DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of stiffened hangers on the structural behavior of all-steel tied-arch bridges

  • Garcia-Guerrero, Juan M. (Civil Engineering Department, Universidad Politecnica de Cartagena (UPCT)) ;
  • Jorquera-Lucerga, Juan J. (Civil Engineering Department, Universidad Politecnica de Cartagena (UPCT))
  • Received : 2018.12.30
  • Accepted : 2019.08.01
  • Published : 2019.08.25

Abstract

In tied-arch bridges, the way the arch and the deck are connected may become crucial. The deck is usually suspended from hangers made out of steel pinned cables capable of resisting axial forces only. However, a proper structural response may be ensured by fixing and stiffening the hangers in order to resist, additionally, shear forces and bending moments. Thus, this paper studies the effect of different pinned and stiffened hanger arrangements on the structural behavior of the tied-arch bridges, with the intention of providing designers with useful tools at the early steps of design. Longitudinally and transversally stiffened hangers (and the effect of hinges at the hangers and their locations) are studied separately because the in-plane and the out-of-plane behavior of the bridge are uncoupled due to its symmetry. As a major conclusion, regarding the in-plane behavior, hangers composed of cables (either with vertical, $Nielsen-L\ddot{o}hse$ or network arrangements) are recommended due to its low cost and ease of erection. Alternatively, longitudinally stiffened hangers, fixed at both ends, can be used. Regarding the out-of-plane behavior, and in addition to three-dimensional arrangements of cables, of limited effectiveness, transversally stiffened hangers fixed at both ends are the most efficient arrangement. A configuration almost as efficient and, additionally, cheaper and easier to build can be achieved by locating a hinge at the end corresponding to the most flexible structural element (normally the arch). Its efficiency is further improved if the cross-section tapers from the fixed end to the pinned end.

Keywords

References

  1. Computers and Structures, Inc. (2013), Analysis Reference Manual for SAP2000(R) v 16.
  2. De Backer, H., Outtier, A. and Van Bogaert, P. (2014), "Buckling design of steel tied-arch bridges", J. Constr. Steel Res., 103, 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.09.004
  3. Eurocode 1 (2003), Actions on structures. Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges, European Committee for Standardization; Brussels, Belgium.
  4. Eurocode 3 (2006a), Design of steel structures. Part 2: Steel bridges, European Committee for Standardization; Brussels, Belgium.
  5. Eurocode 3 (2006b), Design of steel structures. Part 1-11: Design of structures with tension components, European Committee for Standardization; Brussels, Belgium.
  6. Garcia-Guerrero, J.M. and Jorquera-Lucerga, J.J. (2018), "Effect of Stiff Hangers on the Longitudinal Structural Behavior of Tied-Arch Bridges", Appl. Sci., 8(258). https://doi.org/10.3390/app8020258
  7. Hu, X., Xie, X., Tang, Z., Shen, Y., Wu, P. and Song, L. (2015), "Case study on stability performance of asymmetric steel arch bridge with inclined arch ribs", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 18(1), 273-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.18.1.273
  8. IAP-11 (2011), Instruccion sobre las acciones a considerar en el proyecto de puentes de carretera, Ministerio de Fomento; Madrid, Spain. [In Spanish]
  9. Jodidio, P. (1998), Santiago Calatrava, Taschen, Cologne, Germany.
  10. Jorquera-Lucerga, J.J. (2007), "A study on structural behaviour of spatial arch bridges", (Estudio del comportamiento resistente de los puentes arco espaciales), Ph.D. Thesis; Technical University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. [In Spanish]
  11. Jorquera-Lucerga, J.J. (2013), "Understanding Calatrava's bridges: A conceptual approach to the 'La Devesa-type' footbridges", Eng. Struct., 56, 2083-2097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.026
  12. Karnowsky, I. (2012), Theory of Arched Structures, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany.
  13. Lebet, J.P. and Hirt, M.A. (2013), Steel Bridges, EPFL Press, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  14. Leonhardt, F. (1982), Bridges [Brucken], The Architectural Press, London, UK.
  15. Li, Y., Xiao, R.-C. and Sun, B. (2017), "Study on design parameters of leaning-type arch bridges", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 64(2), 225-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.64.2.225
  16. Manterola-Armisen, J. (2006), Puentes (Bridge Engineering), Colegio de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Madrid, Spain. [In Spanish]
  17. Manterola-Armisen, J., Gil, M.A. and Munoz-Rojas, J. (2011), "Spatial Arch Bridges Over the Galindo and Bidasoa Rivers", Struct. Eng. Int., 21, 114-121. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686611X12910257102794
  18. Matlab (2014), "Matlab R2014", The MathWorks Inc.
  19. Menn, C. (1989), Prestressed Concrete Bridges, Birkhauser Verlag, Vienna, Austria.
  20. Palkowski, S. (2012), "Buckling of parabolic arches with hangers and tie", Eng. Struct., 44, 128-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.028
  21. Pfeifer (accessed 2017), Tension Members; https://www.pfeifer.de/emag/PFEIFER-Zugglieder/index
  22. Salonga, J. and Gauvreau, P. (2014), "Comparative Study of the Proportions, Form, and Efficiency of Concrete Arch Bridges", J. Bridge Eng., 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000537
  23. Santiago Calatrava, Architects & Engineers (accessed 2017), https://calatrava.com/
  24. Siegrist, C. (1997), Curso de puentes-arco de hormigon, E.T.S. de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Madrid, Spain. [In Spanish]
  25. Tveit, P. (accessed 2018), "About the Network arch bridge", Available online: https://home.uia.no/pert/index.php/My_Publications
  26. Tzonis, A. (2007), Santiago Calatrava: Complete Works, Rizzoli, New York, EEUU.

Cited by

  1. Improving the Structural Behavior of Tied-Arch Bridges by Doubling the Set of Hangers vol.10, pp.23, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238711
  2. The Diagonal Arch Bridge, a Particular Case of Spatial Arch Bridges vol.11, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041869