디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제17권6호
  • /
  • Pages.169-175
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

합류식 하수도 지역에 대형 건축물 설계시 정화조 및 전용오수관로의 비용편익분석 사례연구

A Case Study on Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Septic Tank and Exclusive Sewage Pipe Line in Designing the large Building at Combined Sewer District

  • 오현택 (청주대학교 경영학부) ;
  • 김성태 (청주대학교 경제학과) ;
  • 임병인 (충북대학교 경제학과) ;
  • 강병준 (중앙대학교 산학협력단) ;
  • 박규홍 (중앙대학교 사회기반시스템공학부)
  • Oh, Hyun-Taek (Division of Business Administration, Cheongju University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Tai (Department of Economics, Cheongju University) ;
  • Lim, Byung-In (Department of Economics, Chungbuk University) ;
  • Kang, Byong-Jun (Industry-University Cooperation Foundation, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Park, Kyoo-Hong (Department of Civil Engineering, Chung-Ang University)
  • 투고 : 2019.04.28
  • 심사 : 2019.06.20
  • 발행 : 2019.06.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 합류식 하수처리구역 내에 대형 건축물을 건설하는 경우, 정화조를 설치하는 대안과 정화조를 대신하여 전용오수관로를 설치하는 대안의 경제성을 비교분석하는 것이다. 이를 위해 우리나라 대표적 대형 건축물인 롯데월드타워의 사례를 들어 두 대안 간의 비용편익분석을 수행하였다. 롯데월드타워 건물에 정화조를 설치하는 대신에 전용오수관로를 설치할 경우, 회수기간은 6.2년, 순현재가치(NPV)는 약 61.7억 원이 발생하며, B/C비율은 1.93인 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 사례분석 결과는 향후 정화조 폐쇄에 대한 정책수립과 대형 건축물 신축 시 전용오수관로 건설에 대한 타당성을 검토할 때 적용할 수 있는 유용한 지침을 제공해 줄 것으로 보인다. 향후에는 원인자부담금과 전용오수관로 관리책임 부담여부, 악취감소에 따른 경제적 효익 등을 비용편익분석에 추가적으로 고려할 필요가 있다.

The aim of this study is to examine the relative economic benefits between the septic tank and exclusive sewage pipe line in designing the large building at combined sewer districts. With the case study of Lotte World Tower Building, we analyze a cost-benefit between two alternatives. The research results showed 2 years of payback period, about ￦6.17 billion of NPV, and 1.93 of B/C ratio for installing the exclusive sewage pipe line in comparison with septic tank. This results provide useful guidelines for policy establishment of the septic tank closure and for plausibility of installing exclusive sewage pipe line when constructing a large building. In the future, it will be necessary to consider additional cost-benefit analysis including burden charge borne by causers, the burden of management responsibility with a exclusive sewage pipe line, and the economic benefits of reducing odor.

키워드

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_169_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Measurement of distance to sewage treatment facilities

Table 1. Construction and operation cost of septic tank

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_169_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Construction costs of Plastic sewer pipe

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_169_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Summary of cost-benefit items

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_169_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. cost-benefit analysis for exclusive sewage pipe line

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_169_t0004.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. The Ministry of Environment. (2007). A study on improvement of sewerage system standards and maintenance standard in sorted sewage system. Report of The Ministry of Environment.
  2. I. J. Jeon & K. K. Kim. (2018). The development of remote monitoring system for storm overflow chamber device. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(6), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.6.061
  3. The National Law Information Center. (2018). Sewerage Act enforcement ordinance. No.24. http://www.law.go.kr.
  4. J. I. Cho. (2018). Development of optimum system for reduction of sewage odor in urban area. KOFST Issue Paper, 49, 70-77.
  5. Water Circulation Safety Bureau. (2017). Sewer maintenance basic plan in Seoul from 2000 to 2030. Report of Seoul, Korea.
  6. D. Y. Kim. (2017). An introduction to cost -benefit analysis. 17-15-1. Issue Paper of legislation assessment. Korea Legislation Research Institute.
  7. H. W. Ryu. (2018). The present condition of malodorant gases. KOFST Issue Paper, 49, 65-70.
  8. S. J. Park. (2017). A study on improvement of feasibility evaluation for public projects. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society 8(2), 163-168. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.2.163
  9. The Ministry of Environment. (2003). Instruction for cost-benefit analysis of environmental policy. Report of The Ministry of Environment.
  10. S. M. Han. (2015). The Theory and Practice of Cost-Benefit Analysis. Announcement paper. Public Investment Management Center of KDI.
  11. The Ministry of Environment. (2018). The practice tips for organization and enforcement of subsidy in sewer sector. Report of The Ministry of Environment.
  12. The Ministry of Environment. (2015). The calculating method for sewage flow rate and the processing capacity of septic tank. No. 2015-133. Announcement of the Ministry of Environment.
  13. The Ministry of Environment. (2011). Sewer facilities standards. Report of Korean Water and Wastewater Association.
  14. The Ministry of Environment. (2011). The study of projected cost for sewage treatment plants. Report of Korea Environment corporation.
  15. Yeongyang Country Office. (2015). The master plan for maintenance and improvement of sewage system. Report of Yeongyang-Gun.
  16. The Ministry of Environment. (2008). The Study of economic evaluation in planning of sewage system. Report of The Ministry of Environment.
  17. S. S. Kim. (2019.03.06.). Newspim, Real estate. http://www.newspim.com/news/view/20190 0306000379.