Journal of Convergence for Information Technology (융합정보논문지)

Convergence Society for SMB (중소기업융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Analysis Model for Weapon Acquisition Alternatives

국방 무기체계 획득방안 연구 방법론 제안

  • Lee, Ji-Young (Defense Agency for Technology and Quality(DTaQ))
  • Received : 2019.05.22
  • Accepted : 2019.06.20
  • Published : 2019.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, it is expected for requirement for more scientific research of weapon systems acquisition alternatives with reliability and objectivity. For these needs, study on methodology of weapon systems acquisition alternatives is but on-going, but it is still in its early stages and is unprofessional. We compared general decision making methods, government development program decision making methods, methodologies of weapon systems acquisition alternatives research such as AHP, ANP, KAAM and proposed AHP as weapon acquisition analysis. This study guarantees objectivity and derives scientific research results reliability by analyzing and comparing comprehensive elements such as cost, effectiveness, deployment schedule, program management risk. Further study on AHP weight and other decision making methods is needed considering category of weapon systems and program characteristics.

최근 획득방안 도출을 위한 선행연구 조사 분석의 객관성 및 신뢰성이 확보된 과학적 결과에 대한 요구가 증대되고 있다. 이러한 요구에 따라 획득방안 연구 방법론에 대한 검토가 진행되고는 있으나, 아직까지는 초기 단계이며 비 전문적인 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 실무에 활용할 수 있도록 일반적인 의사결정 방법 및 국가 연구 개발 사업 의사 결정 방법, 현재 활용 중인 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process), ANP(Analytic Network Process), KAAM(Knowledge-based Alternative Analysis Model) 등의 무기체계 획득 방안 연구 방법론 등을 비교하여 무기체계 획득방안 연구에 가장 적합한 AHP 기법을 방법론으로 제안하였다. AHP 항목으로 비용, 효과, 전력화 시기, 사업 관리 위험 등의 종합적인 요소들을 비교 분석함으로써 무기체계 획득방안 연구의 객관성과 신뢰성을 높이고, 정량적인 비교 분석으로써 과학적인 결과를 도출하였다. 본 연구를 통해 AHP를 활용하여 보다 무기체계 획득방안을 과학적이고 정량적으로 비교 분석할 수 있게 기여하였다.

Keywords

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n6_91_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Procedure of Acquisition Alternatives Analysis

Table 1. Advantages and Disadvantages of Decision Methods

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n6_91_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Proposed Comparing Contents for Analysis of Weapon Acquisition Alternatives

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n6_91_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Weight of Comparing Contents of OO System Acquisition Alternatives

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n6_91_t0003.png 이미지

References

  1. DAPA. (2017). Defense Acquisition Program Act, RoK DAPA. [cited 2017 July 26], Available From: http://www.dapa.go.kr/dapa/main.do (accessed Apr. 20, 2019).
  2. M. Majumder. (2015). Impact of Urbanization on Water Shortage in Face of Climatic Aberrations. pp.37-45, Springer Singapore. DOI : 10.1007/978-981-4560-73-3
  3. MSIT. (2018). Preliminary Feasibility Study Guideline for Government R&D Program.
  4. KISTEP. (2018). Preliminary Feasibility Study Standard Guideline for R&D Projects.
  5. DAPA. (2019). Defense Acquisition Program Management Regualation.
  6. S. Lee. (2018). An Empirical Study on Decision Making Support System for Weapons System Acquisition Selection. Master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  7. H. Eun. (2001). An Application of the AHP to the Selection of Airplane Type. Ph.D dissertation, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
  8. H. Seol, G. Kim, H. Jung, H. Cho & C. Hwang. (2009). A Study on the Selection of Alternatives for Flight Attendants to Adapt Flying Conditions using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of KIMST, Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 12(4), 460-468.
  9. Y. Lee & G. Kwon. (2019). Decision Making Framework for Knowledge Management Using Analytic Network Process. Conference of Korea Management Science, Korean Operations Research and Management Society. (pp. 1429-1436).
  10. S. Jung. (2000). An Analytic Network Process Model for the Evaluating Weapon System. Master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul.
  11. H. Jo. (2012). Development of Decision Making Models for Purchasing Foreign Weapon Systems. Ph.D dissertation, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea.
  12. K. Park, K. Lee, C. Kim & S. Choi. (2007). A Study on Knowledge-based Alternatives Analysis Model (KAAM) for the Best Decision Making in Weapon Systems Acquisition. Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea, 33(1), 2007.
  13. S. T. Park, S. J. Lee & Y. K. Kim. (2011). Weight Differences of Patent Valuation Factors by Industries. Journal of Digital Convergence, 9(3), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2011.9.3.105