DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Psychological Ownership, Self-leadership, and Social Exchange Relationships on Innovative Behavior of Military Hospital Personnel

심리적 주인의식, 셀프리더십, 사회적 교환관계가 군병원 종사자의 혁신행동에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2019.05.16
  • Accepted : 2019.08.06
  • Published : 2019.08.30

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to identify factors affecting the innovative behavior of military hospital personnel. Methods: The study involved the analysis of 146 structured questionnaires received from military hospital personnel in D city and S city. Data were collected from January 10 to February 9, 2019. The SPSS/WIN 24.0 program was used for data analysis, which included the t-test, ANOVA, $Scheff{\acute{e}}$ test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and multiple regression analysis. Results: The multiple regression analysis showed that factors affecting innovative behavior of military hospital staff were the natural reward strategies of self-leadership, behavior-focused strategies of self-leadership, and organization-based psychological ownership ($R^2=.30$). Conclusion: The results suggest that to promote innovative behavior in military hospital staff, it is necessary to implement strategies that inspire self-leadership and psychological ownership.

Keywords

References

  1. Brande, P., Adkar, R. D., & Wheatley, K. (2004). Social exchange within organizations and work outcomes. Group & Organization Management, 29(3), 276-301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601103257405
  2. Cho, H., Kim, K., & Park, K. (2011). An exploratory analysis of antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership: Focused on hotel employee. Hotel Management Studies, 20(4), 75-97.
  3. Cho, Y., & Na, Y. (2013). The effects of self-leadership on behavior of changing and managing uncertainty: The role of perceived organizational support, supervisor support as a moderator. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 26(9), 2351-2376.
  4. Cho, Y. H., & Du, Z. (2016). The relationship between interactional justice, psychological ownership and innovative, workplace deviant behavior. Personnel Management Research, 23(5), 73-91.
  5. Choi, I., Park, J., & Sun, J. (2011). A study on the relationship between organizational culture and innovative behaviors of organizational members: The moderating effect of organizational trust and task conflict. Industrial Innovation Research, 27(3), 1-33.
  6. Daghfous, A. (2004), Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive best practices. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 89(2), 21-27.
  7. Diliello, T. C., & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Maximizing organizational leadership capacity for the future: Toward a model of self-leadership, innovation and creativity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 319-337. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610663114
  8. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
  9. Jeong, K. Y., Jung, H. W., & Ryu, T. M. (2015). The effects of transformational leadership on innovative behavior in the small and medium-sized enterprises: The mediating effect of psychological ownership. Personnel Management Research, 22(1), 191-212.
  10. Jung, Y., & Hur, M. (2000). An analysis on the publicness of medical services in public hospitals. Korean Public Administration Review, 33(4), 355-370.
  11. Jung, S. H. (2009). The influence of social exchange relationship on innovation behavior of public officers. The Korean Journal of Public Administration, 18(1), 3-33. https://doi.org/10.22897/KIPAJN.2009.18.1.001
  12. Kang, K. H., & Ko, Y. K. (2013). Change commitment and learning orientation as factors affecting the innovativeness of clinical nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, 19(3), 404-413. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2013.19.3.404
  13. Kim, H., & Yang, P. (2008). A study on mediating effects of selfleadership on the relationship between core self-evaluations and innovative behavior. Daehan Journal of Business, 21(5), 1831-1857.
  14. Kim, H. L. (2012). The effect that the personal justice and social exchange relationship reach to the innovative behavior: The mediated effect of the value congruence and knowledge share, Unpublished master's thesis, Kyungpook National University, Daegu.
  15. Kim, H. S., & Kang, K. H. (2015). Influence of types of leadership and organizational culture on innovative behavior of professional staff of a general hospital. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, 21(4), 447-456. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2015.21.4.447
  16. Kim, M. J., & Ko, M. S. (2011). Mediating effects of self-leadership on the relationship between nurses' core self-evaluation and innovative behaviour. Health and Social Science, 30, 171-198.
  17. Kwon, I., Seo, M., & Koh, B. (2017). The influence of leader-member exchange on psychological ownership: Mediating effect of organizational-based self-esteem. Korean Journal of Resources Development, 20(4), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.24991/KJHRD.2017.12.20.4.51
  18. Lee, K., & Jeon, M. (2011). An empirical study on the influence of social supports and exchange relations on employees' innovative behavior. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 24(2), 943-961.
  19. Mun, M. Y., & Hwang, S. Y. (2016). Impact of nursing organizational culture types on innovative behavior and job embeddedness perceived by nurses. Journal of Korean Academy Nursing Administration, 22(4), 313-322. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2016.22.4.313
  20. Park, G., Kim, Y., Jun, J., & Kim, N. (2006). Realistic evaluation on regional public hospital's de-publicization in South Korea. Journal of Critical Social Policy, 52, 289-329.
  21. Pierce, J. L., & Jussila, I. (2011). Psychological ownership and the organizational context: Theory, research evidence, and application. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 336.
  22. Prussia, G. E., Anderson, J. S., & Manz, C. C. (1998). Self-leadership and performance outcomes: The mediating influence of self-efficacy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(5), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199809)19:5<523::AID-JOB860>3.0.CO;2-I
  23. Scott, J. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  24. Seers, A. (1989). Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 118-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90060-5
  25. Suh, Y. (2017). The effect of emotional laborer's job characteristics on psychological ownership and organizational citizenship behavior. Ewha Management Review, 35(2), 21-46.
  26. Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feeling of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 439-460. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.249
  27. You, B., & Park, J. (2007). The processes and factors of innovation strategy for Korean hospitals. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 20(1), 373-395.

Cited by

  1. Predicting task performance from psychological ownership and innovative work behaviour: A cross sectional study vol.8, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1917483