Journal of Korea Trade

Korea Trade Research Association (한국무역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Macroeconomic Buffer Effects of Mega-FTA Formation: A CGE Analysis for Korea

  • Jung, Jae-Won (Research Division, Korea Economic Research Institute, THEMA, University of Cergy-Pontoise) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Hwang (Department of International Business and Trade, Myongji University)
  • Received : 2019.04.07
  • Accepted : 2019.05.20
  • Published : 2019.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose - As global trade disputes intensify and global trade uncertainty increases due to the prevailing trade protectionism all over the world, mega-FTAs such as the RCEP and CPTPP are suggested as strategic trade policy options for export-driven small open economies, such as Korea. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of Korea's mega-FTA participation and the induced implications for the Korean economy. Design/methodology - We use a multi-region, multi-sector global CGE model, and investigate the different effects of both the US-China and US-EU trade wars on the relative changes in GDP, welfare, and trade under different trade policy regimes; (i) Korea does not participate in any mega-FTA, (ii) Korea participates in the RCEP, and (iii) Korea participates in the CPTPP. Findings - We show, among others, that though industrial effects might be largely varied, the overall enlarging of free trade zones through multilateral mega-FTA participation may contribute significantly to the macroeconomic soundness and stability of Korea, even when global trade protectionism prevails. Under RCEP and CPTPP trade regimes, Korea's GDP may increase even when the global trade environment deteriorates as trade wars occur and intensify between the US and China, or between the US and EU. It is also estimated that RCEP participation increases Korea's GDP, welfare (measured in equivalent variation), and total trade by 1.12%, $1.09 billion, and 2.54%, respectively, while CPTPP participation increases them by 0.19%, $0.92 billion, and 0.13%, respectively. Originality/value - Existing studies usually focus on the direct impacts of mega-FTA participation on macroeconomic variables such as GDP, welfare, and trade, and do not consider the possible buffer effects of a mega-FTA when the global trade environment worsens. In this paper, we analyze and quantify not only the direct impacts of RCEP and CPTPP on the main macroeconomic variables but also the possible buffer effects of the RCEP and CPTPP in the cases of the US-China and US-EU trade wars.

Keywords

References

  1. Aggarwal, V. K. (2016), Mega-FTAs and the Trade-Security Nexus: The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) (Asia Pacific Issue Paper, No. 123), Honolulu, HI: East-West Center, 1-8.
  2. Baldwin, R. E. (2006), Globalisation: The Great Unbundling(s) (Research Paper, No. 2006-09), Helsinki: Economic Council of Finland, 5-47.
  3. Baldwin, R. E. and A. J. Venables (1995), "Regional Economic Integration". In G. M. Grossman and K. Rogoff (Eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1597-1644.
  4. Francois, J. F. and K. A. Reinert (1998), Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis: A Handbook, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Ginsburgh, V. and M. Keyzer (2002), The Structure of Applied General Equilibrium Models, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  6. Grossman, G. M. and E. Rossi-Hansberg (2008), "Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring", American Economic Review, 98, 1978-1997. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.5.1978
  7. Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP), Data Base. Available from https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/ (accessed March 21, 2019)
  8. Ji, X., P. B. Rana, W. M. Chia and C. Li (2018), "Post-TPP Trade Policy Options for ASEAN and its Dialogue Partners: Preference Ordering Using CGE Analysis", East Asian Economic Review, 22(2), 177-215. https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2018.22.2.342
  9. Jung, Jae-Won (2017), "Openness, Productivity and Welfare with Heterogeneous Firms", Journal of Korea Trade, 21(4), 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKT-06-2017-0063
  10. Jung, Jae-Won (2018), The Effects of RCEP on the Korean Economy, Seoul: KERI.
  11. Jung, Jae-Won (2019), "Introducing Roy-like Worker Assignment into Computable General Equilibrium Models", Applied Economics Letters, 1-8, DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2019.1637510
  12. Kawasaki, K. (2017), Emergent Uncertainty in Regional Integration: Economic Impacts of Alternative RTA Scenarios (GRIPS Discussion Paper, No.16-28), Tokyo: National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, 1-21.
  13. La, Mee-Ryung (2017), An Analysis of RCEP Value Chains and Policy Implications, Sejong, Korea: KIEP.
  14. Li, Q., R. Scollay and J. Gilbert (2017), "Analyzing the Effects of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership on FDI in a CGE Framework with Firm Heterogeneity", Economic Modelling, 67, 409-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.07.016
  15. Melitz, M. J. (2003), "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity", Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
  16. Petri, P. A., M. G. Plummer, S. Urata and F. Zhai (2017), Going It Alone in the Asia-Pacific: Regional Trade Agreements without the United States (PIIE Working Paper, No. 17-10), Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 1-17.
  17. Selvarajan, S. K. and R. Ab-Rahim (2017), "Economic Liberalization and Its Link to Convergence: Empirical Evidence from RCEP and TPPA Countries", International Journal of Business and Society, 18(3), 439-460. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3122.2017
  18. Shoven, J. B. and J. Whalley (1992), Applying General Equilibrium, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Solis, M. and J. D. Wilson (2017), "From APEC to Mega-Regionals: The Evolution of the Asia-Pacific Trade Architecture", The Pacific Review, 30(6), 923-937. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1305438
  20. Wilson, J. D. (2015), "Mega-Regional Trade Deals in the Asia-Pacific: Choosing Between the TPP and RCEP?", Journal of Contemporary Asia, 45(2), 345-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2014.956138