DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

과거 잘못에 대한 집단 간 사과의 역설적 효과: 외집단 비인간화를 중심으로

Ingroup's Apology For Past Wrongdoing Can Increase Outgroup Dehumanization

  • Hyeon Jeong Kim (Department of Psychology, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Sang Hee Park (Department of Psychology, Chungbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.11.26
  • 심사 : 2019.02.22
  • 발행 : 2019.02.28

초록

사과는 집단 간 갈등 후 집단의 손상된 관계를 개선하기 위해 빈번히 사용된다. 과거 연구들은 가해 집단의 구성원들이 내집단의 가해 사실과 연관된 죄책감과 책임감에 대처하기 위해 피해자 집단 구성원들을 비인간화한다는 것을 밝혔다. 본 연구에서는 피해 집단에 사과를 했을 때 가해 집단 구성원이 과거 가해사실로 인해 느끼는 도덕적 위협이 줄어들고 그러므로 피해 집단 구성원에 대한 비인간화도 줄어들 것이라는 가설을 세웠다. 본 연구는 과거 한국군의 베트남전 참전 당시의 베트남 민간인 학살 사건의 맥락을 사용하여 실행되었다. 한국인 참가자들은 한국 정부의 공식적인 사과 여부가 조작된 기사를 읽고 사건에 대한 생각과 베트남 사람들에 대한 비인간화 등 베트남 사람들을 어떻게 생각하는지에 대해 보고했다. 연구 결과, 사과가 안도감을 높임으로서 비인간화의 감소를 일으키는 매개 효과가 관찰되었지만, 전체적으로는 가설과 반대로 사과가 오히려 베트남 사람들에 대한 비인간화를 강화시켰다. 본 연구는 집단 간 사과의 역설적인 효과를 밝혀냈으며 집단 간 긴장을 누그러뜨리기 위한 전략으로써 사과를 고려하기 전에 사과의 결과에 대한 세밀한 검증이 필요하다는 사실을 밝혔다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

