대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학 (Journal of radiological science and technology)

  • 제42권4호
  • /
  • Pages.291-299
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2288-3509(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-1168(eISSN)
대한방사선과학회 (Korean Society of Radiological Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

IEC 규정 노출지수를 활용한 디지털 방사선 영상시스템에서의 영상 수용체간 특성평가 (I)

Evaluation of Image Receptor Characteristics in Computed Radiography System Using Exposure Index in International Electrotechnical Commission (I)

  • 박혜민 (고려대학교 보건안전융합과학과) ;
  • 윤용수 (규슈대학교 의학연구원 보건학부문) ;
  • 노영훈 (오송첨단의료기기개발지원센터 제품개발부 바이오융합팀) ;
  • 김성준 (고려대학교 보건안전융합과학과) ;
  • 나찬영 (고려대학교 보건안전융합과학과) ;
  • 한태호 (고려대학교 보건안전융합과학과) ;
  • 김정수 (대구보건대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 정회원 (백석문화대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 김정민 (고려대학교 보건안전융합과학과)
  • Park, Hyemin (Department of Health and Safety Convergence Science, Korea University) ;
  • Yoon, Yongsu (Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University) ;
  • Roh, Younghoon (Integrated Medical Technology Team, Department of Research and Development, Medical Device Development Center, Osong Medical Innovation Foundation) ;
  • Kim, Sungjun (Department of Health and Safety Convergence Science, Korea University) ;
  • Na, Chanyoung (Department of Health and Safety Convergence Science, Korea University) ;
  • Han, Taeho (Department of Health and Safety Convergence Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Jungsu (Department of Radiologic Technology, Daegu Health College) ;
  • Jeong, hoiwoun (Department of Radiological Science, Baekseok Culture University) ;
  • Kim, Jungmin (Department of Health and Safety Convergence Science, Korea University)
  • 투고 : 2019.06.24
  • 심사 : 2019.08.27
  • 발행 : 2019.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) has regulated the definition and requirements of the exposure index (EI). In this study, we calculated the EI of several image receptors in digital radiography system of two different manufacturers according to the method as per IEC, and evaluated the relationship with incident air kerma. To calculate the EI, w e obtained the characteristics curve of each image receptor by increasing the incident air kerma at RQA 3, 5, 7 and 9, respectively. As a result, there was no significant difference in the EI values between different image receptors of the same manufacturer, but EI values of different manufacturer was different despite the same air kerma was incident. Therefore, understanding the characteristics of the digital radiography systems is important in order to use EI as a tool for measuring and managing the radiation dose.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Doi K. Diagnostic image over the last 50 years: research and development in medical imaging science and technology. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:R5-R27. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/13/R02
  2. Seo DN, Jang SG, Kim JM, Kim JS, Sung DW, Kim HJ, et al. A comparative assesment of entrance surface doses in analogue and digital radiography during common radiographic examinations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2014;158:22-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nct189
  3. Kim JS, Seo DN, Choi IS. National data analysis of general radiography projection method in medical imaging. J Korean Soc Radiolo. 2014;37:169-75.
  4. Yoon YS, Kim HJ, Park MS, Kim JS, Seo DN, Choi IS, et al. Monte Carlo simulation-based feasibility sudy of a dose-area product meter built into a collimator for diagnostic X-ray. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2014;162:421-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nct339
  5. Seibert JA, Morin RL. The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41:573-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1954-6
  6. Shepard SJ, Wang J, Flynn M, Gingold E, Goldman L, Krugh K, et al. An exposure indication for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (Executive Summary). Med Phys. 2009;36:2898-914. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3121505
  7. IE 60601-1-3, Ed 2.0. Medical e lectrical equipment - Part 1-3: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Radiation protection in diagnostic X-ray equipment. International Electrotechnical Commission; 2008.
  8. Lee HS, Han SG, Roh YH, Lim HJ, Kim JM, Kim JU. Performance evaluation of domestic prototype dose area product meter SFT-1. J Radio Sci Technol. 2016;39:435-41. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2016.39.3.19
  9. Kim JS, Lee JH, Jung HK, Kim JM, Cho BR. Patient radiation dose values during interventional cardiology examinations in University Hospital, Korea. J Radiol Sci Technol. 2016;39:27-33. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2016.39.1.04
  10. Kim JS, Yoon YS, Seo DN, Kwon SM, Shim JN, Kim JM. Real-time patient radiation dose monitoring system used in a large university hospital. Journal of Digit Imaging. 2016;29:627-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9880-2
  11. Kim JS, Seo DN, Choi IS, Nam SR, Yoon YS, Kim HJ, et al. Development of diagnostic reference levels using a real-time radiation dose monitoring system at a cardiovascular center in Korea. Journal of Digit Imaging. 2015;28:684-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9773-9
  12. AAPM REPORT NO.116. An exposure indicator for digital radiography. American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2009.
  13. Moore QT, Don S, Goske MJ, Strauss KJ, Cohen M, Herrmann T. Image gently: using exposure indicators to improve pediatric digital radiography. Radiol Technol. 2012;84:93-9.
  14. Yasumatsu S, Tanaka N, Iwase K, Shimizu Y, Morishita J. Effect of X-ray beam quality on determination of exposure index. Radiol Phys Technol. 2016;9:109-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-015-0340-3
  15. IEC 62494-1, Ed 1.0. Medical e lectrical e quipment - Exposure index of digital X-ray imaging system - Part 1: Definitions and requirements for general radiography. International Electrotechnical Commission; 2008.
  16. IEC 61267, Ed 1.0. Medical diagnostic X-ray equipment - Radiation conditions for use in the determination of characteristics. International Electrotechnical Commission; 1994.
  17. Kunitomo H. Concept and application method of new index "exposure index: EI" for dose evaluation between devices. Innervision. 2012;27:14-8.
  18. Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 8th Edition. United States of America: Cengage Learning; 2015.
  19. Kong KA. Statistical methods: reliability assessment and method comparison. Ewha Med J. 2017; 40(1):9-16. https://doi.org/10.12771/emj.2017.40.1.9
  20. Jeong HW, Min JW. A Case Study of Application of Exposure Index in Computed Radiography by Using Human Chest Phantom. J Radio Sci Technol. 2018;41(6):533-8. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2018.41.6.533