DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improving the diagnosis of high grade and stage bladder cancer by detecting increased urinary calprotectin expression in tumor tissue and tumor-associated inflammatory response

  • Received : 2019.01.28
  • Accepted : 2019.06.17
  • Published : 2019.09.22

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether measurement of urinary calprotectin can serve as a biomarker in the diagnosis of primary bladder cancer and to confirm its diagnostic role in determining high grade and stage disease. Materials and Methods: Urinary calprotectin was measured in spot urine samples from patients with primary bladder cancer and control subjects. To confirm levels in urine, tissue samples were also obtained from bladder tumor and healthy trigone of bladder by transurethral resection in both groups. Finally, calprotectin levels in tissue and urine of the patients and control subjects were compared and their diagnostic potential was investigated in high grade and stage bladder cancers. Results: Of 82 participants, 52 were patients with bladder cancer and 30 were control subjects. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, smoking status, and comorbidities. Tissue and urinary calprotectin levels were significantly higher in the bladder cancer group. In subgroup analyses, urinary calprotectin levels were significantly higher in patients with high-grade, muscle-invasive tumors. After receiver operating characteristic analyses, the sensitivity and specificity of urinary calprotectin was 100% and 96.7%, respectively, in the diagnosis of primary bladder cancer. High grade and stage bladder cancers were detected with sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 74.2%, and 80% and 84.8%, respectively. Conclusions: Urinary calprotectin may be a valuable parameter in the diagnosis of primary bladder cancer with high sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, it may be useful in the prediction of high grade and stage disease. However, more investigations are needed.

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2018;136:E359-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210
  2. Comperat E, Larre S, Roupret M, Neuzillet Y, Pignot G, Quintens H, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of urothelial bladder cancer in patients less than 40 years old. Virchows Arch 2015;466:589-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1739-2
  3. Burger M, Catto JW, Dalbagni G, Grossman HB, Herr H, Karakiewicz P, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2013;63:234-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.033
  4. Wakai K, Utsumi T, Oka R, Endo T, Yano M, Kamijima S, et al. Clinical predictors for high-grade bladder cancer before firsttime transurethral resection of the bladder tumor: a retrospective cohort study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2016;46:964-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyw111
  5. Yafi FA, Brimo F, Auger M, Aprikian A, Tanguay S, Kassouf W. Is the performance of urinary cytology as high as reported historically? A contemporary analysis in the detection and surveillance of bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2014;32:27.e1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.09.011
  6. Schmitz-Drager BJ, Droller M, Lokeshwar VB, Lotan Y, Hudson MA, van Rhijn BW, et al. Molecular markers for bladder cancer screening, early diagnosis, and surveillance: the WHO/ICUD consensus. Urol Int 2015;94:1-24. https://doi.org/10.1159/000369357
  7. Nagata M, Muto S, Horie S. Molecular Biomarkers in bladder cancer: novel potential indicators of prognosis and treatment outcomes. Dis Markers 2016;2016:8205836.
  8. Nandagopal L, Sonpavde G. Circulating biomarkers in bladder cancer. Bladder Cancer 2016;2:369-79. https://doi.org/10.3233/BLC-160075
  9. Ebbing J, Mathia S, Seibert FS, Pagonas N, Bauer F, Erber B, et al. Urinary calprotectin: a new diagnostic marker in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. World J Urol 2014;32:1485-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1227-8
  10. Yasar O, Akcay T, Obek C, Turegun FA. Significance of S100A8, S100A9 and calprotectin levels in bladder cancer. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2017;77:437-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2017.1336567
  11. Paner GP, Stadler WM, Hansel DE, Montironi R, Lin DW, Amin MB. Updates in the eighth edition of the tumor-nodemetastasis staging classification for urologic cancers. Eur Urol 2018;73:560-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.018
  12. Montironi R, Lopez-Beltran A. The 2004 WHO classification of bladder tumors: a summary and commentary. Int J Surg Pathol 2005;13:143-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/106689690501300203
  13. Striz I, Trebichavsky I. Calprotectin - a pleiotropic molecule in acute and chronic inflammation. Physiol Res 2004;53:245-53.
  14. Rugtveit J, Brandtzaeg P, Halstensen TS, Fausa O, Scott H. Increased macrophage subset in inflammatory bowel disease: apparent recruitment from peripheral blood monocytes. Gut 1994;35:669-74. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.35.5.669
  15. Roseth AG, Kristinsson J, Fagerhol MK, Schjonsby H, Aadland E, Nygaard K, et al. Faecal calprotectin: a novel test for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer? Scand J Gastroenterol 1993;28:1073-6.
  16. Tibble JA, Sigthorsson G, Foster R, Scott D, Fagerhol MK, Roseth A, et al. High prevalence of NSAID enteropathy as shown by a simple faecal test. Gut 1999;45:362-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.45.3.362
  17. Kim SK, Kim EJ, Leem SH, Ha YS, Kim YJ, Kim WJ. Identification of S100A8-correlated genes for prediction of disease progression in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. BMC Cancer 2010;10:21.
  18. Minami S, Sato Y, Matsumoto T, Kageyama T, Kawashima Y, Yoshio K, et al. Proteomic study of sera from patients with bladder cancer: usefulness of S100A8 and S100A9 proteins. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2010;7:181-9.
  19. Luley K, Noack F, Lehnert H, Homann N. Local calprotectin production in colorectal cancer and polyps--active neutrophil recruitment in carcinogenesis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011;26:603-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1165-0
  20. Gisbert JP, McNicholl AG. Questions and answers on the role of faecal calprotectin as a biological marker in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Liver Dis 2009;41:56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2008.05.008
  21. Tibble JA, Sigthorsson G, Foster R, Forgacs I, Bjarnason I. Use of surrogate markers of inflammation and Rome criteria to distinguish organic from nonorganic intestinal disease. Gastroenterology 2002;123:450-60. https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2002.34755
  22. Poullis A, Foster R, Shetty A, Fagerhol MK, Mendall MA. Bowel inflammation as measured by fecal calprotectin: a link between lifestyle factors and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:279-84. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-03-0160
  23. Ortega FJ, Sabater M, Moreno-Navarrete JM, Pueyo N, Botas P, Delgado E, et al. Serum and urinary concentrations of calprotectin as markers of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Eur J Endocrinol 2012;167:569-78. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-12-0374
  24. Wong YNS, Joshi K, Khetrapal P, Ismail M, Reading JL, Sunderland MW, et al. Urine-derived lymphocytes as a noninvasive measure of the bladder tumor immune microenvironment. J Exp Med 2018;215:2748-59. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20181003
  25. Bausch K, Roth E, Heinz S, Horst D, Mathia S, Vlajnic T, et al. Urinary Calprotectin loses specificity as tumour marker due to sterile leukocyturia associated with bladder cancer. PLoS One 2019;14:e0213549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213549