Apologies are used with increasing frequency for mending damaged relations between groups after intergroup conflict. Past research revealed that members of a perpetrator group may engage in (animalistic) dehumanization of victim group members to cope with guilt and responsibility associated with the ingroup's past wrongdoing. We hypothesized that ingroup's apology would relieve perpetrator group members of the moral threat, and therefore would make them perceive more humanness in the victim group members. The study was conducted in the context of South Korea's alleged atrocities against Vietnamese civilians during its military involvement in the Vietnam War. Korean participants read an article on the incidents with Korean government's issuance of an official apology manipulated, and reported their thoughts on the incidents and perceptions of Vietnamese people including their humanness. Contrary to our prediction, apology further enhanced dehumanization of Vietnamese people, even while it also decreased dehumanization through heightened feelings of relief. This study documents a seemingly ironic effect of intergroup apology, and calls for a more careful examination of the consequences of apology before recommending it as a viable strategy for alleviating intergroup tensions.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김혜숙, 고재홍, 안미영, 안상수, 이선이, 최인철 (2003). 다수 집단과 소수 집단에 대한 고정관념의 내용: 유능성과 따뜻함의 차원에서의 분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 17(3), 121-143.
  2. Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00270.x
  3. Bandura, A., Underwood, B., & Fromson, M. E. (1975). Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims. Journal of Research in Personality, 9(4), 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(75)90001-X
  4. Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2010). Excluded from humanity: The dehumanizing effects of social ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.022
  5. Besley, T., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2014). The legacy of historical conflict: Evidence from Africa. American Political Science Review, 108(02), 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000161
  6. Blatz, C. W., & Philpot, C. (2010). On the outcomes of intergroup apologies: A review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(11), 995-1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00318.x
  7. Blatz, C. W., Schumann, K., & Ross, M. (2009). Government apologies for historical injustices. Political Psychology, 30(2), 219-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00689.x
  8. Hayes, Andrew F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  9. Brown, R., & Cehajic, S. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: Mediators of the effects of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(4), 669-684. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.466
  10. Brown, R. P., Wohl, M. J. A., & Exline, J. J. (2008). Taking up offenses: Secondhand forgiveness and group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), 1406-1419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208321538
  11. Castano, E., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 804-818. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.804
  12. Cehajic, S., Brown, R., & Gonzalez, R. (2009). What do I care? Perceived ingroup responsibility and dehumanization as predictors of empathy felt for the victim group. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(6), 715-729. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209347727
  13. Cortes, B. P., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez, R. T., Rodriguez, A. P., & Leyens, J.-P. (2005). Infrahumanization or Familiarity? Attribution of uniquely human emotions to the self, the ingroup, and the outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271421
  14. Cuddy, A. J. C., Rock, M. S., & Norton, M. I. (2007). Aid in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina: Inferences of secondary emotions and intergroup helping. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(1), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207071344
  15. De Greiff, P. (Ed.). (2006). The handbook of reparations. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
  16. Exline, J. J., Deshea, L., & Holeman, V. T. (2007). Is apology worth the risk? Predictors, outcomes, and ways to avoid regret. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(4), 479-504. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2007.26.4.479
  17. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
  18. Goff, P. A., Eberhardt, J. L., Williams, M. J., & Jackson, M. C. (2008). Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 292-306. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292
  19. Greitemeyer, T., & McLatchie, N. (2011). Denying humanness to others: A newly discovered mechanism by which violent video games increase aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 22(5), 659-665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611403320
  20. Griffiths, J. (2018, 2, 24). The "forgotten" My Lai: South Korea's Vietnam War massacres. CNN. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2018/02/23/asia/south-korea-vietnam-massacre-intl/index.html
  21. Hanke, K., Liu, J. H., Hilton, D. J., Bilewicz, M., Garber, I., Huang, L.-L., ... Wang, F. (2013). When the past haunts the present: Intergroup forgiveness and historical closure in post World War II societies in Asia and in Europe. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37(3), 287-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.05.003
  22. Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252-264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
  23. Haslam, N., & Bain, P. (2007). Humanizing the self: Moderators of the attribution of lesser humanness to others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206293191
  24. Haslam, N., Bain, P., Douge, L., Lee, M., & Bastian, B. (2005). More human than you: Attributing humanness to self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 937-950. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.937
  25. Kteily, N., Bruneau, E., Waytz, A., & Cotterill, S. (2015). The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 901-931. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000048
  26. Lastrego, S., & Licata, L. (2010). "Should a country's leaders apologize for its past misdeeds?" An analysis of the effects of both public apologies from a Belgian official and perception of Congolese victims' continued suffering on Belgians' representations of colonial action, support for reparation, and attitudes towards the Congolese. Revista de Psicologia Social, 25(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347410790193432
  27. Leidner, B., Castano, E., Zaiser, E., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2010). Ingroup glorification, moral disengagement, and justice in the context of collective violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(8), 1115-1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210376391
  28. Leonard, D. J., Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2011). Emotional responses to intergroup apology mediate intergroup forgiveness and retribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1198-1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.002
  29. Leyens, J.-P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., & Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 186-197. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_06
  30. MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2012). Intergroup bias toward "Group X": Evidence of prejudice, dehumanization, avoidance, and discrimination against asexuals. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(6), 725-743. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212442419
  31. Nadler, A., & Liviatan, I. (2006). Intergroup reconciliation: Effects of adversary's expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients' trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 459-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205276431
  32. Okimoto, T. G., Wenzel, M., & Hornsey, M. J. (2015). Apologies demanded yet devalued: Normative dilution in the age of apology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 133-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.05.008
  33. Peetz, J., Gunn, G. R., & Wilson, A. E. (2010). Crimes of the past: Defensive temporal distancing in the face of past In-group wrongdoing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(5), 598-611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210364850
  34. Philpot, C. R., & Hornsey, M. J. (2008). What happens when groups say sorry: The effect of intergroup apologies on their recipients. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 474-487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207311283
  35. Roccas, S., Klar, Y., & Liviatan, I. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group's moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 698-711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.698
  36. Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 116-132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.116
  37. Singer, P. (2011). The expanding circle: Ethics, evolution, and moral progress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  38. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-37). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  39. Viki, G. T., Fullerton, I., Raggett, H., Tait, F., & Wiltshire, S. (2012). The role of dehumanization in attitudes toward the social exclusion and rehabilitation of sex offenders: Dehumanization and sex offenders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(10), 2349-2367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00944.x
  40. Viki, G. T., Osgood, D., & Phillips, S. (2013). Dehumanization and self-reported proclivity to torture prisoners of war. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 325-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.006
  41. Wohl, M. J. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 288-303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.288
  42. Wohl, M. J. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Klar, Y. (2006). Collective guilt: Emotional reactions when one's group has done wrong or been wronged. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280 600574815
  43. Yang, W., Jin, S., He, S., Fan, Q., & Zhu, Y. (2015). The impact of power on humanity: Self-dehumanization in powerlessness. PLOS ONE, 10(5), e0125721. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125721