한국가정과교육학회지 (Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association)

한국가정과교육학회 (Korea Home Economics Education Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

백워드 디자인에 기반한 고등학교 '건강한 커플관계' 교육과정(안) 개발

Development of 'Healthy Couple Relationship' Curriculum in High School Based on Backward Design

  • Yu, In-Young (Nagwon middle school) ;
  • Park, Mi-Jeong (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2019.06.24
  • 심사 : 2019.09.26
  • 발행 : 2019.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 백워드 디자인에 기반하여 고등학교 가정교과의 '건강한 커플관계' 교육과정(안)을 개발하는데 목적이 있다. 이에 따라 문헌 분석을 통해 '건강한 커플관계'의 내용요소를 추출하고, 가정과교사 197명, 고등학생 154명을 대상으로 '건강한 커플관계' 내용 요구도 조사를 하였다. 이를 바탕으로 백워드 교육과정 설계 모형으로 고등학교 가정교과의 '건강한 커플관계' 교육과정(안)을 개발하여 전문가집단의 타당도 검증을 받았다. 본 연구의 결과로 첫째, '건강한 커플관계' 내용 요소에 대하여 5점 리커트 척도로 요구도를 조사한 결과, 전체 내용 요소에 대한 평균은 가정과 교사 4.39, 고등학생 4.02였으며, '데이트 폭력에 대한 이해'의 내용 요소가 교사 4.70, 학생 4.19로 두 집단에서 모두 가장 높게 나타났다. 둘째, 고등학교 가정교과의 '건강한 커플관계' 교육과정(안)은 교육과정 목표와 2개의 단원으로 구성되었고, 각 단원은 단원 목표, 세부 학습 주제 및 내용 요소, 평가계획, 수업계획을 포함하였다. 각 단원별에 대하여 템플릿을 구성하여 총 2개의 템플릿을 구성하였다. 본 연구는 고교학점제 시행에 대비하여 고등학교 가정교과의 선택과목으로 '건강한 커플관계' 교육과정(안)을 제안하고, 선택 과목 개설의 기반을 마련한 것에 의의가 있다.

