Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dynamic identification of soil-structure system designed by direct displacement-based method for different site conditions

  • Received : 2019.01.01
  • Accepted : 2019.05.30
  • Published : 2019.08.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study mainly aims to assess the performance of soil-structure systems designed by direct displacement-based method coupled with strong column-weak beam design concept through various system identification techniques under strong ground motions. To this end, various system identification methods are employed to evaluate the dynamic characteristics of a structure (i.e., modal frequency, system damping, mode shapes, and plastic hinge formation pattern) under a strong seismic excitation considering soil-structure interaction for different site conditions as specified by ASCE 7-10. The scope of the study narrowed down to the code-complying low- to high-rise steel moment resisting frames with various heights (4, 8, 12, 16-story). The comparison of the result of soil-structure systems with fix-based support condition indicates that the modal frequencies of these systems are highly influenced by the structure heights, specifically for the softer soils. This trend is more significant for higher modes of the system which can considerably dominate the response of structures in which the higher modes have more contribution in dynamic response. Amongst all studied modes of the vibration, the damping ratio estimated for the first mode is relatively the closet to the initial assumed damping ratios. Moreover, it was found that fewer plastic hinges are developed in the structure of soil-structure systems with a softer soil which contradicts the general expectation of higher damageability of such structural systems.

Keywords

References

  1. Abadi, R.E. and Bahar, O. (2018), "Investigation of the LS level hysteretic damping capacity of steel MR frames' needs for the direct displacement-based design method", KSCE J. Civil Eng., 22(4),1304-1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1321-3.
  2. ASCE/SEI 7-10 (2010), Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE); Reston, VA, USA.
  3. Bakir, P.G. (2012), "Instrumentation and system identification of a typical school building in Istanbul", Struct. Eng. Mech., 2(43), https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.43.2.179.
  4. Belleri, A. and Riva1, P. (2011), "Soil Structure Interaction in Displacement Based Design" Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2011 Leuven, Belgium, July.
  5. Calvi, G.M., Cecconi, M. and Paolucci, R. (2012), "Seismic displacement-based design of structures: relevance of soilstructure interaction. State-of-the-Art Paper," Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Performance-Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Taormina, Italy, May.
  6. Chen, M.C., Pantoli, E., Wang, X., Astroza, R., Ebrahimian, H., Hutchinson T, Conte J.P., Restrepo J.I., Marin, C., Walsh, K.D., Bachman, R.E., Hoehler, M.S., Englekirk, R. and Faghihi, M. (2016), "Full-scale structural and nonstructural building system performance during earthquakes: Part I-specimen description, test protocol, and structural response", Earthq. Spectra, 32(2), 737-770. https://doi.org/10.1193/012414EQS016M.
  7. Chen, Z., Trombetta, N.W., Hutchinson, T.C., Mason, H.B., Bray, J.D. and Kutter, B.L. (2013), "Seismic system identification using centrifuge-based soil-structure interaction test data", J. Earthq. Eng., 17(4),469-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2012.762956.
  8. Chopra, A.K. (2007), Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
  9. CSI, SAP2000: Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design, Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, California.
  10. Ebrahimian, H., Astroza, R., Conte, J.P. and de Callafon, R.A. (2017), "Nonlinear finite element model updating for damage identification of civil structures using batch Bayesian estimation", Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 84, 194-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.02.002.
  11. Federation Internationale du Beton (2003), "Displacement-based seismic design of reinforced concrete buildings", CEB-FIP Task Group 7.2, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  12. Fenves, G.L. and Des Roches, R. (1994), "Response of the northwest connector in the Landers and Big Bear Earthquakes", UCB/EERC-94/12; Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
  13. Ganjavi, B., Bararnia, M. and Hajirasouliha, I. (2018), "Seismic response modification factors for stiffness degrading Soil-structure systems", Struct. Eng. Mech., 2(68), https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.68.2.159.
  14. Ghahari, S.F., Abazarsa, F., Avci, O., Celebi, M. and Taciroglu, E. (2016), "Blind identification of the Millikan Library from earthquake data considering soil-structure interaction", J. Struct. Control Health Monitor, 23(4), 684-706. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1803.
  15. Jafarieh, A.H. and Ghannad, M.A. (2006), "Displacement-based design considering soil-structure interaction effects", Proceedings of the 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, CA, April.
  16. Kenaraghi, H. and Rofooei, F.R. (2010), "Application of tuned mass dampers in controlling the nonlinear behavior of 3-D structural models, considering the soil structure interaction", 5th National Congress on Civil Engineering, Mashhad, Iran, May.
  17. Khosravikia, F., Mahsuli, M. and Ghannad, M.A. (2017), "Probabilistic evaluation of 2015 NEHRP soil-structure interaction provisions", ASCE J. Eng. Mech., 143(9). https://doi.10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001274.
  18. Khosravikia, F., Mahsuli, M. and Ghannad, M.A. (2018), "Soil-structure interaction in seismic design code: A risk-based evaluation," ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst., 4(4), https://doi.10.1061/AJRUA6.0000984.
