DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

SW Education Program using Pair Programming Collaboration Tools

짝프로그래밍 협업도구를 활용한 SW교육프로그램

  • 김용옥 (서울서래초등학교) ;
  • 전석주 (서울교육대학교 컴퓨터교육학과)
  • Received : 2019.06.15
  • Accepted : 2019.08.26
  • Published : 2019.08.31

Abstract

In a rapidly changing society with the Fourth Industrial Revolution, future students should have the skills to utilize and organize high-quality knowledge, not the amount of knowledge. With the launch of the revised curriculum in 2015, the curriculum has been reorganized based on competency and the software education has been seeking capabilities such as 'Cultural computing knowledge', 'Computational thinking', and 'Collaborative problem solving skills'. Therefore, practical collaboration tools and education programs that can be used in the field of education are developed based on Pair Programming, which is a specific collaborative learning strategy to develop cooperative problem solving skill. The educational program using this collaboration tool was developed with a focus on developing computational thinking and collaborative problem solving skills through Pair Programming rather than focusing on learning grammar of programming language and programming techniques. In a educational program, students will be able to use collaborative tools for pair programming and foster collaborative problem-solving skills.

4차 산업혁명에 따라 빠르게 변화되는 사회에서 미래 인재는 지식의 양이 아닌 질적으로 수준 높은 지식을 활용하고 구성하는 능력이 요구되고 있다. 2015 개정 교육과정의 출범에 따라 역량 중심으로 교육과정이 개편되었으며 소프트웨어 교육에서는 '정보문화소양', '컴퓨팅 사고력', '협력적 문제 해결력'의 역량을 추구하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 미래인재의 역량인 협력적 문제해결력을 함양하기 위해서는 교육 현장에서 교사가 손쉽게 활용 가능한 협업도구와 이를 활용한 SW교육 프로그램을 개발한다. 이러한 협업도구를 활용한 SW교육프로그램은 프로그래밍 언어와 문법에 대한 지식, 프로그래밍 기법에 대해 배우는 것보다 짝프로그래밍을 통해 컴퓨팅 사고력과 협력적 문제해결력을 함양할 수 있다. 총 16차시로 구성된 수업에서 협업도구를 활용한 짝프로그래밍을 통해 수업이 참가한 학생들의 협력적 문제해결력과 코딩 이해도를 향상시킴을 보여준다.

Keywords

References

  1. Brian Hanks (2006), Student attitudes toward pair programming, ITiCSE 2006, pp. 113-117.
  2. Charlie McDowell et al. (2006), Pair programming improves student retention, confidence, and program quality, CACM 49(8), pp. 90-95.
  3. Charlie McDowell, Linda L. Werner, Heather E. Bullock, Julian Fernald (2002), The effects of pair-programming on performance in an introductory programming course, SIGCSE 2002, pp. 38-42.
  4. Griffin, P. E., Care, E. (2015), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills, New York : Springer.
  5. Hyo Won Noh, Jin Ho Park, Hoon Sung Gwak. (2013), The Design, Implementation and Verification of Distributed Pair Programming System for Supporting Collaboration, The journal of Korea Navigation Institute, 17(3), 346-353.
  6. Keun Woo Han, Eun Kyoung Lee, Young Jun Lee. (2006). The Effects of Pair Programming on Achievement and Motivated Strategies in Programming Course, The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 9(6), 19-28.
  7. Laurie A. Williams et al. (2000), Strengthening the Case for Pair Programming, IEEE Software 17(4), pp. 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.854064
  8. Laurie A. Williams, Richard L. Upchurch (2001), In support of student pair-programming, SIGCSE 2001, pp. 327-331.
  9. Laurie Williams, Eric N. Wiebe, Kai Yang, Miriam Ferzli, Carol Miller (2002), In Support of Pair Programming in the Introductory Computer Science Course, Computer Science Education 12(3), pp. 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1076/csed.12.3.197.8618
  10. Linda L. Werner, Brian Hanks, Charlie McDowell, Pair-programming helps female computer science students, ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing 4(1), Article No. 4.
  11. Min Huh, Tae-Wuk Lee (2014). Exploration of Information Subject-centered Curriculum Integration Strategies for 21 Century Key Competencies Extension, Journal of the Korea society of computer and information, 19(2), 253-261. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2014.19.2.253
  12. Ministry of Education (2015). Practical course/Informatics Curriculum, Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  13. Myoung-sub Song, Youngsik Kim. (2018). Comparison of Flow Chart Before and After Programming, The Korean Association of Computer Education, 23(1), 195-198.
  14. Nachiappan Nagappan et al. (2003), Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming, SIGCSE 2003, pp. 359-362.
  15. Park, Hye Young, Rim, Haemee. (2014). Analyzing features of collaborative problem solving competencies in PISA and ATC21S : Implications for instruction and assessment in Korea, Korean Association for Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(9), 439-462.
  16. So Eun Jeon, So Jung Choi, Woojin Paik. (2008). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pair Programming, Korean Society for Information Management, 201-206.

Cited by

  1. 중학교 정보교과에서 짝 프로그래밍이 4Cs 향상에 미치는 영향 vol.24, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.4.301
  2. 예비교사의 블록 기반 프로그래밍 교육을 위한 협업전략 탐구 vol.24, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.4.401