DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Indian Dispute Resolution Culture and ADR Institutions in the Perspective of Panchayat and Lok adalat

인도의 분쟁해결문화와 ADR제도: Panchayat와 Lok Adalat을 중심으로

  • 정용균 (국립강원대학교 경영대학 국제무역학과)
  • Received : 2019.05.10
  • Accepted : 2019.05.31
  • Published : 2019.06.01

Abstract

There are diverse kinds of alternative dispute resolution systems in India. In the structure of society in Ancient India, the panchayat system was the creation of the villagers themselves and was composed of persons who were generally respected and to whose decisions the villagers were accustomed to give unreserved obedience. The ruler of the province allowed the villagers to govern themselves and the villagers assumed the responsibility for the settlement of disputes among themselves. However, the panchayat system has been heavily influenced by the structure of the village at hand, which depends on the caste system in India. This study categorizes the village dispute resolution structure into four main types depending on the extent of the caste group's dominance within the village. In addition, the Indian government created Lok Adalat which combines the indigenous dispute resolution with modern law system. Today, Lok Adalat is one of the widely used dispute resolution systems in India.

Keywords

References

  1. 류경희, "현대 힌두교의 이해", 남아시아연구, 한국외국어대학교 인도연구소, 제3호, 1998.
  2. 신군재, "ADR을 통한 인도기업과 분쟁해결방안에 관한 연구", 통상정보연구, 한국통상정보학회, 제14권, 제4호, 2012.
  3. 이병도, "태국의 인도문화와 인도인사회에 관한 연구", 남아시아연구, 한국외국어대학교인도연구소, 제12권 제2호, 2007. https://doi.org/10.21587/JSAS.2007.12.2.009
  4. 이은구, "인도문화의 해외전파: 캄보디아에서의 힌두교", 남아시아연구, 한국외국어대학교 인도연구소, 제5호, 2000.
  5. 이종원, "한.인도간의 통상 분쟁 현황과 사례분석, 인도의 반덤핑 관세정책을 중심으로", 통상정보연구, 제12권 제3호, 2010.
  6. 정용균, "미국의 조정-중재(Med-Arb) 제도에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 한국중재학회, 제24권, 제1호, 2014.
  7. 정용균, "인도네시아의 분쟁해결문화와 비즈니스 협상전략: 지역연구방법론을 중심으로", 동남아연구, 한국외국어대학교 동남아연구소, 제18권, 제4호, 2016a.
  8. 정용균, "베트남의 분쟁해결문화와 비즈니스 협상전략: 지역연구방법론을 중심으로", 통상정보연구, 한국통상정보학회, 제18권, 제4호, 2016b.
  9. 정용균, "캄보디아의 분쟁해결문화와 협상방식: ADR을 중심으로", 동남아연구, 한국외국어대학교 동남아연구소, 제28권, 제2호, 2018a.
  10. 정용균, "라오스의 분쟁해결제도와 비즈니스협상문화", 분쟁해결연구, 단국대학교 분쟁해결연구소, 제16권 제3호, 2018b. https://doi.org/10.16958/DRSR.2018.16.3.111
  11. 정용균, "미얀마의 분쟁해결문화와 제도", 중재연구, 한국중재학회, 제28권 제4호, 2018c.
  12. 정용균, "말레이시아의 분쟁해결문화와 비즈니스 협상", 통상정보연구, 한국통상정보학회, 제20권, 제4호, 2018d.
  13. 정용균, "필리핀의 분쟁해결문화와 비즈니스협상전략", 국제지역연구, 국제지역학회, 제28권 제4호, 2019a.
  14. 정용균, "필리핀 및 기타 원주민사회 분쟁해결문화에 대한 탐색적 연구: 회복적 정의의 관점을 중심으로", 분쟁해결연구, 단국대학교 분쟁해결연구소, 제16권 제3호, 2019b. https://doi.org/10.16958/DRSR.2018.16.3.111
  15. 정용균, "일본의 분쟁해결문화와 ADR제도: Med-Arb의 관점을 중심으로", 한일경상논집, 한일경상학회, 제83호, 2019c.
  16. 쓰치야 겐지, "문화의 번역: 의미공간의 성립", 야노 토루(아시아지역연구회 역), 지역연구의 방법, 전예원, 1998.
  17. Bail, Shishir, "From Nyaya Panchayat to Gram Nyayalayas: The Indian State and Rural Justice", Socio-Legal Review, Vol.11, No.1, 2015.
  18. Capulong, Eduardo, "Mediation and the Neocolonial Legal Order: Access to Justice and Self-determination in the Philippines", Alexander Blewett III School of Laws, Vol.27, No.3, 2012.
  19. Chung, Yongkyun, "Combining Arbitration with Mediation: Two Cultures of China and Malaysia", Journal of Arbitration Studies, Vol.26, No.3, 2016.
