Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The role of tolerance and self-sufficiency in a nation's adoption of nuclear power generation: A search for a quick and simple indicator

  • Roh, Seungkook (Nuclear Policy Research Center, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI))
  • Received : 2018.08.17
  • Accepted : 2018.11.15
  • Published : 2019.04.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Nuclear energy remains one of the world's major energy sources, making up over 10% of global electricity generation in 2017. Public acceptance of nuclear energy is essential for its adoption. From a practical perspective, it is beneficial to have a simple indicator that can predict the actual adoption of nuclear energy. Based on practical experience, the authors suggest tolerance and self-sufficiency as potential indicators that may predict the adoption of nuclear energy. By evaluating the cross-sectional data of 18 countries in 2013, this research assesses the actual impact of tolerance and self-sufficiency on public acceptance in order to identify the validity of the two variables. The results indicate that the two variables are statistically significant, while public acceptance is insignificant in explaining national adoption of nuclear energy. This may be because tolerance reflects national willingness to accept potential risk, while self-sufficiency explains a government's likelihood of developing non-carbon energy sources.

Keywords

References

  1. H.-T. Choi, T.-R. Kim, Necessity of management for minor earthquake to improve public acceptance of nuclear energy in South Korea, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 50 (2018) 494-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.11.013
  2. B.P. Company, BP Statistical Review of World Energy, British Petroleum Company, 1981.
  3. S. Roh, J.W. Lee, Differentiated effects of risk perception dimensions on nuclear power acceptance in South Korea, Energy Pol. 122 (2018) 727-735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.018
  4. J.-B. Chung, E.-S. Kim, Public perception of energy transition in Korea: nuclear power, climate change, and party preference, Energy Pol. 116 (2018) 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.007
  5. J. Park, B.K. Sovacool, The contested politics of the Asian atom: peripheralisation and nuclear power in South Korea and Japan, Environ. Polit. (2018) 1-26.
  6. S. Roh, Big data analysis of public acceptance of nuclear power in Korea, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 49 (2017) 850-854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2016.12.015
  7. J. Van der Pligt, J.R. Eiser, Dimensional salience, judgment, and attitudes, in: Attitudinal Judgment, Springer, 1984, pp. 161-177.
  8. V.H. Visschers, C. Keller, M. Siegrist, Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: investigating an explanatory model, Energy Pol. 39 (2011) 3621-3629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.064
  9. M.L. Finucane, A. Alhakami, P. Slovic, S.M. Johnson, The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits, J. Behav. Decis. Making 13 (2000) 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S
  10. V.H. Visschers, M. Siegrist, How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster, Risk Analysis, Int. J. 33 (2013) 333-347.
  11. M. Siegrist, G. Cvetkovich, Perception of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge, Risk Anal. 20 (2000) 713-720. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.205064
  12. C. Sun, X. Zhu, Evaluating the public perceptions of nuclear power in China: evidence from a contingent valuation survey, Energy Pol. 69 (2014) 397-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.011
  13. N.F. Pidgeon, I. Lorenzoni, W. Poortinga, Climate change or nuclear powerdNo thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain, Global Environ. Change 18 (2008) 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005
  14. V.P. Nguyen, M.-S. Yim, Examination of different socioeconomic factors that contribute to the public acceptance of nuclear energy, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 50 (5) (June 2018) 767-772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.02.005
  15. M. Siegrist, B. Sutterlin, C. Keller, Why have some people changed their attitudes toward nuclear power after the accident in Fukushima? Energy Pol. 69 (2014) 356-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.026
  16. E. Park, Positive or negative? Public perceptions of nuclear energy in South Korea: evidence from big data, Nucl. Eng. Technol. (2018). Available online 31 October 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.10.025.
  17. R.B. Zajonc, Attitudinal effects of mere exposure, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 9 (1968) 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
  18. O. F. E. Cooperation, Development, OECD Health Statistics 2014, 2014.

Cited by

  1. The Pahlev Reliability Index: A measurement for the resilience of power generation technologies versus climate change vol.53, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.10.013