Computers and Concrete

  • 제23권6호
  • /
  • Pages.459-470
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1598-8198(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-818X(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Selecting optimized mix proportion of bagasse ash blended high performance concrete using analytical hierarchy process (AHP)

  • Praveenkumar, S. (Department of Civil Engineering, PSG College of Technology) ;
  • Sankarasubramanian, G. (Department of Civil Engineering, PSG College of Technology) ;
  • Sindhu, S. (Department of Civil Engineering, PSG College of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2018.12.29
  • 심사 : 2019.05.01
  • 발행 : 2019.06.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Apart from strength properties, durability, toughness and workability are also important criteria in defining the performance of a concrete structure. Hence "High Performance Concrete (HPC)" is introduced. It is different from high strength concrete and can have various applications. In this paper, the properties (Mechanical and Durability) of High Performance Concrete blended with bagasse ash at 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% are studied. However, it is difficult to analyze the performance based on different properties obtained from different experiments. Hence it is necessary to combine all the criteria/properties into a single value to obtain a result by a technique called Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP).It is an effective tool for dealing with complex decision making, and may aid the decision maker to set priorities and make the best decision. In addition, the AHP incorporates a useful technique for checking the consistency of the decision maker?s evaluations, thus reducing the bias in the decision making process.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Balali, V., Zahraie, B. and Roozbahani, A. (2014), "A comparison of AHP and PROMETHEE family decision making methods for selection of building structural system", Am. J. Civil Eng. Arch., 2(5), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajcea-2-5-1
  2. Chakladar, N.D. and Chakraborty, S. (2008), "A combined TOPSIS-AHP method based approach for non-traditional machining processes selection", J. Eng. Manuf., 222(12), 1613-1623. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM1238.
  3. Ebrahimi, M., Hedayat, A.A. and Fakhrabadi, H. (2018), "Selecting optimized concrete structure by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)", Comput. Concrete, 22(3), 327-336. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.22.3.327.
  4. Ho, W. and Ma, X. (2018), "The state-of-the-art-integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process", Eur. J. Oper. Res., 267(2), 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.007.
  5. Hruska, R., Prusa, P. and Babic, D. (2014), "The use of AHP method for selection of supplier", Transp., 29(2), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2014.930928.
  6. Hudymacova, M., Benkova, M., Pocsova, J. and Skovranek, T. (2010), "Supplier selection based on multi-criterial AHP method", Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 15(3), 249-255.
  7. Ince, M., Yigit, T. and Isik, A.H. (2017), "AHP-TOPSIS method for learning object metadata evaluation", Int. J. Inform. Edu. Technol., 7(12), 884-887. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.12.989.
  8. Ishizaka, A. and Labib, A. (2009), "Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice: Benefits and limitations", Or Insight, 22(4), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1057/ori.2009.10.
  9. Jin, C.H. (2014), "Research on the risk evaluation of construction stage base on analytical hierarchy process for building engineering projects", Adv. Mater. Res., 1046, 135-138. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1046.135.
  10. Kamaakchaoui, C., Azmani, A., El Jarroudi, M. and Laghmari, G. (2016), "The selecting of complementary products using the AHP method", ESMB, 6, 1-6.
  11. Karim, R. and Karmaker, C.L. (2016), "Machine selection by AHP and TOPSIS methods", Am. J. Indus. Eng., 4(1), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajie-4-1-2.
  12. Lin, C.C., Wang, W.C. and Yu, W.D. (2008), "Improving AHP for construction with an adaptive AHP approach (A3)", Auto. Constr., 17(2), 180-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2007.03.004.
  13. Lin, S.C.J., Ali, A.S. and Bin Alias, A. (2015), "Analytic hierarchy process decision-making framework for procurement strategy selection in building maintenance work", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 29(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000529.
  14. Mansor, M.R., Sapuan, S.M., Zainudin, E.S., Nuraini, A.A. and Hambali, A. (2013), "Hybrid natural and glass fibers reinforced polymer composites material selection using Analytical Hierarchy Process for automotive brake lever", Mater. Des., 51, 484-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.072.
  15. Qodsi Pour, H. (2013), Analytical Hierarchy Process, Issues About Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, 11th Edition, Amirkabir Industrial University, Tehran, Iran.
  16. Rao, R.V. and Davim, J.P. (2008), "A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method", Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 35, 751-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0752-7.
  17. Rouyendegh, B.D. and Erkan, T.E. (2012), "Selecting the best supplier using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method", Afr. J. Busin. Manage., 6(4), 1455-1462. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.2009.
  18. Saaty, T.L. (1988), What is the Analytic Hierarchy Process?, Mathematical Models for Decision Support, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
  19. Saaty, T.L. (1990), "How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process", Eur. J. Oper. Res., 48(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.
  20. Sapun, S.M., Kho, J.Y., Zainudin, E.S., Lenman, Z., Ahmed Ali, B.A. and Hambali, A. (2011), "Materials selection for natural fibre reinforced polymer composites using analytical hierarchy process", Ind. J. Eng. Mater. Sci., 18(4), 255-267.
  21. Shi, L., Zhang, R.F., Xie, Q.Y. and Fu, L.H. (2009), "Improving Analytic Hierarchy Process applied to fire risk analysis of public building", Chin. Sci. Bull., 54(8), 1442-1450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-009-0056-z.
  22. Socaciu, L., Giurgiu, O., Banyai, D. and Simion, M. (2016), "PCM selection using AHP method to maintain thermal comfort of the vehicle occupants", Energy Procedia, 85, 489-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.12.232.
  23. Triantaphyllou, E. and Mann, S.H. (1995), "Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges", Int. J. Indus. Eng.: Appl. Pract., 2(1), 35-44.
  24. Vaidya, O.S. and Kumar, S. (2006), "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications", Eur. J. Oper. Res., 169(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028.
  25. Venkata Rao, R. (2008), "Evaluating flexible manufacturing systems using a combined multiple attribute decision making method", Int. J. Prod. Res., 46(7), 1975-1989. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540601011519.
  26. Vichare, V.K., Aher, M.C. and Devalkar, R.V. (2015), "Application of analytical hierarchy process in construction of residential building project", IJMTER, 2(7), 862-867.
  27. Wong, J.K.W. and Li, H. (2008), "Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems", Build. Environ., 43(1), 108-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.019.
  28. Yoon, K.P. and Hwang, C.L. (1995), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, Sage Publications, London.
  29. Zahedi, F. (1986), "The analytic hierarchy process-a survey of the method and its applications", Interf., 16(4), 96-108. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.16.4.96.

피인용 문헌

  1. Performance evaluation of high-performance fibre-reinforced concrete composite beam-column joint subjected to quasi-static loading vol.21, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00196-0
  2. Synergic Effect of Sugarcane Bagasse Ash Based Cement on High Performance Concrete Properties vol.13, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00832-4
  3. The Comprehensive Identification of Roof Risk in a Fully Mechanized Working Face Using the Cloud Model vol.9, pp.17, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/math9172072
  4. Optimal Selection of High-Performance Concrete for Post-Tensioned Girder Bridge Using Advanced Hybrid MCDA Method vol.14, pp.21, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216553
  5. Comparison of different concrete compositions based on sustainability score vol.14, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2021.1966123