Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accessory penis: A rare method of peno-urethral separation of sexual function and voiding following successful complex hypospadias reconstruction with a free ileum flap

  • Elia, Rossella (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, China Medical University Hospital) ;
  • Pafitanis, Georgios (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, China Medical University Hospital) ;
  • Ciudad, Pedro (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, China Medical University Hospital) ;
  • Chen, Hung-Chi (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, China Medical University Hospital)
  • Received : 2018.06.11
  • Accepted : 2019.04.23
  • Published : 2019.07.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Hypospadias is a congenital malformation of the male genitalia. The reconstructive objectives are to obtain voiding with laminar flow and satisfactory sexual function. Several urethroplasty techniques have been described, but for perineal or revisional cases no single technique has shown robust success. In this study, we describe the expanded use of intestinal flaps for urethral reconstruction and report a peculiar request from a patient to undergo peno-urethral separation after successful hypospadias repair with a free ileum flap. A 51-year-old male patient with perineal hypospadias underwent several urethral reconstructive procedures with poor outcomes. A free ileum flap was attempted as a substitute for the urethra. Following successful reconstruction, separation of the neo-urethra (ileum) from the penile body was performed to address the patient's sexual expectations. A free ileum flap proved to be a reliable urethral substitute in perineal hypospadias reconstruction, with a successful outcome. The peno-urethral separation with the creation of an "accessory penis," however peculiar, optimized the results in terms of both sexual and urinary function. Anatomical restoration of the urethra and patient-reported expectations are the key to successful hypospadias reconstructive procedures. Sexual function outcomes and the patient's perception of success should not be underestimated, even when urinary function has been restored.

Keywords

References

  1. Springer A, van den Heijkant M, Baumann S. Worldwide prevalence of hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol 2016;12:152.
  2. Snodgrass W, Bush N. Primary hypospadias repair techniques: a review of the evidence. Urol Ann 2016;8:403-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.192097
  3. Baskin LS, Ebbers MB. Hypospadias: anatomy, etiology, and technique. J Pediatr Surg 2006;41:463-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.11.059
  4. Barbagli G, De Angelis M, Palminteri E, et al. Failed hypospadias repair presenting in adults. Eur Urol 2006;49:887-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.01.027
  5. Aldamanhori R, Chapple CR. Management of the patient with failed hypospadias surgery presenting in adulthood. F1000Res 2017;6:1890. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11980.1
  6. Bales GT, Kuznetsov DD, Kim HL, et al. Urethral substitution using an intestinal free flap: a novel approach. J Urol 2002;168:182-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64857-4
  7. Hiradfar M, Shojaeian R, Sharifabad PS. Two staged modified substitution urethroplasty using appendix-free flap. BMJ Case Rep 2015;2015:bcr2015210771. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2015-210771
  8. Kumar J, Sen S, Dange A, et al. Use of ileum in reconstruction of the congenitally abnormal posterior urethra in two children. J Pediatr Urol 2007;3:333-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.10.006
  9. Mondaini N, Ponchietti R, Bonafe M, et al. Hypospadias: incidence and effects on psychosexual development as evaluated with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory test in a sample of 11,649 young Italian men. Urol Int 2002; 68:81-5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000048423
  10. Wallis MC, Braga L, Khoury A. The role of flaps and grafts in modern hypospadiology. Indian J Urol 2008;24:200-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.40616
  11. Chen SH, Yeong EK, Tang YB, et al. Free and pedicled appendix transfer for various reconstructive procedures. Ann Plast Surg 2012;69:602-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31827475e2
  12. Neal DE. Replacement of the urinary bladder. Lancet 1999; 353 Suppl 1:SI24-5.
  13. Meeks JJ, Erickson BA, Granieri MA, et al. Stricture recurrence after urethroplasty: a systematic review. J Urol 2009; 182:1266-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.027
  14. Deibert CM, Hensle TW. The psychosexual aspects of hypospadias repair: a review. Arab J Urol 2011;9:279-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2011.10.004
  15. Rynja SP, Wouters GA, Van Schaijk M, et al. Long-term followup of hypospadias: functional and cosmetic results. J Urol 2009;182(4 Suppl):1736-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.03.073

Cited by

  1. Urethroplasty of extensive penile urethral strictures with a longitudinal ventral tubed flap of penile skin (modified Orandi urethroplasty): 20 years of follow-up of two cases vol.47, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.00941
  2. Scrotal septal flap and two-stage operation for complex hypospadias: A retrospective study vol.9, pp.13, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i13.2983