DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Effect of Win-win Growth Policies on Sustainable Supply Chain and Logistics Management in South Korea

  • KIM, Ki-Hyung (Graduate School of Logistics, Incheon National University) ;
  • SONG, Sang Hwa (Graduate School of Logistics, Incheon National University)
  • Received : 2019.10.27
  • Accepted : 2019.12.05
  • Published : 2019.12.30

Abstract

Purpose: In Korea, win-win growth policy has been successfully implemented in supply chain and logistics management. In the policy, it is recommended to support supply chain partners with various mechanisms including financial and technical aids. This study attempts to scientifically analyze the effects of direct and indirect win-win growth policy factors on supply chain and logistics management performance through partnership factors. Research design, data and methodology: This study builds a structural equation model reflecting the relationship between the win-win growth policy, partnership and performance factors. The proposed model is verified with the PLS (Partial Least Squares regression) methodology. Data from shipper and logistics companies were collected and analyzed by the PLS model. Results: The analysis showed that both direct and indirect policy factors are meaningful to improve supply chain and logistics performance. Indirect support factors including R&D, management innovation, human resources development and educational supports have positive impacts on partnership factors. Direct support factors including financial aids and fairness also have positive impacts on the performance. Conclusions: This study is meaningful in that it suggests a turning point in which supply chain Win-win growth and partnership efforts are perceived as new value-creating mechanism rather than unilateral cost reduction for logistics industry.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, J. C. & Narus A. (1990). A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacture Firm Working Partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54, 42-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400103
  2. Anderson, E., & Weitz B. (1992). The use of pledge to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 18-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172490
  3. Chin, W. W. (1988). Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
  4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  5. Doney, P., & Cannon J. (1997). An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer Seller Relationships Journal of Marketing, 61, 35-51. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251829
  6. Fawcett, S. E., & Magnan, G. M. (2001). Achieving World Class Supply Chain Alignment: Benefits, Barriers, and Bridges. Tempe, AZ: Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies
  7. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error; Algebra and statistics Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
  8. Hahn, Y. N., & Kim, D. H. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Comparison Analysis. The Journal of Business, Economics, and Environmental Studies, 6(4), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.13106/EAJBM.2016.VOL6.NO4.13
  9. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLs SEM: Indeed A Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19, 139-151. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  10. Harland, C. M. (1996). Supply Chain Management: Relationship, Chains, Networks British Journal of Management 7(1), S63-S80.
  11. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as Ecology Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68-78.
  12. Ishaq, M. I., Hussain, N., Khaliq, W., & Waqas, M. (2012). A Review on Triple A Supply Chain Performance. The Journal of Business, Economics, and Environmental Studies, 2 (2), 35-39.
  13. Khan, K. B. (1996). Interdepartmental Integration: A Definition with Implications for Product Development Performance Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(2), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1320137
  14. Kim, T. R., & Song, J. G. (2013). The Effec t of Asset Specificity, Information Sharing, and a Collaborative Environment on Supply Chain Management: An Integrated SCM Performance Formation Model. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(4), 51-60.
  15. Kumar, N., Scheer, L. K., & Steenkamp, J. (1996). The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 348-356. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151986
  16. Kwon, I. W., & Suh, T. W. (2004). Factors Affecting the Level of Trust and commitment in Supply Chain Relationship Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2004.tb00165.x
  17. Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, Communication Behavior and Conflict Resolution Techniques Strategic Management Journal, 15, 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150205
  18. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt S. D. (1994). The Commit ment trust theory of relationship marketing Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302
  19. Nong, N. M. T., & Ho, P. T. (2019), Criteria for Supplier Selection in Textile and Apparel Industry: A Case Study in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Busines, 6 (2), 213-221. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no2.213
  20. Potluri, R. M., Lee, J. W., & Potluri, L. S. (2017), An Exploratory Treatise on Consciousness and Espousal of Halal Supply-Chain: An Indian Perspective. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 4(2), 69-74. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2017.vol4.no2.69
  21. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3, SmartPLS GmbH: Boenningstedt. Retrieved July 1, 2019 from www.smartpls.com
  22. Ryu, C.-S. (2019). How Quick Response affects the Supply Chain Performance. Journal of Distribution Science, 17(9), 5-13. doi: 10.15722/jds.17.9.201909.5
  23. Song, J. -G., & Park, K. -H. (2016). Study on Effect of SCM Performance and ERP Diffusion through Supplier Development Maturity Model. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(5), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.5.201605.71
  24. Spekman, R. E., Kamauff, J. W. Jr., & Myhr, N. (1998). An empirical investigation into supply chain management: A perspective on partnerships. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 28(8), 630-650. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039810247542
  25. Suong, H. T. T. (2017), Factors Impacting on the Supply Chain Collaboration of the Furniture Industry in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 4(4), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2017.VOL4.NO4.67
  26. Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., & Vinzi, V. E. (2004). A Global Goodness-of Fit Index for PLS Structural Equation Modeling, Oral Communication to PLS Club.
  27. Win-win Growth Committee. (2019). Win-win Growth Index. Retrieved July 1, 2019 from http://www.winwingrowth.or.kr
  28. Won, D.-H. (2016). An Analysis on Antecedents Path of Export Performance and Moderating Effects of Social Capital in Materials and Components SMEs. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(2), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.2.201602.135
  29. Zelbst, P. J., Sower, V. E., Green, K. W., & Reyes, P. M (2012). Impact of RFID on manufacturing effectiveness and efficiency. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 32(3), 329-350. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571211212600

Cited by

  1. Adaptive Supply Chain Management under Severe Supply Chain Disruption: Evidence from Indonesia vol.18, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.18.11.202011.91
  2. Cartoon Distribution Environment and Strategies for Sport Webtoon Development vol.11, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13106/jidb.2020.vol11.no11.39
  3. Analyzing the Three Supply Chain Flows in the Maritime Logistics and Distribution Industry vol.18, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.18.12.202012.45
  4. The Impact of Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction on the Performance of the Franchisee vol.19, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.1.202101.17
  5. Food Distribution System in Vietnam: Nash Equilibrium and Channel Choice of Small Scale Farmers vol.19, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.1.202101.61
  6. Economic Ripple Effect of the TKR on the Logistics Industry vol.19, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.3.202103.25
  7. Applying AHP in Evaluation the Distribution Science of Suppliers for Retails in Vietnam: Case of Saigon Co-op Mart vol.19, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.3.202103.35
  8. Collaborative Communication, Information Sharing and Supply Chain Performance vol.12, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13106/jidb.2021.vol12.no5.27