The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제11권3호
  • /
  • Pages.187-192
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study of fracture loads and fracture characteristics of teeth

  • Sheen, Chang-Yong (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Sciences, Seongnam Campus, Eulji University) ;
  • Dong, Jin-Keun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Brantley, William Arthur (Division of Restorative Science and Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University) ;
  • Han, David Seungho (Division of Restorative Science and Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University)
  • 투고 : 2019.01.24
  • 심사 : 2019.06.11
  • 발행 : 2019.06.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the fracture loads and modes of failure for the full range of natural teeth under simulated occlusal loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred and forty natural teeth were taken from mandibles and maxillas of patients. There were 14 groups of teeth with 10 teeth in each group (5 males and 5 females). Each specimen was embedded in resin and mounted on a positioning jig, with the long axis of the tooth at an inclined angle of 30 degrees. A universal testing machine was used to measure the compression load at which fracture of the tooth specimen occurred; loads were applied on the incisal edge and/or functional cusp. RESULTS. The mean fracture load for the mandibular first premolar was the highest (2002 N) of all the types of teeth, while the mean fracture load for the maxillary first premolar was the lowest (525 N). Mean fracture loads for the mandibular and maxillary incisors, and the first and second maxillary premolars, had significantly lower values compared to the other types of teeth. The mean fracture load for the teeth from males was significantly greater than that for the teeth from females. There was an inverse relationship between age and mean fracture load, in which older teeth had lower fracture loads compared to younger teeth. CONCLUSION. The mean fracture loads for natural teeth were significantly different, with dependence on tooth position and the sex and age of the individual.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jordan RE, Abrams L, Kraus BS. Dental anatomy and occlusion. Mosby-Year Book, 1992. p. 43-66.
  2. Habelitz S, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr, Balooch M. Mechanical properties of human dental enamel on the nanometre scale. Arch Oral Biol 2001;46:173-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(00)00089-3
  3. Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials 2002;23:2667-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00407-0
  4. Strub JR, Beschnidt SM. Fracture strength of 5 different allceramic crown systems. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:602-9.
  5. Potiket N, Chiche G, Finger IM. In vitro fracture strength of teeth restored with different all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:491-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.001
  6. Attia A, Kern M. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns luted using two bonding methods. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:247-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.12.005
  7. Al-Omiri MK, Mahmoud AA, Rayyan MR, Abu-Hammad O. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with post-retained restorations:an overview. J Endod 2010;36:1439-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.005
  8. Dong JK, Oh SC, Kim SD. Fracture strength of the IPS empress crown: The effect of occlusal depth and axial inclination on upper first premolar crowns. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1999;37:127-33.
  9. Lee IS, Kim JM, Dong JK. Fracture strength of zirconia ceramic crowns according to tooth position. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48:94-100. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.2.94
  10. Lee JH, Dong JK. Enamel thickness of maxillary first premolar. J Korean Acad Stoma Func Occl 2002;18:31-8.
  11. Shin DK, Kang HJ, Park YS, Park KS, Dong JK. Fracture strength of the IPS empress crown: the effects of incisal reduction and axial inclination on upper canine. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2005;43:30-40.
  12. Song BK, Lee HH, Dong JK. Fracture strength of the IPS empress crown. The effect of occlusal depth and axial inclination on upper central incisor. J Korean Acad Stoma Func Occl 2000;16:237-45.
  13. Nam YS, Dong JK. Fracture strength of the IPS empress crown. The effect of incisal reduction and axial inclination on lower central incisor. J Korean Acad Stomato Func Occlu 2003;19:207-17.
  14. Kim HJ, Lee HH, Nam YS, Dong JK. Fracture strength of the IPS empress crown: The effect of occlusal depth and axial inclination on lower second premolar. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2002;40:441-50.
  15. Ottl P, Hahn L, Lauer HCh, Fay M. Fracture characteristics of carbon fibre, ceramic and non-palladium endodontic post systems at monotonously increasing loads. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:175-83. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00852.x
  16. Wall JG, Reisbick MH, Johnston WM. Incisal-edge strength of porcelain laminate veneers restoring mandibular incisors. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:441-6.
  17. Oh SC. A study on morphology and size of clinical crown of permanent mandibular molar in Korean adult. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1999;37:242-55.
  18. Browning JD, Meadors LW, Eick JD. Movement of three removable partial denture clasp assemblies under occlusal loading. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:69-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90076-4
  19. Jo JH, Vang MS. Stress analysis of various esthetic restorations by finite element method. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1991;29:129-46.
  20. Stanford JW, Weigel KV, Paffenbarger GC, Sweeney WT. Compressive properties of hard tooth tissues and some restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1960;60:746-56. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1960.0258
  21. Meredith N, Sherriff M, Setchell DJ, Swanson SA. Measurement of the microhardness and Young's modulus of human enamel and dentine using an indentation technique. Arch Oral Biol 1996;41:539-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(96)00020-9