Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety (해양환경안전학회지)

The Korean Society of Marine Environment and safety (해양환경안전학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on HSTPA Model for Improvement of Emergency Response Training for Ships

선박의 비상대응훈련 개선을 위한 HSTPA 모델에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2019.04.03
  • Accepted : 2019.06.27
  • Published : 2019.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Since emergency response training for maritime safety and safety education of maritime education institutions are conducted based on the set scenarios and education contents, there are limitations in the reduction of human error and response to various situations. Although there is a need for improvement, there is no way to improve response capabilities by assessing existing education training and securing diversity in situations. This study proposes a theoretical procedure analyzer method to model the diversity of situations for the improvement of emergency response training. This paper defines the human and system theoretical procedure analysis model (HSTPA) based on the organic relationship of the source and system. The limitations of the existing training were derived by analyzing the errors that each component could produce and applying them to the fire response training scenarios requiring vertical reporting systems and responses. The segmentation and inspection of training scenario considerations applying the proposed HSTPA model is believed to help create diverse and realistic scenarios in emergency response training and education, and improve the situation judgment understanding and response capabilities of the subjects.

해사안전을 위한 비상대응훈련 및 해기교육기관의 안전교육은 정해진 시나리오와 교육내용을 기반으로 실시되기 때문에, 다양한 상황에 따른 인적오류 감소와 대응에는 한계가 있다. 이에 대한 개선 필요성이 요구되고 있으나, 기존 교육훈련에 대한 평가와 상황의 다양성 확보를 통한 대응능력 향상을 위한 방안은 부재하다. 본 연구는 비상대응훈련 개선을 위해 상황 다변성을 모델링할 수 있는 이론적 절차 분석기법을 제안한다. 선원과 시스템의 유기적 관계에 기반한 인적 및 시스템 이론적 절차 분석 모델(HSTPA)을 정의하고, 각 구성요소들이 발생시킬 수 있는 오류를 분석, 수직적 보고체계와 대응이 요구되는 화재대응 훈련 시나리오에 이를 적용하여 기존 훈련의 한계점을 식별하였다. 제안된 HSTPA 모델을 적용한 훈련 시나리오 고려요소의 세분화 및 점검은 비상대응훈련 및 교육에 있어 다양하고 현실적인 시나리오 생성과 피훈련자들의 상황판단 이해력 및 대응능력 향상에 도움이 될 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Grech, M. R., T. Horberry and A. Smith(2002), Human error in maritime operations: Analyses of accident reports using the Leximancer tool, In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 46, No. 19, pp. 1718-1721.
  2. IMO(1994), Better standards, training and certification: IMOs response to human error, IMO News.
  3. IMO(2000), Amendments to the Code for the investigation of marine casualties and incidents A 21/Res 884.
  4. Jang, J. H., M. J. Kang and D. C. Lee(2009), A Study on the Reason of Marine Acidents - focused on Human Factors, Journal of Ergonomics Society of Korea, pp. 495-501.
  5. Kim, H. T., S. Na and W. H. Ha(2011), Case Study of Marine Accident Investigation and Analysis with Focus on Human Error, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 137-150. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2011.30.1.137
  6. KMST(2017), Korea Maritime Safety Tribunal, Marine Accident Statistics and Accident Cases, p. 5.
  7. KMST(2018), Korea Maritime Safety Tribunal, Marine Accident Statistics and Accident Cases, p. 15.
  8. KR(2012), Korea register, PSC CIC CHECKLIST(Tokyo, Paris, Indian MOUs). available at http://www.krs.co.kr.
  9. Martineau, E. and J. Roy(2011), Maritime anomaly detection: Domain introduction and review of selected literature, Defence Research and Development Canada, No. DRDC Valcartier TM 2010-460, pp. 2-9.
  10. Owens, B. D. and A. R. Crocker(2015), SimSup's Loop: A control theory approach to spacecraft operator training, In 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1-17.
  11. Riveiro, M., G. Falkman and T. Ziemke(2008), Improving maritime anomaly detection and situation awareness through interactive visualization, In 2008 11th International Conference on Information Fusion, pp. 1-8.
  12. Riveiro, M. and G. Falkman(2011), The role of visualization and interaction in maritime anomaly detection, In Visualization and Data Analysis 2011, Vol. 7868, pp. 1-41.
  13. Stringfellow, M. V., G. L. Nancy and B. D. Owens(2010), Safety-driven design for software-intensive aerospace and automotive systems, pp. 515-525.