한국가정과교육학회지 (Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association)

한국가정과교육학회 (Korea Home Economics Education Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

체인지메이커(Changemaker) TEMPS 프로그램을 통한 학습자의 성장에 대한 사례연구

A Case Study on the Growth of Learners through the Changemaker TEMPS Program

  • 투고 : 2019.06.07
  • 심사 : 2019.09.26
  • 발행 : 2019.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 문헌 고찰을 통해 체인지메이커 교육의 의미를 살펴보고, 가정과 수업에 맞는 체인지메이커 교육 프로그램을 개발한 후 이를 적용한 학습자의 성장에 관한 사례를 통해 가정교과에서의 체인지메이커 교육의 의의에 대해 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해서 먼저 체인지메이커 교육에 대한 개념을 정의하였다. 체인지메이커 교육이란, 실생활 속에서 우리가 직면하는 문제들에 대해 생각하고(Thinking), 배우고(Education), 만들고(Making), 참여하고(Participation) 즐기며(Play) 다양한 문제해결 방안을 도출하고 서로 공유(Share)하여 변화(Change)시키는 교육을 말한다. 둘째, 본 연구에서는 가정교과에서의 체인지메이커 교육의 방향을 "폭넓은 메이커 활동을 통해 사회 문제에 관심을 가지고 문제를 해결하고 타인과 공감, 협업하여 행복하고 건강한 가정생활과 직업생활을 주도적으로 영위할 수 있도록 하는 것"으로 하고 내용의 범위를 "아동 가족, 식생활, 의생활, 주생활, 소비생활의 5개의 영역의 내용 요소를 추출하여 이를 교육할 수 있는 세부 주제를 선정"하고 교육 방법으로 "주제별로 TEMPS 단계를 통해 교과의 목적을 달성할 수 있도록 한다."로 제안하였다. 셋째, 체인지메이커 프로그램의 설계는 체인지메이커 교육의 5가지 핵심 아이디어 중에서 TEMPS를 단계로 프로그램을 설계하였다. T(Thinking)는 문제에 대해 파악하고 해결방법을 생각하는 단계이고, E(Education)는 다음 단계(Making)를 위한 배경지식을 얻는 단계이다. M(Making)은 문제 해결을 위해 필요한 목표물을 만드는 단계이고, P(Participation)와 P(Play)는 참여하고 즐기는 단계이다. S(Share)는 결과물 전시, SNS공유, 수업 발표회 등을 통해 교육적으로 확산을 시켜 궁극적으로 사회를 변화(Change)시키는 단계이다. 본 연구에서는 TEMPS 단계를 기본으로 하여 중학교 12개 프로그램, 고등학교 15개 프로그램을 개발하였고, 프로그램 당 각각 2차시~12차시로 중학교 총 68차시, 고등학교 총 68차시 분량이다. 체인지메이커 프로그램에 1년 간(2018년 3월 2일~2018년 12월 31일) 참여한 학습자들은 삶과 교육의 연계, 실천 능력의 향상, 자기 주도 학습, 자존감 향상, 성취감과 자기 성찰, 비판적 인식 향상, 감각적인 관찰 등에서 긍정적인 성장을 보여주었다.

