DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The use of implant surveyed fixed prosthesis for removable partial denture with a few unilateral remaining teeth: A case report

편측 소수 잔존치 증례에서 CAD software를 활용한 planning 및 임플란트 서베이드 고정성 보철물을 이용한 국소의치 수복: 증례보고

  • Park, Jeongkeun (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Eun (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Park, Ji-Man (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Jeehwan (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Shim, June-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • 박정근 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김종은 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 박지만 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김지환 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 심준성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2019.03.19
  • Accepted : 2019.04.29
  • Published : 2019.07.31

Abstract

As implant can be covered by National Health Insurance Service (NHIS), it was increased the interest in the removable partial denture (RPD) with the surveyed fixed prosthesis supported by implant fixture. To achieve predictable result, it needs the prudent implant planning by basic principles of RPD and patient's residual ridge. This 67 years old age male had a few unilateral remaining teeth, and hoped the treatment covered by NHIS. As using CAD software, the position of implant is planned with regarding to occlusal table of provisional denture, basic principles of RPD, and resorbed residual ridge. The definitive prostheses can ensure the stability and retention of removable prosthesis. When planning implant fixed prostheses, the digital technique was utilized to consider basic principle of RPD and resorbed residual ridge. As a result, it provided satisfactory prostheses.

임플란트에 대한 급여의 확대로 임플란트의 지지를 받는 서베이드 고정성 보철물 제작 후 국소의치로 수복하는 증례에 대한 관심이 증가하고 있다. 이러한 증례의 예지성 있는 결과를 위해서 국소의치의 기본적인 설계 원칙과 잔존 치조골을 동시에 고려한 임플란트 계획수립이 필요하다. 본 증례는 편측 소수 잔존치를 가진 67세 남자 환자로 국민건강보험의 적용을 받을 수 있는 치료를 희망했다. CAD 소프트웨어를 활용하여 임시의치의 교합면, 국소의치의 기본적인 설계 원칙 및 흡수된 치조제를 모두 고려한 임플란트의 식립 위치를 결정하였다. 치료 결과 상악 및 하악 의치의 안정성 및 유지력이 적절하게 확보되었다. 본 증례는 임플란트 고정성 보철물 제작 시 국소의치의 기본적인 원칙과 흡수된 치조제를 모두 고려하기 위해 디지털 기술을 진단 및 치료에 활용하였고, 안정적인 결과를 얻었기에 이를 보고하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bolouri A. Removable partial denture design for a few remaining natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:346-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80109-7
  2. Perel ML. Telescope dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:151-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90107-8
  3. Sadig W, Fahmi F. The modified swing-lock: a new approach. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:428-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80387-7
  4. Swami PR, Sanyal P, Sam SM. Classification of unconventional removable partial denture. Int J Oral Care Res 2018;6:77-83. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10051-0153
  5. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  6. Chikunov I, Doan P, Vahidi F. Implant-retained partial overdenture with resilient attachments. J Prosthodont 2008;17:141-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00261.x
  7. Kaufmann R, Friedli M, Hug S, Mericske-Stern R. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22:233-41.
  8. Kuzmanovic DV, Payne AG, Purton DG. Distal implants to modify the Kennedy classification of a removable partial denture: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:8-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.04.010
  9. Ohkubo C, Kurihara D, Shimpo H, Suzuki Y, Kokubo Y, Hosoi T. Effect of implant support on distal extension removable partial dentures: in vitro assessment. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:52-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01641.x
  10. Park JM, Koak JY, Kim SK, Joo JH, Heo SJ. Consideration for the combination treatment of removable partial denture and implant. Implantol 2015;19:101-11.
  11. Grossmann Y, Nissan J, Levin L. Clinical effectiveness of implant-supported removable partial dentures: a review of the literature and retrospective case evaluation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:1941-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.081
  12. Mijiritsky E. Implants in conjunction with removable partial dentures: a literature review. Implant Dent 2007;16:146-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3180500b2c
  13. Shahmiri RA, Atieh MA. Mandibular Kennedy Class I implant-tooth-borne removable partial denture: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:225-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02044.x
  14. Gross MD. Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts. Aust Dent J 2008;53:S60-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00043.x
  15. Zancope K, Abrao GM, Karam FK, Neves FD. Placement of a distal implant to convert a mandibular removable Kennedy class I to an implant-supported partial removable Class III dental prosthesis: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:528-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.011
  16. Yoda N, Zheng K, Chen J, Li W, Swain M, Sasaki K, Li Q. Bone morphological effects on post-implantation remodeling of maxillary anterior buccal bone: A clinical and biomechanical study. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:393-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.12.010
  17. Pihlaja J, Napankangas R, Kuoppala R, Raustia A. Veneered zirconia crowns as abutment teeth for partial removable dental prostheses: a clinical 4-year retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:633-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.05.008