References
- 구재선 (2018). 한국판 긍정적 및 부정적 경험 척도(SPANE): 요인구조 및 성별 측정 동일성. 감성과학, 21(3), 103-114.
- 구재선, 김의철 (2006). 한국인의 행복 경험에 대한 토착문화심리학적 접근. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 12(2), 77-100.
- 김완석, 김영진 (1997). 주관적 안녕 척도: 공동생활 및 활동과의 관련. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 3(1), 61-81.
- 김주환, 김민규, 홍세희 (2009). 구조방정식모형으로 논문 쓰기. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스.
- 서은국, 구재선 (2011). 단축형 행복 척도(COMOSWB) 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(1), 95-113.
- 임낭연, 이화령, 서은국 (2010). 한국에서의 Diener의 삶의 만족 척도 (Satisfaction With Life Scale: SWLS) 사용 연구 개관. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 29(1), 21-47.
- 임영진 (2012). 한국판 삶의 만족도 척도의 신뢰도와 타당도: 경찰공무원, 대학생, 청소년을 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 31(3), 877-896.
- 조명한, 차경호 (1998). 삶의 질에 대한 국가적 비교. 서울: 집문당.
- 한규석, 신수진 (1999). 한국인의 선호가치 변화-수직적 집단주의에서 수평적 개인주의로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 13(2), 293-310.
- 한민, 최인철, 김범준, 이훈진 (2012). 한국 대학생의 성차: 정서, 사고방식, 가치관을 중심으로. 조사연구, 13(3), 33-62.
- 홍세희 (2000). 구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 161-177.
- Bai, X., Wu, C., Zheng, R., & Ren, X. (2011). The psychometric evaluation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale using a nationally representative sample of China. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 183-197.
- Byrne, B. M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less traveled. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 272-300.
- Byrne, B. M. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20, 872-882.
- Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthen, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.
- Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504.
- Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodnessof-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
- Clench-Aas, J., Nes, R. B., Dalgard, O. S., & Aaro, L. E. (2011). Dimensionality and measurement invariance in the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Norway. Quality of Life Research, 20(8), 1307-1317.
- Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.
- Diener, E., Emmons, R. S., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
- Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-302.
- Emerson, S. D., Guhn, M., & Gadermann, A. M. (2017). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Reviewing three decades of research. Quality of Life Research, 26, 2251-2264.
- Esnaola, I., Benito, M., Antonio-Agirre, I., Freeman, J., & Sarasa, M. (2017). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) by country, gender and age. Psicothema, 29(4), 596-601.
- Glaesmer, H., Grande, G., Braehler, E., & Roth, M. (2011). The German Version of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 127-132.
- Hultell, D., & Gustavsson, J. P. (2008). A psychometric evaluation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a Swedish nationwide sample of university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1070-1079.
- Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
- Lucas, R. E., & Gohm, C. L. (2000). Age and sex differences in subjective well-being across cultures. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being, (pp. 291-318.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Moksnes, U. K., Lohre, A., Byrne, D. G., & Haugan, G. (2014). Satisfaction with Life Scale in Adolescents: Evaluation of factor structure and gender invariance in a Norwegian sample. Social Indicators Research, 118, 657-671.
- Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction With Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137-152.
- Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2009). Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 101-117). NY: Springer Science.
- Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149-161.
- Pavot, W., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1998). The Temporal Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 340-354.
- Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Development Psychology, 9, 486-492.
- Tomas, J. M., Gutierrez, M., Sancho, P., & Romero, I. (2015). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) by gender and age in Angola. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 182-186.
- Wu, A. D., Li, Z., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007) Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(3), 1-26.
- Wu, C., & Yao, G. (2006). Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1259-1268.