  19. Ljung, L. (1987), System Identification: Theory for the User, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
  20. Lu, Y., Hajirasouliha, I. and Marshall, A.M. (2016), "Performance-based seismic design of flexible-base multi-story buildings considering soil-structure interaction", Eng. Struct., 108, 90-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.031
  21. Luco, J.E., Trifunac, M.D. and Long, H.L. (1988), "Isolation of soil-structure interaction effects by full-scale forced vibration tests", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 116(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290160102.
  22. Mahmoudabadi, V. (2013), "System identification including soil-structure interaction", M.Sc. Dissertation; International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran.
  23. Mahmoudabadi, V., Bahar, O. and Jafari, M.K. (2017), "Identifying dynamic structural parameters of soil-structure system based on data recorded during strong earthquakes", World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 11(6),703-710.
  24. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M.H. and Fenves, G.L. (2006), "Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpesSees)", OpenSees Command Language Manual, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  25. Messioud, S., Sbartai, B. and Dias, D. (2016), "Seismic response of a rigid foundation embedded in a viscoelastic soil by taking into account the soil-foundation interaction", Struct. Eng. Mech., 58(5), 887-903. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.58.5.887.
  26. Mortezaie, H. and Rezaie, H. (2018), "Effect of Soil in controlling the seismic response of three-dimensional PBPD high-rise concrete structures" Struct. Eng. Mech., 2(66), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.66.2.217.
  27. Mottershead, J.E. and Friswell, M.I. (1993), "Model updating in structural dynamics: A survey", J. Sound Vib., 167(2), 347-375. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1993.1340.
  28. Pandit, S.M. (1991), Modal and Spectrum Analysis, Wiley, New York, USA.
  29. Priestley, M.J.N. (2003), Myths and Fallacies in Earthquake Engineering (Revisited), The Mallet Milne Lecture, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  30. Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2007), Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  31. Rayleigh, L. (2010), Theory of Sound (Two Volumes), 1954th Edition, Dover Publications, New York, USA.
  32. Richardson, M.H. and McHargue, P.L. (1993), "Operating deflection shapes from time versus frequency domain measurements", 11th IMAC Conference, Kissimmee, FL, USA, September.
  33. Safak, E. (1988), "Analysis of recordings in structural engineering: adaptive filtering, prediction, and control," Open File Report 88-647; U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).
  34. Safak, E. (1991), "Identification of linear structures using discrete-time filters", J. Struct. Eng., 117(10), 3064-3085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733- 9445.
  35. Safak, E. (1995), "Detection and identification of soil structure interaction in buildings from vibration recordings," J. Struct. Eng., 121(5), 899-906. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:5(899).
  36. Snieder, R. and Safak, E. (2006), "Extracting the building Response using seismic interferometry: Theory and application to the Millikan Library in Pasadena, California", Bullet. Seismologic. Soc. America, 96(2), 586-598. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050109.
  37. Stewart, J.P. (1996), "An empirical assessment of soil-structure interaction effects on the seismic response of structures", Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
  38. Suarez, V.A. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2011), "A stability-based target displacement for direct displacement-based design of bridge piers", J. Earthq. Eng., 15(5),754-774. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2010.534233.
  39. Teughels, A. and Roeck, G.D. (2005), "Damage detection and parameter identification by finite element model updating", Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 12(12),123-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17747120.2005.9692748.
  40. Tileylioglu, S. (2008), Evaluation of Soil-structure Interaction Effects from Field Performance Data, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
  41. Todorovska, M.I. (2009a), "Seismic interferometry of a soil-structure interaction model with coupled horizontal and rocking response", Bullet. Seismologic. Soc. America, 99(2A), 611-625. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080191.
  42. Todorovska, M.I. (2009b), "Soil-structure identification of Millikan Library north-south response during four earthquakes (1970-2002), what caused the observed wandering of the system frequencies", Bullet. Seismologic. Soc. America, 99(2A), 626-635. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080333
  43. Wolf, J.P. (1985), Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
  44. Wolf, J.P. (1994), "Cone Model as a strength-of-materials approach to foundation vibration", Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna, Austria, August.
  45. Wolf, J.P. and Meek, W. (1992), "Cone models for homogeneous soil", J. Geotech. Eng. (ASCE), 118(5), 667-685. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:5(667).
  46. Wolf, J.P. and Meek, W. (1993), "Cone models for a soil layer on a flexible rock half-space", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 22(3), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290220302.
  47. Wu, W.H., Wang, J.F. and Lin, C.C. (2001), "Systematic assessment of irregular building-soil interaction using efficient modal analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 30, 573-594. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.25.

Cited by

  1. Seismic and collapse analysis of a UHV transmission tower-line system under cross-fault ground motions vol.19, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.19.6.457