The purpose of this study is to examine the meaning of Changemaker education and to investigate the significance of Changemaker education in home economics education through a study of growth of learners applying the TEMPS program. To this end, first, the concept of Changemaker education was defined. Changemaker education is an education that changes society in a positive direction through a process of thinking about, learning about, making, and participating(playing) in various problems that we face in real life and drawing out solutions and share he solutions with others. Second, in this reasearch, the direction of Changemaker education is to make them interested in social problems and solve it and to make both the family and the career life happy and healthy by collaborating with other people. The scope of the contents is defined as "the selection of the content elements of the five domains of the child family, diet nutrition, clothing, housing and consumer life". As a way of teaching, we suggested that the TEMPS phase is followed so that the session purpose is achieved. Third, the Changemaker program consists of five steps of TEMPS among the five key ideas of Changemaker education. T(Thinking) is the step of understanding the problem and thinking about how to solve it, and E(Education) is getting the background for the next step. M(Making) is a step to create a target for problem solving, and P(Participation) and P(Play) are steps to Participation and enjoy. S(Share) is a step of changing the society through the result display, SNS sharing, and class presentation. In this study, 12 programs for middle school and 15 programs for high school were developed on the basis of TEMPS level. Each of the programs consists of 2 to 12 unit hours, which add up to 68 hours in the middle school program and 68 in high school. The learners who participated in the Changemaker program for one year (March 2, 2018~December 31, 2018) will experience improvement in many aspects including the linkage of life and education, practical ability, self-directed learning, self-esteem, sense of achievement and self-reflection, sensory observation, and so on.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ashoka (n.d.). Strategic focus areas. Retrieved from https://www.ashoka.org/en-KR/focus/social-entrepreneurship
  2. Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and "making" in education: the democratization of invention. In J. W. Herman., & C. Buching (Eds.), Fablabs: of machines, makers, and inventors (pp. 203-223). Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript-Verlag.
  3. Blikstein, P., Martinez, S. L., & Pang, H. A. (2016). Meaningful making: projects and inspirations for fablabs and makerspaces. Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
  4. Bornstein, D. (2013). How to change the world: social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. (Park, G. J., Na, K. S., & Park, Y. J., Trans.). Seoul: Knowledge Creative Office. (Original work published 2004).
  5. Choi, J. A. (2018). A case study on the development of maker education program in a business setting utilizing design thinking process: focused on the educational effects of 5-ONs. M.A. Unpublished master's thesis, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
  6. Choi, S. K., & Daegu Changemaker Project Course Research Association (2018). Innovative education centered on students, project changemaker education. Seoul: Joyful school.
  7. Dewey, J. (2007). Democracy and education. (Lee, H. W., Trans.). Seoul: History of Education and Science. (Original work published 1916).
  8. Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. Innovation: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(3), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135
  9. Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. (2014). Arts education in the learning sciences. In R. K. Sawyer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp.626-648). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Hatch, M. (2013). The maker movement manifesto: rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hankers, and thinkers. Columbus, OH: MacGraw-Hill Education.
  11. Hwang, J. W., Kang, I. A., & Kim, H. S. (2016). Exploring the possibility of TMSI model as maker pedagogy: focusing on high school case. Proceedings of the Korean Educational Technology Association Conference, 2016(2), 166-176.
  12. Jeong, E. J. (2013). The effects of group art therapy using visual journaling on self-acceptance & personal growth for art therapy trainees. Korean Journal of Art Therapy, 20(4), 731-761. https://doi.org/10.35594/KATA.2013.20.4.005
  13. Joe, G. M. (2017). The development and the effect in the early childhood science education program based on maker education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyung Sung University, Busan, Korea.
  14. Joo, K. H. (2015). Study of e-PBL teaching and learning model for efficient flipped learning. Journal of the Society of Convergence Knowledge, 3(1), 47-53.
  15. Kang, E. S. (2017). A study on the educational effects of the maker education outreach program: a case study focused on free semester activity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
  16. Kang, I. A. (2003). The constructivism of our times. Seoul: Munumsa.
  17. Kang, I. A., & Yoon, H. J. (2017). Exploring the evaluation framework of maker education. Journal of the Korea Contents Society, 17(11), 541-553.
  18. Kang, I. A., Jung, J. H., Seo, B. H., & Jung, D. N. (2011). (Dreaming of a joyful change in the classroom) Project learning. Seoul: Imaginary Channel.
  19. Kim, J. O. (2018). Development of an instructional model for maker-based STEAM education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
  20. Kim, N. E. (2017). Discussion on the change of the age of the fourth industrial revolution and the direction of change in home and medical life education. In Proceedings of the 2017 Spring Korean Home Economics Education Association Conference (pp. 79-84). Seoul: Korean Home Economics Education Association.
  21. Kwak, Y. S., & Kim, J. H. (2003). Qualitative research on common features of best practices in the secondary school science classroom. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 23(2), 144-154.
  22. Lee, M. K. (2016). Signification of student-organized activity (changemaker): case study of middle school on "the greatest learning project"(sachoisoup). The Korea Educational Review, 22(3), 235-264.
  23. Lee, N. R. (2015). Changemaker creators of change to overthrow the world and make new rules. Seoul: Wiseberry.
  24. Loertscher, D. V., Preddy, L., & Derry, B. (2013). Makerspaces in the school library learning commons and the uTEC maker model. Teacher Librarian, 41(2), 48-51.
  25. Martinez, S. L,. & Stager, G. S. (2013). Invent to learn: making tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
  26. Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate?. Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/1174583
  27. Merriam, S. (1994). Qualitative case study method. (Heo, M. H. Trans.). Seoul: Yangseowon. (Original work published 1988).
  28. Ministry of SMEs and Startups (2017). 2018 Maker education program guidebook. Daejeon: Author.
  29. Naver Knowledge Encyclopedia (n.d.). Growth. Retrieved from https://terms.naver.com
  30. Papert, S. (2000). What’s big idea: towards a pedagogy of idea power. IBM Systems Journal, 39(3), 720-729. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.393.0720
  31. Park, E. J. (2017). The purpose of education, individuation or socialization?: drawing upon the concept of ‘action’ of hannah arendt. The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(4), 35-62. https://doi.org/10.15754/jkpe.2017.39.4.002
  32. Park, J. Y. (2015). A study on open fabrication space framework of creative thinking for ICT design convergence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea.
  33. Schrock, A. R. (2014). Education in disguise: culture of a hacker and maker space. Inter Actions: CLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 10(1), 1-26.
  34. The Ministry of Education (2015a). A general discussion on the curriculum of primary and secondary schools. Sejong: Author.
  35. The Ministry of Education (2015b). Education in the practical arts(technology & home economics)/informatics curriculum. Sejong: Author.
  36. Willis, J., & Wright, K. E. (2000). A general set of procedures for constructivist instructional design: the new R2D2 model. Educational Technology, 40(2), 5-20.
  37. Yang, Y. J., Yoon, H. S., & Im, J. H. (2009). Become a 21st century talent and PBL learning. Seoul: Hangyungsa.
  38. Yoon, H. J. (2018). The development of a model of maker education utilizing design thinking. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.

피인용 문헌

  1. 지속가능한 발전을 위한 가정과 교육프로그램 개발: '소비생활 개선'을 주제로 한 체인지메이커 교육을 중심으로 vol.58, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2020.021
  2. 과정 중심 평가를 위한 중학교 가정과 교수·학습과정안 개발: 생애설계 단원을 중심으로 vol.33, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2021.3.33.1.101