Fig. 1. (a) unstructured overset meshes, and (b) surface mesh of the projectile
Fig. 3. 6DOF analysis for varying flight mach number
Fig. 4. Sectional pressure coefficient distributions for varying flight Mach number
Fig. 5. Comparison of time trajectories for varying platform pitch angle at M = 0.6
Fig. 6. 6DOF analysis for varying platform pitch angle at M = 0.6
Fig. 7. Comparison of time trajectories for varying platform pitch angle at M = 0.8
Fig. 8. 6DOF analysis for varying platform pitch angle at M = 0.8
Fig. 9. Sectional pressure coefficient distributions for varying platform pitch angle at M = 0.8
Fig. 10. Comparison of time trajectories for varying roll command angles
Fig. 11. 6DOF analysis for varying roll command angles
Fig. 12. Comparison of time trajectories for varying pitch-yaw command angles
Fig. 13. 6DOF analysis for varying pitch-yaw command angles
Fig. 2. Comparison of time trajectories for varying flight mach number
참고문헌
- H. Bae, K. Lee, J. Jeong, D. Sang, and J. H. Kwon, “500 lbs-class Air-to-Surface Missile Design by Integration of Aerodynamics and RCS,” Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 184-191, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2012.40.2.184
- Y. R. Yang, S. B. Hu, S. Y. Je, C. W. Park, R. S. Myong, T. H. Cho, U. C. Hwang, and S. E. Je, “An External Shape Optimization Study to Maximize the Range of a Guided Missile in Atmospheric Flight,” Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 519-526, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2009.37.6.519
- M. S. Han, R. S. Myong, T. H. Cho, J. S. Hwang, and C. H. Park, “Analysis of the Aerodynamic Characteristics of Missile Configurations Using a Semi-Empirical Method,” Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 26-31, 2005. https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2005.33.3.026
- L. Auman, J. Doyle, C. Rosema, M. Underwood, and W. Blake, "Missile DATCOM User's Manual," U.S. Army Aviation & Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center, p. 110, 2008.
- P. L. Roe, “Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors and Difference Scheme,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 357-372, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5
- P. R. Spalart, and S. R. Allmaras, "A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows," AIAA 92-0439, 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January, 1992.
- V. Venkatakrishnan, “Convergence to Steady State Solutions of the Euler Equations on Unstructured Grids with Limiters,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 118, No. 1, pp. 120-130, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1084
- R. Nelson, "Flight Stability and Automatic Control," McGraw Hill, New York, p. 426, 1998.
- M. S. Jung, "Development of a Conservative Overset Mesh Scheme via Intergrid Boundary Reconnection on Unstructured Meshes," Ph. D. Thesis, KAIST, p. 208, 2010.
- S. J. Ahn, and O. J. Kwon, “Numerical Investigation of Plume-Induced Flow Separation for a Space Launch Vehicle,” Journal of Computational Fluids Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 66-71, 2013. https://doi.org/10.6112/kscfe.2013.18.2.066