The purpose of this study is to develop a 'Healthy Couple Relationship' curriculum(plan) for high school home economics based on backward design. In this study, the content elements of 'Healthy Couple Relationship' were extracted through literature analysis, and the need for contents of 'Healthy Couple Relationship' was surveyed in 197 families of home economics teachers and 154 high school students. Based on this, the 'Healthy Couple Relationship' curriculum(plan) of high school home economics curriculum was developed as the backward design, and it was verified by the expert group. The results are as follows: First, when measured on a 5-point Likert scale, the mean scores of the need for content elements of 'Healthy Couple Relationship' was 4.39 for teachers, and 4.02 for students, respectively. The content elements of 'understanding dating violence' was 4.70 for teachers and 4.19 for students. Second, the developed 'Healthy Couple Relationship' curriculum consists of two templates, one for each unit, including curriculum goals, unit composition and unit goals, 8 learning subjects and content elements, evaluation plans including 24 lesson plans. In this study, it is meaningful to propose a "Healthy Couple Relationship" curriculum as an elective course in high school home economics curriculum in preparation for the high school credit system, and to lay the foundations for opening elective courses.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Department of Health & Human Services. (2017). Healthy Marriage and Relationship Education Programs for Youth. Retrieved from www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/years_task_46_final_report_finalv2_b508.pdf
  2. Futris, T. G., Sutton, T. E., & Richardson, E. W. (2013). An evaluation of the relationship smarts plus program on adolescents in Georgia. Journal of human sciences and extension, 1(2), 1-15.
  3. Hong, D. A. G., & Shin, H. S. (2002). A exploratory study for the development of premarital preparation education as curriculum. Korean journal Of human ecology. 4(2), 29-47.
  4. Jun, M. K., Lee, E. J., Yu, N. S., Wang, S. S., & Choi, S. E. (2017). Effectiveness of parenting education program for adolescents. Journal of Korean home economics education association, 29(4), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2017.12.29.4.31
  5. Kang, H. S., & Lee, J. E. (2018). Integration of competence-based education with understanding curriculum through backward design. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 8(1), 329-339.
  6. Kerpelman, J. L. (2007). Youth focused relationships and marriage education. The forum for family and consumer issues, 12(1). Retrieved from https://www.dibbleinstitute.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/07/Youth-Focused-Relationship-and-Marriage-Education.pdf.
  7. Kim, J. S., & Cho, S. W. (2010). An analysis of current status of sexual behaviors and consciousness about sex of adolescents: on adolescents including elementary school students. Journal of School Social Work. 19, 61-87.
  8. Kim, J. W. (2012). A study on the change of family-related contents in Home Economics by national curriculum: Focus on the first national curriculum-the 2007 revised national curriculum., Unpublished master's thesis, Dongguk University of Education, Seoul, Korea.
  9. Kim, S. H. (2015). Ninety-five percent of middle and high school students in Busan approve of dating. Busan Daily. Retrieved from http://www.busan.com/view/busan/view.php?code=20150919000007
  10. Ko, M. S., & Chun, Y. J. (2015). The effects of premarital education program on the changes in perception of university students. Journal of cognitive Enhancement and Intervention, 6(3), 111-128.
  11. Lee, A. N. (2018). The root of a low birth, loss of romance. News2day, Retrieved from http://www.news2day.co.kr/98775.
  12. Lee, E. Y. (2018). Development of an instructional design model for practical problem-based learning in practical arts subject matter. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Korea National University of Education, Chung Buk, Korea.
  13. Lee, G. S., & Yoo, T. M. (2015). Development of module for consumer content area based on the backward design. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 27(2), 95-119.
  14. Lee, H. J. (2018). An analysis of recent research on dating violence in Korea. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(4), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.4.153
  15. Yi, J. E. (2011). Development of understanding curriculum based on backward design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
  16. Lee, K. W., Ohn, J. D., & Paik, N. J. (2014). A study on the composition of curriculum contents and the proposal of the criteria of achievement. Korean society for curriculum studies, 2nd national curriculum expert forum documentary, 31-78.
  17. Lee, M. S., & Kwak, J. H. (2016). A study on the effects of dating experiences on social relationships among adolescents. Journal of social welfare management, 3(1), 131-152.
  18. Lee, S. H. (2004). Principles of curriculum development. Seoul: hakjisa.
  19. Pearson, M. (2018). LoveU2: Relationship smarts PLUS 4.0(Classic). Berkeley, CA: The Dibble Institute.
  20. Ministry of education (2015c). Practical Arts(Technology and Home economics)/ Informatics curriculum, #2015-74 [Separate Volume 10], Sejong.
  21. Ministry of Gender Equality and Family (2017). 2017년 청소년종합 실태조사. [2017 Youth Comprehensive Survey]. Seoul: Kyungsung Munhwasa.
  22. Park, J. S., Lee. J. K., & Lee, J. L. (2018). Couples relationship education program research in Korea: An analysis of program development in human ecology journals. Journal of family relations, 22(4), 81-105. https://doi.org/10.21321/jfr.22.4.81
  23. Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social work research, 27(2), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.2.94
  24. Seo, J. B., Kwon, J. S., Kim, C. J., Lee, S. Y., & Lee, J. W. (2008). Introduction to education. Seoul: Taeyeongbook.
  25. Wiggins & McTighe (2005). Understanding by design(2nd ed). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  26. Yoo, S. J. (2017). Systematic development of instruction for family life planning of high school curriculum for technology and home economics based on backward design. unpublished doctoral dissertation, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.

피인용 문헌

  1. 차기 교육과정을 대비한 고등학교 가정교과(군) 선택과목의 구조화 vol.33, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2021.3.33.1.129