DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Can Sodium Citrate Effectively Improve Olfactory Function in Non-Conductive Olfactory Dysfunction?

Sodium Citrate가 효과적으로 비전도성 후각장애에 치료효과를 보일 수 있을지에 대한 문헌 고찰

  • Kim, Subin (Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kang, Haram (Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Jin, Ho Jun (Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Hwang, Se Hwan (Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 김수빈 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 강하람 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 진호준 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 황세환 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 이비인후과학교실)
  • Received : 2018.11.09
  • Accepted : 2018.12.12
  • Published : 2019.02.25

Abstract

The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature for application of intranasal sodium citrate in the patients with olfactory dysfunction to help determine the sodium citrate treatments for this condition. Two authors independently searched the data base (Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane database) for relevant studies from inception to January 2018. Included studies were randomized controlled studies published in English comparing topical sodium citrate application (treatment group) with saline (control group) in patients who had olfactory dysfunction. Outcomes of interest included the change of olfactory identification and threshold during 2 hours post-treatment. Three studies were enrolled in the meta-analysis. Compared with control group, treatment group did not increase posttreatment score of olfactory identification [standardized mean difference (SMD)=-0.03; 95% confidence interval (CI)=-0.29-0.24; I2=0%] and olfactory threshold (SMD=0.18; 95% CI=-0.09-0.45; I2=0%) significantly. In the degree of pre-post improvement of two outcomes, although treatment group statistically showed the significant improvement in olfactory threshold (SMD=0.30; 95% CI=0.05-0.55; I2=17%), the clinical significance of this outcome was meaningless. Similarly, there was no significant difference in olfactory identification between two groups (SMD=0.17; 95% CI=-0.11-0.45; I2=22%). Unlike the recent favorable results, our summated results presented the uselessness for the local application of sodium citrate in improving patient's olfactory function. However, we also had some limitation such as small sample size and inconsistent application methods. Therefore, larger trials and standardized methodology are needed to reach more stronger and exact results.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2018R1D1A1B07045421).