DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Species-Specific PCR Primers for the Rapid and Simultaneous Identification of the Six Species of Genus Takifugu

  • Dong, Chun Mae (Biotechnology Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • Park, Yeon Jung (Biotechnology Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • Noh, Jae Koo (Biotechnology Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • Noh, Eun Soo (Biotechnology Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • An, Cheul Min (Biotechnology Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • Kang, Jung-Ha (Biotechnology Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • Park, Jung Youn (Biotechnology Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Mi (Biotechnology Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science)
  • 투고 : 2019.09.13
  • 심사 : 2019.10.17
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31

초록

Pufferfish (Takifugu spp.) are economically important edible marine fish. Mistakes in pufferfish classification can lead to poisoning; therefore, accurate species identification is critical. In this study, we used the mtDNA cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI) to design specific primers for six Takifugu species among the 21 domestic or imported pufferfish species legally sold for consumption in Korea. We rapidly and simultaneously identified these pufferfish species using a highly efficient, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system with the six species-specific primers. The results showed that species-specific multiplex PCR (multiplex species-specific polymerase chain reaction; MSS-PCR) either specifically amplified PCR products of a unique size or failed. MSS-PCR yielded amplification fragment lengths of 897 bp for Takifugu pardalis, 822 bp for T. porphyreus, 667 bp for T. niphobles, 454 bp for T. poecilonotus, 366 bp for T. rubripes, and 230 bp for T. xanthpterus using the species-specific primers and a control primer (ca. 1,200 bp). We visualized the results using agarose gel electrophoresis to obtain accurate contrasts of the six Takifugu species. MSS-PCR analysis is easily performed and provides identification results within 6 h. This technique is a powerful tool for the discrimination of Takifugu species and will help prevent falsified labeling, protect consumer rights, and reduce the risk of pufferfish poisoning..

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Acar C, Ishizaki S, Nagashima Y (2017) Toxicity of the lessepsian pufferfish Lagocephalus sceleratus from eastern Mediterranean coasts of Turkey and species identification by rapid PCR amplification. Eur Food Res Technol 243:49-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-016-2721-1
  2. Cohen NJ, Deeds JR, Wong ES, Hanner RH, Yancy HF, White KD, Thompson TM, Wahl M, Pham TD, Guichard FM, Huh I, Austin C, Dizikes G, Gerber SI (2009) Public health response to puffer fish (tetrodotoxin) poisoning from mislabeled product. J Food Prot 72:810-817. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-72.4.810
  3. Hsieh YW, Hwang DF (2004) Molecular phylogenetic relationships of puffer fish inferred from partial sequences of cytochrome b gene and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. J Agric Food Chem 52:4159-4165. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf035462l
  4. Hsieh CH, Chang WT, Chang HC, Hsieh HS, Chung YH, Hwang DF (2010) Puffer fish-based commercial fraud identification in a segment of cytochrome b region by PCR-RFLP analysis. Food Chem 121:1305-1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.02.004
  5. Hwang CY, Youn HY, Han HR (2002) Development of non-invasive fecal PCR assay for detecting the Helicobacter species infection in dogs. J Vet Clin 19:295-298.
  6. Ishizaki S, Yokoyama Y, Oshiro N, Teruya N, Nagashima Y, Shiomi K, Watabe S (2006) Molecular identification of pufferfish species using PCR amplification and restriction analysis of a segment of the 16S rRNA gene. Comp Biochem Phys D Genom Proteom 1:139-144.
  7. Kim IS, Lee WO (1990) Synopsis of the suborder Tetraodontoidei (Pisces; Tetraodontiformes) from Korea. Korean J Ichthyol 2:1-27.
  8. Kim KH, Lee HY, Kim YS, Kim MR, Jung YK, Lee JH, Chang HS, Park YC, Kim SY, Choi JD, Jang YM (2014) Development of species-specific PCR to determine the animal raw material. J Food Hyg Saf 29:347-355. https://doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2014.29.4.347
  9. Luekasemsuk T, Panvisavas N, Chaturongakul S (2015) TaqMan qPCR for detection and quantification of mitochondrial DNA from toxic pufferfish species. Toxicon 102:43-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2015.05.016
  10. Noh ES, Lee MN, Kim EM, Park JY, Noh JK, An CM, Kang JH (2017) Development of a multiplex PCR assay for rapid identification of Larimichthys polyactis, L. crocea, Atrobucca nibe, and Pseudotolithus elongates. J Life Sci 27:746-753. https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2017.27.7.746
  11. Rasmussen RS, Morrissey MT (2008) DNA-based methods for the identification of commercial fish and seafood species. Comp Rev Food Sci Food Saf 7:280-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2008.00046.x
  12. Sezaki K, Itoi S, Watabe S (2005) A simple method to distinguish two commercially valuable eel species in Japan Anguilla japonica and A. anguilla using polymerase chain reaction strategy with a species-specific primer. Fish Sci 71:414-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-2906.2005.00979.x
  13. Tyler JC (1980) Osteology, phylogeny and higher classification of the fishes of the order plectognathi (Tetraodontiformes). NOAA Tec Rep NMFS Cir 434:422.
  14. Unseld M, Beyermann B, Brandt P, Hiesel R (1995) Identification of the species origin of highly processed meat products by mitochondrial DNA sequences. PCR Methods Appl 4:241-243. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.4.4.241