DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dynamic Precipitation and Substructure Stablility of Cu Alloy during High Temperature Deformation

  • Received : 2019.04.01
  • Accepted : 2019.06.14
  • Published : 2019.06.27

Abstract

Structural and mechanical effects of the dynamical precipitation in two copper-base alloys have been investigated over a wide range of deformation temperatures. Basing upon the information gained during the experiment, also some general conclusion may be formulated. A one concerns the nature of dynamic precipitation(DP). Under this term it is commonly understood decomposition of a supersaturated solid solution during plastic straining. The process may, however, proceed in two different ways. It may be a homogeneous one from the point of view of distribution and morphological aspect of particles or it may lead to substantial difference in shape, size and particles distribution. The effect is controlled by the mode of deformation. Hence it seems to be reasonable to distinguish DP during homogeneous deformation from that which takes place in heterogeneously deformed alloy. In the first case the process can be analyzed solely in terms of particle-dislocation-particle interrelation. Much more complex problem we are facing in heterogeneously deforming alloy. Deformation bands and specific arrangement of dislocations in form of pile-ups at grain boundaries generate additional driving force and additional nucleation sites for precipitation. Along with heterogeneous precipitation, there is a homogeneous precipitation in areas between bands of coarse slip which also deform but at much smaller rate. This form of decomposition is responsible for a specially high hardening rate during high temperature straining and for thermally stable product of the decomposition of alloy.

Keywords

References

  1. W. Yang, S. Ji, L. Huang, X. Sheng, Z. Li and M. Wang, Mater. Charact., 94, 170 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2014.05.007
  2. S. U. Rehman, M. Khan, A. Nusair Khan, M. Imran Khan, L. Ali and S. H. Imran Jaffery, J. Alloys Compd., 616, 275 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.07.116
  3. C. H. Chen, S. K. Wu and C. Y. Lai, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 613, 317 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.06.111
  4. C. Xia, W. Zhang, Z. Kang, Y. Jia, Y. Wu, R. Zhang, G. Xu and M. Wang, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 538, 295 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.047
  5. A. Deschamps, B. Decreus, F. De Geuser, T. Dorin and M. Weyland, Acta Mater., 61, 4010 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.03.015
  6. S. Mula, D. Setman, K. Youssef, R. O. Scattergood and C. C. Koch, J. Alloys Compd., 627, 108 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.114
  7. Z. Ding, S. Jia, P. Zhao, M. Deng and K. Song, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 570, 87 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.01.059
  8. P. Verma, G. Sudhakar Rao, P. Chellapandi, G. S. Mahobia, K. Chattopadhyay, N. C. Santhi Srinivas and V. Singh, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 621, 39 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.10.011
  9. Y. Ning, B. Xie, H. Li and M. W. Fu, Adv. Eng. Mater., 17, 648 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201400223
  10. A. A. Nazarov, N. A. Enikeev, A. E. Romanov, T. S. Orlova, I. V. Alexandrov, I. J. Beyerlein and R. Z. Valiev, Acta Mater., 54, 985 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.025
  11. Y. V. Milman, S. I. Chugunova, I. V. Goncharova, V. A. Goncharuk and N. A. Yefimov, Inter. J. Impact Eng., 33, 452 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.058
  12. S. To, W. B. Lee and B. Ralph, J. Mater. Sci., 29, 269 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00356603
  13. M. C. Miguel, A. Vespignani, S. Zapperi, J. Weiss and J. R. Grasso, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 309/310, 324 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01681-6
  14. R. A. Herke, N. A. Clark and M. A. Handschy, Science, 267, 651 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.267.5198.651