Belt) to measure DCP. DiP Belt device was fixed on the front of the abdomen and the diaphragmatic contractility was measured during maximal inspiration. The lung capacities were measured using a portable digital spirometer device (Pony Fx, COSMED, Italy). A digital spirometer is a device that is used to test the flow of air entering and exiting the lungs. RESULTS: DCP showed significant positive correlations with vital capacity (VC), inspiratory reserve volume (IRV) and inspiratory capacity (IC). Among values of lung capacities, IC showed especially strong positive correlations with the DCP (r =.714, p<.010). For the males, DCP showed significant positive correlations with IRV and IC, and DCP showed significant negative correlation with the expiratory reserve volume (ERV). For the females, DCP showed significant positive correlation with tidal volume (VT), but any significant correlation was not found with any of the other values of lung capacities. CONCLUSION: DCP showed high correlations with IRV and IC associated with inspiratory capacity. Therefore, The DiP Belt can be looked upon as a simple device that is very useful for measuring diaphragmatic contractility.

Keywords

References

  1. De Troyer A, Boriek AM. Mechanics of the respiratory muscles. Compr Physiol. 2011;1(3):1273-300. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c100009
  2. Simoes RP, Castello V, Auad MA, et al. Prevalence of reduced respiratory muscle strength in institutionalized elderly people. Sao Paulo Med J. 2009;127(2):78-83. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31802009000200005
  3. Laghi F, Tobin MJ. Disorders of the respiratory muscles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168(1):10-48. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.2206020
  4. Kim M, Lee K, Cho J, et al. Diaphragm Thickness and Inspiratory Muscle Functions in Chronic Stroke Patients. Med Sci Monit. 2017;11(23):1247-53.
  5. Dres M, Goligher EC, Heunks LMA, et al. Critical illness-associated diaphragm weakness. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(10):1441-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4928-4
  6. ATS/ERS (American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society) Statement on respiratory muscle testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(4):518-624. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.166.4.518
  7. Cardenas LZ, Santana PV, Caruso P, et al. Diaphragmatic Ultrasound Correlates with Inspiratory Muscle Strength and Pulmonary Function in Healthy Subjects. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018;44(4):786-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.11.020
  8. Santana PV, Prina E, Albuquerque AL, et al. Identifying decreased diaphragmatic mobility and diaphragm thickening in interstitial lung disease: the utility of ultrasound imaging. J Bras Pneumol. 2016;42(2):88-94. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37562015000000266
  9. Laroche CM, Carroll N, Moxham J, et al. Clinical significance of severe isolated diaphragm weakness. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;138(4):862-6. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/138.4.862
  10. Steier J, Kaul S, Seymour J, et al. The value of multiple tests of respiratory muscle strength. Thorax. 2007;62(11):975-80. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2006.072884
  11. Caruso P, Albuquerque AL, Santana PV, et al. Diagnostic methods to assess inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength. J Bras Pneumol. 2015;41(2):110-23. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37132015000004474
  12. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(2):319-38. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.05.00034805
  13. Rocha FR, Bruggemann AK, Francisco DS, et al. Diaphragmatic mobility: relationship with lung function, respiratory muscle strength, dyspnea, and physical activity in daily life in patients with COPD. J Bras Pneumol. 2017;43(1):32-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-37562016000000097
  14. Paulin E, Yamaguti WP, Chammas MC, et al. Influence of diaphragmatic mobility on exercise tolerance and dyspnea in patients with COPD. Respir Med. 2007;101(10):2113-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2007.05.024
  15. LoMauro A, Aliverti A. Sex differences in respiratory function. Breathe. 2018;14(2):131-140. https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.000318
  16. Sawaya Y, Ishizaka M, Kubo A, et al. Correlation between skeletal muscle mass index and parameters of respiratory function and muscle strength in young healthy adults according to gender. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018;30(12):1424-7. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.1424
  17. Bellemare F, Jeanneret A, Couture J. Sex differences in thoracic dimensions and configuration. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168(3):305-12. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200208-876OC
  18. Kantarci F, Mihmanli I, Demirel MK, et al. Normal diaphragmatic motion and the effects of body composition: determination with M-mode sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2004;23(2):255-60. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2004.23.2.255
  19. Boussuges A, Gole Y, Blanc P. Diaphragmatic motion studied by m-mode ultrasonography: methods, reproducibility, and normal values. Chest. 2009;135(2):391-400. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-1541
  20. Ragnarsdottir M, Kristinsdottir EK. Breathing movements and breathing patterns among healthy men and women 20-69 years of age. Reference values. Respiration. 2006;73(1):48-54. https://doi.org/10.1159/000087456
  21. Kaneko H, Horie J. Breathing movements of the chest and abdominal wall in healthy subjects. Respir Care. 2012;57(9):1442-51. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01655