DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Color soft contact lens and corneal thickness

  • Received : 2019.02.20
  • Accepted : 2019.04.10
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of color soft contact lenses on the corneal thickness in young Korean population. Methods: The subjects consisted of 112 eyes (7 males, 49 females) with the mean age of $20.987{\pm}1.093years$ (range 20-25 years) in young Korean population during 2018. Test was compared the corneal thickness before and after wearing color soft contact lenses. The thinnest cornea thickness(TCT), central cornea thickness(CCT), pupil centre thickness(PCT), superior corneal thickness(SCT),inferior corneal thickness(ICT), medial corneal thickness(MCT), lateral corneal thickness(LCT) of the cornea was measured using the Pentacam pachymetry. The statistically analysis was perform the Shaparo-Wilk test. Results: The right eye was a statistically significant among the CCT,LCT, MCT and TCT values(p<0.001) in the compared the corneal thickness before and after wearing soft colour contact lenses. Also the left eye was a statistically significant among the LCT and MCT values(p<0.001) in the compared the corneal thickness before and after wearing soft colour contact lenses. However, there was no statistical difference (p>0.5) in the mean PCT between before and after wearing color soft contact lenses. Conclusion: These results suggested that the color soft contact lens wear can the effect the regional thickness of cornea. Therefore, the analysis of corneal topography with Pentacam can provide correct and useful diagnostic information of the morphology of the RGP contact lens fitting and diagnosis of corneal refraction surgery.

Keywords

OSBGBC_2019_v7n1_1205_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. The mean of TCT in the right eye of a Korean subjects. P=0.020

OSBGBC_2019_v7n1_1205_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. The mean of CCT in the right eye of a Korean subjects. P=0.001

OSBGBC_2019_v7n1_1205_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. The mean of MCT in the right eye of a Korean subjects. P=0.012

OSBGBC_2019_v7n1_1205_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 4. The mean of SCT in the right eye of a Korean subjects. P=0.047

OSBGBC_2019_v7n1_1205_f0005.png 이미지

Figure 5. The mean of LCT in the right eye of a Korean subjects. P=0.044

OSBGBC_2019_v7n1_1205_f0006.png 이미지

Figure 6 The mean of LCT in the left eye of a Korean subjects. P=0.035

OSBGBC_2019_v7n1_1205_f0007.png 이미지

Figure 7. The mean of ICT in theleft eye of a Korean subjects. P=0.012

Table.1. Test of normality of corneal topography

OSBGBC_2019_v7n1_1205_t0001.png 이미지

Table.2. Analysis of corneal topography before and after wear of color soft contact lenses in young Korean population

OSBGBC_2019_v7n1_1205_t0002.png 이미지

References

  1. Ucakhan OO, Ozkan M, Kanpolat A, 2006. Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: Pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg, 32(6):970-977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.037
  2. Ponce CMP, Rocha KM, Smith SD, et al., 2009. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg, 35(6):1055-1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.022
  3. Nam SM, Im CY, Lee HK, et al. Accuracy of RTVue optical coherence tomography, Pentacam, and ultrasonic pachymetry for the measurement of central corneal thickness. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(11):2096-2103 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.002
  4. Edmonds CR, Wung SF, Pemberton B, Surrett S. Comparison of anterior chamber depth of normal and keratoconus eyes using Scheimpflug photography. Eye Contact lens.2009; 35(3) : 120-122. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0b013e31819cf5a6
  5. Jinabhia A, Radhakrishana H, O'Donnell C. Corneal changes after suspending contact lens wear in early pellucid marginal corneal degeneration and moderate keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2011; 37(2) 99-105. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0b013e31820592b1
  6. Kato N. Toda I, Kawakita T, Sakai C, Tsubota K. Topography-guided conductive keratoplasty : treatment for advanced keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010. 150(4):481-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.05.014
  7. Lam AK, Douthwaite WA. The corneal-thickness profile in Hong Kong Chinese. Cornea.1998; 17, 384-388. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199807000-00008
  8. Aj DAC, Vincent A, Vives P, Blasco F, Mico M. Assessment of corneal morphological changes induced by the use of daily disposable contact lenses., 2015, Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 22(38):28-33.
  9. Marjanovic I, Kontic D, Hentova-sencanic P, Markovic V, Bozic M. Correlation between central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in various age groups. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2010; 138(5-6): 279-286. https://doi.org/10.2298/SARH1006279M
  10. Yebra Pimentel E, Giraldez MJ, Arias FL, Gonzalez J, Gonzalez JM, Parafita MA, Febrero M. Rigid gas permeable contact lens and corneal topography, Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2001,21(3),236-242. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2001.00556.x
  11. A. Juan, LP. Antonio, A. Luis, MS. Rahhal, MS. Franciso. Anatomic study of the corneal thickness of young emmetropic subjects 2004; 23(7): 669-673. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000126323.20767.89
  12. Bohnke M, Chavanne P, Gianotti R. Continuous non-contact corneal pachymetry with a high speed reflectometer. J. Refract Surg.1998; 14, 140-146. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597X-19980301-13
  13. Feng Y, Varikooty J, Simpson TL. Diurnal variation of corneal and corneal epithelial measured using optical coherence tomography. Cornea. 2001; 20, 480-483. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200107000-00008
  14. Florian R, Anke S, Christine B, Carl E. Age-related changes in central and peripheral corneal thickness- Determination of normal values with the Orbscan II topography system. Cornea. 2007; 26(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000240095.95067.3f
  15. Cho P, Cheung SW. Repeatability of corneal thickness measurements made by a scanning slit topography system. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002; 22, 505-510. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00060.x
  16. Haque S, Simpson T, Jones L. Corneal and epithelial thickness in keratoconus : a comparison of ultrasonic pachymetry, ORBscan II, and optical coherence tomography. J Refract Surg. 2006; 22(5):486-493. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597X-20060501-11
  17. Al-Farhan HM, Al-Otaibi WM. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, ultrasound biomicroscopy, and the Artemis-2 VHF scanner in normal eyes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012; 6:1037-104. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S32955
  18. Williams R, Fink BA, King-Smith PE, Mitchell GL. Central corneal thickness measurements: using an ultrasonic instrument and 4 optical instruments. Cornea. 2011;30(11):1238-1243. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182152051
  19. Christensen A, Narvaez J, Zimmerman G. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymetry, konan noncontact optical pachymetry, and orbscan pachymetry. Cornea. 2008;27(8):862-865. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31816ed532
  20. Florian R, Anke S, Christine B, Carl E. Age-related changes in central and peripheral corneal thickness- Determination of normal values with the Orbscan II topography system. Cornea. 2007; 26(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000240095.95067.3f
  21. Farrell RA, Hart RW. On the theory of spatial organization of micromolecules in connective tissue. Bull math Biophys 1969;31: 727-760. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02477784