Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Subtotal calvarial vault reconstruction utilizing a customized polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implant with chimeric microvascular soft tissue coverage in a patient with syndrome of the trephined: A case report

  • Wang, Jessica S. (Department of Plastic Surgery, Center for Wound Healing, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital) ;
  • Louw, Ryan P. Ter (Department of Plastic Surgery, Center for Wound Healing, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital) ;
  • DeFazio, Michael V. (Department of Plastic Surgery, Center for Wound Healing, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital) ;
  • McGrail, Kevin M. (Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital) ;
  • Evans, Karen K. (Department of Plastic Surgery, Center for Wound Healing, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital)
  • Received : 2018.04.26
  • Accepted : 2018.10.02
  • Published : 2019.07.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The syndrome of the trephined is a neurologic phenomenon that manifests as sudden decline in cognition, behavior, and sensorimotor function due to loss of intracranial domain. This scenario typically occurs in the setting of large craniectomy defects, resulting from trauma, infection, and/or oncologic extirpation. Cranioplasty has been shown to reverse these symptoms by normalizing cerebral hemodynamics and metabolism. However, successful reconstruction may be difficult in patients with complex and/or hostile calvarial defects. We present the case of a 48-year-old male with a large cranial bone defect, who failed autologous cranioplasty secondary to infection, and developed rapid neurologic deterioration leading to a near-vegetative state. Following debridement and antibiotic therapy, delayed cranioplasty was accomplished using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implant with free chimeric latissimus dorsi/serratus anterior myocutaneous flap transfer for vascularized resurfacing. Significant improvements in cognition and motor skill were noted in the early postoperative period. At 6-month follow-up, the patient had regained the ability to speak, ambulate and self-feed-correlating with evidence of cerebral/ventricular re-expansion on computed tomography. Based on our findings, we advocate delayed alloplastic implantation with total vascularized soft tissue coverage as a viable alternative for reconstructing extensive, hostile calvarial defects in patients with the syndrome of the trephined.

Keywords

References

  1. Ashayeri K, M Jackson E, Huang J, et al. Syndrome of the trephined: a systematic review. Neurosurgery 2016;79:525-34. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001366
  2. Hagan M, Bradley JP. Syndrome of the trephined: functional improvement after reconstruction of large cranial vault defects. J Craniofac Surg 2017;28:1129-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003747
  3. Jeyaraj P. Importance of early cranioplasty in reversing the "Syndrome of the Trephine/Motor Trephine Syndrome/Sinking Skin Flap Syndrome". J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2015;14:666-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-014-0673-1
  4. Fong AJ, Lemelman BT, Lam S, et al. Reconstructive approach to hostile cranioplasty: a review of the University of Chicago experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015;68: 1036-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.04.014
  5. Lee JC, Kleiber GM, Pelletier AT, et al. Autologous immediate cranioplasty with vascularized bone in high-risk composite cranial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:967-75. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829f4b59
  6. Lee JW, Hsueh YY, Lee JS. Composite skull and dura defect reconstruction using combined latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous and serratus anterior muscle-rib free flap coupled with vascularized galea transfer: a case report. Microsurgery 2010;30:632-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20808
  7. Bender A, Heulin S, Rohrer S, et al. Early cranioplasty may improve outcome in neurological patients with decompressive craniectomy. Brain Inj 2013;27:1073-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2013.794972
  8. Chabas JF, Dellavolpe C, Riah Y, et al. Cranial reconstruction after a post-craniotomy empyema. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62:e131-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2008.10.001
  9. Zanotti B, Zingaretti N, Verlicchi A, et al. Cranioplasty: review of materials. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27:2061-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003025
  10. Reddy S, Khalifian S, Flores JM, et al. Clinical outcomes in cranioplasty: risk factors and choice of reconstructive material. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;133:864-73. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000013
  11. Oh JH. Recent advances in the reconstruction of cranio-maxillofacial defects using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;40:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-018-0141-9
  12. Jonkergouw J, van de Vijfeijken SE, Nout E, et al. Outcome in patient-specific PEEK cranioplasty: a two-center cohort study of 40 implants. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016;44: 1266-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.005
  13. Rosenthal G, Ng I, Moscovici S, et al. Polyetheretherketone implants for the repair of large cranial defects: a 3-center experience. Neurosurgery 2014;75:523-9. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000477
  14. Kumar AR, Bradley JP, Harshbarger R, et al. Warfare-related craniectomy defect reconstruction: early success using custom alloplast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:1279-87. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318205f47c
  15. Honeybul S, Janzen C, Kruger K, et al. The impact of cranioplasty on neurological function. Br J Neurosurg 2013;27: 636-41. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2013.817532

Cited by

  1. Outcomes and Utility of Intracranial Free Tissue Transfer vol.131, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894211008699