Korean Journal of Radiology

  • 제20권6호
  • /
  • Pages.939-946
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1229-6929(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-8330(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Percutaneous Sacroplasty for Painful Sacral Metastases Involving Multiple Sacral Vertebral Bodies: Initial Experience with an Interpedicular Approach

  • Qing-Hua Tian (Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital East Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences) ;
  • He-Fei Liu (Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital East Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences) ;
  • Tao Wang (Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital East Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences) ;
  • Ying-Sheng Cheng (Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital East Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences) ;
  • Chun-Gen Wu (Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital East Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences)
  • 투고 : 2018.12.14
  • 심사 : 2019.02.06
  • 발행 : 2019.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: To report our initial experience of percutaneous sacroplasty (PSP) with an interpedicular approach for treating painful sacral metastases involving multiple sacral vertebral bodies. Materials and Methods: This study prospectively enrolled 10 consecutive patients (six men and four women; mean age, 56.3 ± 13.8 years) who underwent PSP for painful sacral metastases involving multiple sacral vertebral bodies from March 2017 to September 2018. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) values, and the number of opioids prescribed to the patients were assessed before and after PSP. The procedure duration, length of hospitalization, and complications were also recorded. Results: Mean VAS and ODI declined significantly from 6.90 ± 1.20 and 74.40 ± 5.48 before the procedure to 2.70 ± 1.34 and 29.60 ± 14.57 after the procedure, respectively (p < 0.01). The median number of opioids prescribed per patient decreased from 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-3) pre-procedure to 1 (IQR 0-3) post-procedure (p < 0.01). Nine of the 10 patients showed no or decreased opioid usage, and only 1 patient showed unchanged usage. The mean procedure duration was 48.5 ± 3.0 minutes. The average length of hospitalization was 4.7 ± 1.7 days. Extraosseous cement leakage occurred in three cases without causing any clinical complications. Conclusion: PSP with an interpedicular approach is a safe and effective treatment in patients with painful sacral metastases involving multiple sacral vertebral bodies and can relieve pain and improve mobility.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by grant National Natural Scientific Fund of China (grant number 81701798), Natural Fund from Shanghai Science And Technology Commission (grant number 18ZR1429400, 19411971800), Shanghai Sailing Program (grant number 17YF1414600), and Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital East Campus (grant number 2016014), China.