  20. Chung, Yongkyun, "An Eclectic View on the Relative Role of Rule of Law and Alternative Dispute Resolution in Legal Development Assistance: The Case of the ASEAN Region", International Trade, Politics and Development, Vol.2, No.1, 2018.
  21. Chung, Yongkyun and Ha, Hong-Youl, "Arbitrator Acceptability in International Commercial Arbitration: The Trading Firm Perspective", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol.27, No.3, 2016.
  22. Clad, James, "Grave Judgement", Far Eastern Economic Review, Vol.12, 1990.
  23. Cohn, Bernard, "Anthropological Notes on Disputes and Law in India", American Anthropologist, Vol.67, No.6, 1965.
  24. Dube, S. C., Indian Village, Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press, 1955.
  25. Galanter, Marc and Jayanth K. Krishnan, "Bread for the Poor: Access to Justice and the Rights of the Needy in India", Hastings Law Journal, Vol.55, No.4, 2004.
  26. Gupta, Surie Javidan and Chokor, "Southern Asia Cluster Where the Old Meets the New?" Journal of World Business, 37(1), 2002.
  27. Hofstede, Geert, Hofstede, J. Gert, and Michael Minkov 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3ed, 2010(차재호 나은영 공역, 세계의 문화와 조직, 제3판, 학지사, 2014).
  28. Kidder, Robert, "Formal Litigation and Professional Insecurity: Legal Entrepreneurship in South India", Law and Society Review, Vol.9, No.11, 1974-1975.
  29. Mayer, C. Adrian, "The Dominant Caste in a Region of Central India", Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol.14, 1958.
  30. Moog, Robert, "Indian Litigiousness and the Litigation Explosion: Challenging the Legend", Asian Survey, Vol.33, No.12, 1993.
  31. Patil, Deepa, "A Critical Analysis on Lok-Adalat in India", Research Front, Vol.3, No.2, 2015.
  32. Pur, Ananth Kripa, "Rivalry or Synergy? Formal and Informal Local Governance in Rural India", Development and Change, Vol.38, No.3, 2007a.
  33. Pur, Ananth Kripa and Mick Moore, "Ambiguous Institutions: Traditional Governance and Local Democracy in Rural India", Working Paper 282, Institute of Development Studies, 2007b.
  34. Ravindra, Geetha, "India: Panchayats Mediation and Lok Adalat People's Court Conciliation and the Institutionalization of ADR", Stephanie P. Stobbe (ed), Conflict Resolution in Asia: Mediation and Other Cultural Models, Lexington Books, 2018.
  35. Rosser, Colin, "An Aspect of Political Organization of Malana", Eastern Anthropologist, Vol.6, 1952.
  36. Thorner, Daniel, "Village Panchayat as a Vehicle of Change", Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol.2, No.3, 1954.
  37. Vatuk, Sylvia, "The Women's Court in India: An Alternative Dispute Resolution Body for Women in Distress", Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, Vol. 45, No.1, 2013.
  38. Whitson, Leah Sarah, "Neither Fish, Nor Flesh, Nor Good Red Herring Lok Adalats: An Experiment in Informal Dispute Resolution in India", Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 15, No.3, 1992.

Cited by

  1. 방글라데시의 분쟁해결문화와 제도: Shalish전통과 현대적 확장 vol.30, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.16998/jas.2020.30.1.139