DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Network Position on the Efficiency of Open Collaboration: A Study of Wikipedia Featured Article Edits

  • Naveed Khan (Business School, Hanyang University) ;
  • Jongwoo Kim (Business School, Hanyang University) ;
  • Hong Joo Lee (Department of Business Administration, Catholic University)
  • Received : 2018.11.05
  • Accepted : 2019.02.07
  • Published : 2019.03.31

Abstract

The success of Wikipedia is due to the large number of volunteers collaborating to provide content to Wikipedia articles. In this paper, we study the effect of network position on the promotion of an article to a featured article. We focus on the edits of featured Wikipedia articles to study the effects of the centrality of editors and centrality of articles on the promotion of featured articles. Considering the editing precedence among editors within an article, editor collaboration networks for a single article are generated using the total English-written featured articles on Wikipedia. In addition, based on the affiliation network of editors and articles, an article-to-article network and an editor-to-editor collaboration network are constructed. Based on the investigation of the networks, we find that article centrality in an article-to-article network has a negative effect on the promotion of an article, and editor centrality in an article-to-article networks has a positive effect on promotion. In addition, editor centrality in an editor-to-editor network has a negative effect on promotion. Some theoretical and managerial implications are provided in view of these results.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017S1A3A2066740).

References

  1. Ahuja, G., Soda, G., and Zaheer, A. (2012). The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science, 23(2), 434-448. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0695
  2. Arazy, O., Nov, O., Patterson, R., and Yeo, L. (2011). Information Quality in Wikipedia: The Effects of Group Composition and Task Conflict. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(4), 71-98. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270403
  3. Belanger, F., and Allport, C. D. (2008). Collaborative technologies in knowledge telework: an exploratory study. Information Systems Journal, 18(1), 101-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00252.x
  4. Borgatti, S. P., and Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991-1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00087-4
  5. Borgatti, S. P., and Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168-1181. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0641
  6. Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349-399. https://doi.org/10.1086/421787
  7. Carte, T., and Chidambaram, L. (2004). A capabilities-based theory of technology deployment in diverse teams: Leapfrogging the pitfalls of diversity and leveraging its potential with collaborative technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(11-12), 448-471. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00060
  8. Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  9. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
  10. Desanctis, G., and Monge, P. (1998). Communication processes for virtual organizations. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(4).
  11. Easley, R. F., Devaraj, S., and Crant, J. M. (2003). Relating collaborative technology use to teamwork quality and performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045747
  12. Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671
  13. Gelman, A., and Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and hierarchical/multilevel models. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
  14. Gibson, C., and Vermeulen, F. (2003). A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 202-239. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556657
  15. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
  16. Grewal, R., Lilien, G. L., and Mallapragada, G. (2006). Location, Location, Location: How network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems. Management Science, 52(7), 1043-1056. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0550
  17. Gulati, R., and Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439-1493. https://doi.org/10.1086/210179
  18. Hansen, M. T. (2002). Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13(3), 232-248. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.232.2771
  19. Harrison, D. A., and Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199-1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586096
  20. Horwitz, S. K., and Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33(6), 987-1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308587
  21. Iba, T., Nemoto, K., Peters, B., and Gloor, P. A. (2010). Analyzing the creative editing behavior of Wikipedia editors: Through dynamic social network analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(4), 6441-6456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.054
  22. Ibarra, H., and Andrews, S. B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(2), 277-303. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393414
  23. Joo, J., and Normatov, I. R. (2012). Relationships between Collective Intelligence Quality, Its Determinants, and Usefulness:A Comparative Study between Wiki Service and Q&A Service in Perspective of Korean Users. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 22(4), 75-99.
  24. Ju, J. O., and Hwang, K. T. (2016). A Study on Sustaining Knowledge Contribution Intention of Participants in the Open Source Software Development Communities. Information Systems Review, 18(3), 111-135. https://doi.org/10.14329/isr.2016.18.3.111
  25. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C., and Wei, K.-K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113-143. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148670
  26. Karna, D., and Ko, I. (2013). Collaboration Orientation, Peer Support and the Mediating Effect of Use of E-collaboration on Research Performance and Satisfaction. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 23(4), 151-175. https://doi.org/10.14329/apjis.2013.23.4.151
  27. Kwon, H., and Kim, J. (2010). User Innovation Empowerment in Open Market Systems: A Case Study on Participatory Game Communities. Information Systems Review, 12(3), 75-88.
  28. Labianca, G., Brass, D. J., and Gray, B. (1998). Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.2307/256897
  29. Menchen-Trevino E., Jha, S., Pathak, M., Sangareddy, S. R. P., Seo, D., and Ye, C. (2009). Wikis in the Classroom: An Agenda for Studying Collaborative Writing in Information Systems Research. Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), 732.
  30. Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373
  31. Payne, G. T., Moore, C. B., Griffis, S. E., Autry, C. W. (2011). Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. Journal of Management, 37(2), 491-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310372413