참고문헌

  1. Kortman K, Ortiz O, Miller T, Brook A, Tutton S, Mathis J, et al. Multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of sacroplasty in patients with osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures or pathologic sacral lesions. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:461-466 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010347
  2. Pereira LP, Clarencon F, Cormier E, Rose M, Jean B, Le Jean L, et al. Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous sacroplasty: a single-centre experience in 58 consecutive patients with tumors or osteoporotic insufficient fractures treated under fluoroscopic guidance. Eur Radiol 2013;23:2764-2772 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2881-3
  3. Gupta AC, Chandra RV, Yoo AJ, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Bell DL, Mehta BP, et al. Safety and effectiveness of sacroplasty: a large single-center experience. Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2202-2206 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4027
  4. Dehdashti AR, Martin JB, Jean B, Rufenacht DA. PMMA cementoplasty in symptomatic metastatic lesions of the S1 vertebral body. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2000;23:235-237 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002700010052
  5. Talmadge J, Smith K, Dykes T, Mittleider D. Clinical impact of sacroplasty on patient mobility. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014;25:911-915 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2014.02.007
  6. Frey ME, Warner C, Thomas SM, Johar K, Singh H, Mohammad MS, et al. Sacroplasty: a ten-year analysis of prospective patients treated with percutaneous sacroplasty: literature review and technical considerations. Pain Physician 2017;20:E1063-E1072 https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj/2017.7.E1063
  7. Yang SC, Tsai TT, Chen HS, Fang CJ, Kao YH, Tu YK. Comparison of sacroplasty with or without balloon assistance for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2018;26:2309499018782575
  8. Basile A, Tsetis D, Cavalli M, Fiumara P, Di Raimondo F, Coppolino F, et al. Sacroplasty for local or massive localization of multiple myeloma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010;33:1270-1277 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9761-x
  9. Sun G, Jin P, Li M, Liu XW, Li FD. Three-dimensional C-arm computed tomography reformation combined with fluoroscopic-guided sacroplasty for sacral metastases. Support Care Cancer 2012;20:2083-2088 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1317-3
  10. Agarwal V, Sreedher G, Weiss KR, Hughes MA. Sacroplasty for symptomatic sacral hemangioma: a novel treatment approach. A case report. Interv Neuroradiol 2013;19:245-249 https://doi.org/10.1177/159101991301900216
  11. Andresen R, Radmer S, Ludtke CW, Kamusella P, Wissgott C, Schober HC. Balloon sacroplasty as a palliative pain treatment in patients with metastasis-induced bone destruction and pathological fractures. Rofo 2014;186:881-886 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1356418
  12. Moussazadeh N, Laufer I, Werner T, Krol G, Boland P, Bilsky MH, et al. Sacroplasty for cancer-associated insufficiency fractures. Neurosurgery 2015;76:446-450; discussion 450 https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000658
  13. Nas OF, Kacar E, Buyukkaya R, S˛anal B, Erdogan C, Hakyemez B. Treatment of sacral aneurysmal bone cyst with percutaneous sacroplasty. Spine J 2016;16:e1-e2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.08.005
  14. Burgard CA, Dinkel J, Strobl F, Paprottka PM, Schramm N, Reiser M, et al. CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous osteoplasty with or without radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of painful extraspinal and spinal bone metastases: technical outcome and complications in 29 patients. Diagn Interv Radiol 2018;24:158-165 https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2018.17265
  15. Zhang J, Wu CG, Gu YF, Li MH. Percutaneous sacroplasty for sacral metastatic tumors under fluoroscopic guidance only. Korean J Radiol 2008;9:572-576 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.6.572
  16. Firat AK, Gumus˛ B, Kaya E, Kuku I, Harma A. Interpedicular approach in percutaneous sacroplasty for treatment of sacral vertebral body pathologic fractures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011;34 Suppl 2:S282-S287 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9855-5
  17. Dmytriw AA, Talla K, Smith R. Percutaneous sacroplasty for the management of painful pathologic fracture in a multiple myeloma patient: case report and review of the literature. Neuroradiol J 2017;30:80-83 https://doi.org/10.1177/1971400916678642
  18. Miller JW, Diani A, Docsa S, Ashton K, Sciamanna M. Sacroplasty procedural extravasation with high viscosity bone cement: comparing the intraoperative long-axis versus short-axis techniques in osteoporotic cadavers. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:899-904 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012442
  19. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine 2000;25:2940-2953 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017
  20. Zanoli G, Stromqvist B, Jonsson B. Visual analog scales for interpretation of back and leg pain intensity in patients operated for degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:2375-2380 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200111010-00015
  21. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001;94:149-158
  22. Farrar JT, Berlin JA, Strom BL. Clinically important changes in acute pain outcome measures: a validation study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2003;25:406-411 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-3924(03)00162-3
  23. Iannessi A, Amoretti N, Marcy PY, Sedat J. Percutaneous cementoplasty for the treatment of extraspinal painful bone lesion, a prospective study. Diagn Interv Imaging 2012;93:859-870 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2012.08.001
  24. Yin JJ, Pollock CB, Kelly K. Mechanisms of cancer metastasis to the bone. Cell Res 2005;15:57-62 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cr.7290266
  25. Nader R, Rhines LD, Mendel E. Metastatic sacral tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2004;15:453-457 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2004.04.009
  26. Perrin RG, Laxton AW. Metastatic spine disease: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and evaluation of patients. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2004;15:365-373 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2004.04.018
  27. Finiels H, Finiels PJ, Jacquot JM, Strubel D. [Fractures of the sacrum caused by bone insufficiency. Meta-analysis of 508 cases]. Presse Med 1997;26:1568-1573
  28. Douis H, James SL. CT-guided sacroplasty for the treatment of zone II sacral insuffciency fractures. Clin Radiol 2009;64:1037-1040 https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009001000017
  29. Hierholzer J, Anselmetti G, Fuchs H, Depriester C, Koch K, Pappert D. Percutaneous osteoplasty as a treatment for painful malignant bone lesions of the pelvis and femur. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:773-777 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000079987.80153.85
  30. Uemura A, Matsusako M, Numaguchi Y, Oka M, Kobayashi N, Niinami C, et al. Percutaneous sacroplasty for haemorrhagic metastases for hepatocellular carcinoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:493-495
  31. Jayaraman MV, Chang H, Ahn SH. An easily identifable anatomic landmark for fluoroscopically guided sacroplasty: anatomic description and validation with treatment in 13 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1070-1073 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1502
  32. Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983;8:817-831 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198311000-00003