DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Surgical outcomes of sternal rigid plate fixation from 2005 to 2016 using the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database

  • Tran, Bao Ngoc N. (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School) ;
  • Chen, Austin D. (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School) ;
  • Granoff, Melisa D. (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School) ;
  • Johnson, Anna Rose (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School) ;
  • Kamali, Parisa (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School) ;
  • Singhal, Dhruv (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School) ;
  • Lee, Bernard T. (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School) ;
  • Fukudome, Eugene Y. (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School)
  • Received : 2018.09.04
  • Accepted : 2019.05.30
  • Published : 2019.07.15

Abstract

Background Sternal rigid plate fixation (RPF) has been adopted in recent years in high-risk cases to reduce complications associated with steel wire cerclage, the traditional approach to sternal closure. While sternal RPF has been associated with lower complication rates than wire cerclage, it has its own complication profile that requires evaluation, necessitating a critical examination from a national perspective. This study will report the outcomes and associated risk factors of sternal RPF using a national database. Methods Patients undergoing sternal RPF from 2005 to 2016 in the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were identified. Demographics, perioperative information, and complication rates were reviewed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for postoperative complications. Results There were 381 patient cases of RPF identified. The most common complications included bleeding (28.9%), mechanical ventilation >48 hours (16.5%), and reoperation/readmission (15.2%). Top risk factors for complications included dyspnea (odds ratio [OR], 2.672; P<0.001), nonelective procedure (OR, 2.164; P=0.010), congestive heart failure (OR, 2.152; P=0.048), open wound (OR, 1.977; P=0.024), and operating time (OR, 1.005; P<0.001). Conclusions Sternal RPF is associated with increased rates of three primary complications: blood loss requiring transfusion, ventilation >48 hours, and reoperation/readmission, each of which affected over 15% of the study population. Smokers remain at an increased risk for surgical site infection and sternal dehiscence despite RPF's purported benefit to minimize these outcomes. Complications of primary versus delayed sternal RPF are roughly equivalent, but individual patients may perform better with one versus the other based on identified risk factors.

Keywords

References

  1. Mayba II. Non-union of fractures of the sternum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:1091-3. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198567070-00013
  2. El Oakley RM, Wright JE. Postoperative mediastinitis: classification and management. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1030-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)01035-1
  3. Song DH, Lohman RF, Renucci JD, et al. Primary sternal plating in high-risk patients prevents mediastinitis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;26:367-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.04.038
  4. Gummert JF, Barten MJ, Hans C, et al. Mediastinitis and cardiac surgery: an updated risk factor analysis in 10,373 consecutive adult patients. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;50:87-91. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-26691
  5. Wu LC, Renucci JD, Song DH. Sternal nonunion: a review of current treatments and a new method of rigid fixation. Ann Plast Surg 2005;54:55-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000139564.37314.1f
  6. Raman J, Lehmann S, Zehr K, et al. Sternal closure with rigid plate fixation versus wire closure: a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;94:1854-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.07.085
  7. Ozaki W, Buchman SR, Iannettoni MD, et al. Biomechanical study of sternal closure using rigid fixation techniques in human cadavers. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1660-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(98)00231-8
  8. Allen KB, Thourani VH, Naka Y, et al. Randomized, multicenter trial comparing sternotomy closure with rigid plate fixation to wire cerclage. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 153:888-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.093
  9. Vos RJ, Jongbloed L, Sonker U, et al. Titanium plate fixation versus conventional closure for sternal dehiscence after cardiac surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;65:338-42. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1583297
  10. Zhao Y, Yang Y, Gao Z, et al. Treatment of traumatic sternal fractures with titanium plate internal fixation: a retrospective study. J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;12:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0580-x
  11. Kwok AC, Pannucci CJ, Agarwal JP. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Flap Failure data are inaccurate after 2010. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;138:570e-571e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002467
  12. Lee JC, Raman J, Song DH. Primary sternal closure with titanium plate fixation: plastic surgery effecting a paradigm shift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:1720-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d51292
  13. Ferraris VA, Hochstetler M, Martin JT, et al. Blood transfusion and adverse surgical outcomes: the good and the bad. Surgery 2015;158:608-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.027
  14. Kim JY, Khavanin N, Rambachan A, et al. Surgical duration and risk of venous thromboembolism. JAMA Surg 2015; 150:110-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1841
  15. Cheng H, Chen BP, Soleas IM, et al. Prolonged operative duration increases risk of surgical site infections: a systematic review. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2017;18:722-35. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2017.089
  16. McCoy CC, Englum BR, Keenan JE, et al. Impact of specific postoperative complications on the outcomes of emergency general surgery patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015;78: 912-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000611
  17. Havens JM, Peetz AB, Do WS, et al. The excess morbidity and mortality of emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015;78:306-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000517
  18. Shi YD, Qi FZ, Zhang Y. Treatment of sternal wound infections after open-heart surgery. Asian J Surg 2014;37:24-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2013.07.006
  19. Toyoda Y, Fu RH, Li L, et al. Smoking as an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in plastic surgical procedures: a propensity score-matched analysis of 36,454 patients from the NSQIP database from 2005 to 2014. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;141:226-36. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003963
  20. Peivandi AA, Kasper-Konig W, Quinkenstein E, et al. Risk factors influencing the outcome after surgical treatment of complicated deep sternal wound complications. Cardiovasc Surg 2003;11:207-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-2109(03)00006-1
  21. Demondion P, Mercier O, Kolb F, et al. Sternal replacement with a custom-made titanium plate after resection of a solitary breast cancer metastasis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2014;18:145-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivt456
  22. Allen KB, Thourani VH, Naka Y, et al. Rigid plate fixation versus wire cerclage: patient-reported and economic outcomes from a randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2018;105: 1344-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.12.011

Cited by

  1. Sternum separation in the postoperative period: analysis of risk factors vol.26, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.17816/0869-2106-2020-26-4-217-223