Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing (중환자간호학회지)

Korean Society of Critical Care Nursing (한국중환자간호학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Partners In Health Scale (PIH-K)

한국어판 자기관리 측정도구(Partners In Health scale)의 타당도 및 신뢰도 분석

  • Jeon, Mi-Kyeong (Department of Nursing, Changwon National University) ;
  • Ahn, Jung-Won (Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Park, Yeon-Hwan (College of Nursing & the Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Mi-Kyoung (College of Nursing, Eulji University)
  • 전미경 (창원대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 안정원 (중앙대학교 적십자간호대학) ;
  • 박연환 (서울대학교 간호대학, 간호과학연구소) ;
  • 이미경 (을지대학교 간호대학)
  • Received : 2019.02.08
  • Accepted : 2019.02.15
  • Published : 2019.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to validate the Korean version of Partners In Health scale (PIH-K) which is used to measure the self-management of patients with chronic illnesses in Korea. Methods : Translation of the 12-item PIH-K was conducted according to the World Health Organization guidelines. Data from 306 participants who took medicines over 3 months by doctor's prescription were collected from October to November 2017. Validity such as content validity, construct validity, and concurrent validity were conducted using content validity index (CVI), exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). To evaluate concurrent validity, the correlation coefficients between the PIH-K and concurrent scales (Self-As-Carer Inventory) were calculated. The reliability of the PIH-K was examined using the internal consistency and test-retest reliability tests. Results : The CVI of the PIH-K was 0.91. According to the CFA, factor loadings for four factors ranged from .64 to .97, which explained 67.5% of the total variance. The PIH-K was significantly correlated with concurrent variables such as those on the Self-As-Carer Inventory. The Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ was .86 and the intraclass correlation coefficient for the two-week test-retest reliability was .88. Conclusion : Findings show that the PIH-K is reliable and valid in measuring self-management of patients with chronic illnesses.

Keywords

References

  1. Battersby, M. W., Ask, A., Reece, M. M., Markwick, M. J., & Collins, J. P. (2003). The Partners in Health scale: The development and psychometric properties of a generic assessment scale for chronic condition self-management. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 9(3), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY03022
  2. Bodenheimer, T., Lorig, K., Holman, H., & Grumbach, K. (2002). Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. Journal of American Medical Association, 288(19), 2469-2475. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.19.2469
  3. Chiu, T. M. L., Tam, K. T. W., Siu, C. F., Chau, P. W. P., & Battersby, M. (2017). Validation study of a Chinese version of Partners in Health in Hong Kong (C-PIH HK). Quality of Life Research, 26(1), 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1315-5
  4. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.
  5. Evers, G. C. M. (1989). Appraisal of self-care agency A.S.A.-scale: Reliability and validity testing of the Dutch version of the A.S.A.-scale measuring Orem's concept 'Self-Care Agency'. Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum.
  6. Fitzpatrick, R., Davey, C., Buxton, M. J., & Jones, D. R. (1998). Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment, 2(14), 1-72.
  7. Geden, E., & Taylor, S. (1991). Construct and empirical validity of the self-as carer inventory. Nursing Reserarch, 40(1), 47-50.
  8. Kang, H. (2013). A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 43(5), 587-594. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587
  9. Heijmans, M., Waverijn, G., Rademakers, J., van der Vaart, R., & Rijken, M. (2015). Functional, communicative and critical health literacy of chronic disease patients and their importance for selfmanagement. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(1), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.006
  10. Holman, H., & Lorig, K. (2004). Patient selfmanagement: A key to effectiveness and efficiency in care of chronic disease. Public Health Reports, 119(3), 239-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phr.2004.04.002
  11. Kim, S-W., & Kim, K-I. (2014). Management of multimorbidity in the edely. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 57(9), 743-748. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2014.57.9.743
  12. Lawn, S., & Schoo, A. (2010). Supporting selfmanagement of chronic health conditions: Common approaches. Patient Education and Counseling, 80(2), 205-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.006
  13. Lee, K., & Shin, S. (2013). Validity of instrument development research in Korean nursing research. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 43(6), 697-703. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.6.697
  14. Lorig, K. R., & Holman, H. R. (2003). Selfmanagement education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 26(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01
  15. Miller, W. R., Lasiter, S., Ellis, R. B., & Buelow, J. M. (2015). Chronic disease self-management: A hybrid concept analysis. Nursing Outlook, 63(2), 154-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2014.07.005
  16. Orem, D. E., Taylor, S. G., & Renpenning, K. M. (1995). Nursing: Concepts of practice. St Louis, MO: Mosby.
  17. Park, T., Hong, S. B., Lim, C. M., & Koh, Y. (2010). Effect of admission time to the medical intensive care unit on acute critical patient outcomes. Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 25(2), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2010.25.2.71
  18. Park, C., Song, M., Cho, B., Lim, J., Song, W., Chang, H., & Park, Y-H. (2015). Effects of a multidisciplinary approached, empowerment theory based self-management intervention in older adults with chronic illness. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 45(2), 192-201. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2015.45.2.192
  19. Penarrieta-de Crdoova, I., Flores Barrios, F., Gutierrez-Gomes, T., del Socorro Pinonez-Martinez, M., Maria Quintero-Valle, L., & Castaneda-Hidalgo, H. (2014). Self-management in chronic conditions: Partners in health scale instrument validation. Nursing Management-UK, 20(10), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.7748/nm2014.02.20.10.32.e1084
  20. Petkov, J., Harvey, P., & Battersby, M. (2010). The internal consistency and construct validity of the partners in health scale: Validation of a patient rated chronic condition self-management measure. Quality of Life Research, 19(7), 1079-1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9661-1
  21. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  22. Smith, D., Harvey, P., Lawn, S., Harris, M., & Battersby, M. (2017). Measuring chronic condition self-management in an Australian community: Factor structure of the revised Partners in Health (PIH) scale. Quality of Life Research, 26(1), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1368-5
  23. Sohn, M., Kim, H-K., Rhe, H-S., & Choi, M. (2018). Association between multi-morbidity and health care expenditure or catastrophic health expenditures of South Korean adults. The Korean Journal of Health Economics and Policy, 24(3), 49-75.
  24. Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (2015). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (5th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  25. Woo, J. P. (2012). The concept and understanding of structural equation model. Seoul: Hannarae.
  26. World Health Organization. (2012). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Retrieved January 17, 2019, from https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/
  27. Xiaofei, Z., Hui, F., Lawn, S. J., Mei, S., Smith, D., Jingxia, W., . . . Siyuan, T. (2017). Translation and initial psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the partners in health scale. Biomedical Research, 28(16), 7322-7329.