인류세 담론은 누구에게 열려있는가? 지구적 위험과 인식론의 갈등

  • 이인건 (한국과학기술원 과학기술정책대학원)
  • Published : 2019.03.31

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Abettan, C. (2016) 'Between hype and hope: What is really at stake with personalized medicine?', Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. Springer, 19(3), pp. 423-430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9697-2
  2. Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2014) 'The politics of buzzwords at the interface of technoscience, market and society: The case of "public engagement in science"', Public Understanding of Science, 23(3), pp. 238-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513515371
  3. Cairns, R. and Krzywoszynska, A. (2016) 'Anatomy of a buzzword: The emergence of "the water-energy-food nexus" in UK natural resource debates', Environmental Science & Policy. Elsevier, 64, pp. 164-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.007
  4. Hamilton, C. (2017) Defiant earth: the fate of humans in the Anthropocene. John Wiley & Sons. 정서진 역 (2018), 인류세: 거대한 전환 앞에 선 인간과 지구 시스템, 서울: 이상북스.
  5. Pfeiffer, S. (2017) 'The Vision of "Industrie 4.0" in the Making-a Case of Future Told, Tamed, and Traded', NanoEthics. NanoEthics, 11(1), pp. 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-016-0280-3
  6. Ribeiro, B. E., Smith, R. D. J. and Millar, K. (2017) 'A mobilising concept? Unpacking academic representations of responsible research and innovation', Science and Engineering Ethics. Springer, 23(1), pp. 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9761-6
  7. Working Group on the Anthropocene. (2018, 12). Newsletter of the Anthropocene Working Group. Retrieved from http://quaternary.stratigraphy.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Anthropocene-Working-Group-Newsletter-Vol-8.pdf