Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the educational methodology for improving pre-service teachers' competence of designing STEAM classes

예비교사의 융합수업 구성능력향상을 위한 교육방법 연구

  • Received : 2019.06.01
  • Accepted : 2019.08.20
  • Published : 2019.08.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

It is very important to have pre-service teachers enhance actual content development skill for STEAM classes through deep understanding of the concept. Thus the purpose of the study is to explore the educational methodology for improving pre-service teachers' competence of designing STEAM classes. The research performed with 17 pre-service teachers from Y university and 15 from S university in 2015. It includes blended learning methodology mixing online and offline classes. The result revealed that the students' perception on and the materialization skill of the STEAM education was improved by the methods of Lesson Study and blended learning. A positive result also came out in the respect of the perception on teaching with technology.

제4차 산업혁명시대에 새로운 인재상으로 대두되는 융합적 인재의 양성을 위해, 예비교사들이 다양한 학문적 융합을 통해 진정한 융합의 본질을 이해하고 이를 위한 실질적인 교안의 개발을 도모하도록 하는 것은 매우 중요한 일이다. 이에 본 연구의 목적은 예비교사들이 차후 효과적인 융합교육을 수행할 수 있도록 대학수업에서 융합수업 구성능력을 향상시키는 교육방법을 연구하는 것이다. 2015년 Y대학교 17명과 S대학교 15명의 교육대학원 학생들을 대상으로 온라인과 오프라인을 혼합한 블렌디드러닝 형태의 연구절차를 진행하였다. 연구결과에 따르면, 상호소통기반의 Lesson Study 기법과 블렌디드러닝 수업을 통해 학습자들의 융합교육에 대한 인지도와 실제 능력이 효과적으로 제고되었으며 수학교육이나 융합교육에 관한 인식과 더불어 테크놀로지 활용에 대한 인식조사에서도 긍정적인 결과가 도출되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. Y. Hong. (2014). Pre-service teachers' practical use of graphing calculators for STEAM education. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 20(3), 355-372.
  2. C. Lewis. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.
  3. J. S. Kim. (2007). Exploration of STEM Education as a New Integrated Education for Technology Education. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 7(3), 1-29.
  4. Y. S. Baek, H. J. Park, Y. Kim, S. K. Noh, J. Park, J. Leee, J. Jeong, Y. Choi & H. Han. (2012). A study on the action, plans for STEAM Education. Research Paper of Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.
  5. J. Stigler & Sr J. Hiebert. (1999). The Teaching Gap. New York: Free Press.
  6. M. Yoshida. (1999). Lesson study in elementary school mathematics in Japan: A case study. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada. Available from .
  7. A. Murata & S. Kattubadi. (2012). Grade 3 students' mathematization through modeling: Situation models and solution models with multi-digit problem solving. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31. 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.07.004
  8. C. Lewis & I. Tsuchida. (1998). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river: Research lessons and the improvement of Japanese education. American Educator, 14, 50-52.
  9. S. D. Kim & K. T. Suh. (2017), A Study on Implications for Instruction Consulting of Korea through Innovative Teaching Methods of Lesson Study. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 7(9),. 891-899.
  10. C. Lewis, R. Perry & A. Murata. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement?: The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035003003
  11. L. Sims & D. Walsh. (2008). Lesson study with preservice teachers: Lessons for lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 724-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.10.005
  12. P. J. Smith. (2001). 'Modern' learning methods: rhetoric and reality. Personnel Review, 31(1), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480210412445
  13. C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham. (2012). The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
  14. H. L. Kwon, E. K. Moon & I. W. Park. (2015). A meta-analysis on effects of blended learning in Korea. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 21(3), 333-359.
  15. S. I. Park, S. E. Lee & J. E. Song. (2007). Major Factors Influencing Effective On/offline Learning on the Blended Learning in Higher Education. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 15(1), 17-45.
  16. S. Y. Jeong. (2018). Effects of Blended Learning based Phonological Awareness Instruction on Primary English Reading Abilities. Master's dissertation. Seoul National University of Education.
  17. W. S. Kim. (2015). Analysis of Student Satisfaction Survey on Computer Practice Subject by Applying Blended Learning. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(3), 373-384. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.3.373
  18. R. Fogarty. (1991). Ten ways to integrate curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 61-65.
  19. S. K. Chung, K. H. Lee, Y. J. Yoo, B. M. Shin, M. Park & S. Y. Han. (2012). A Survey of Teachers' Perspectives on Process-Focused Assessment in School Mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 22(3), 401-427.
  20. Y. Y. Hong & Y. W. Im. (2012). An analysis of factors which affect teachers' self-confidence in using technology for mathematics class. Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(11), 565-577. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.11.565