Advances in concrete construction

  • 제7권3호
  • /
  • Pages.131-141
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2287-5301(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-531X(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the effects of vertical mass irregularity on seismic performance of tunnel-form structural system

  • Mohsenian, Vahid (Civil Engineering Department, University of Science and Culture) ;
  • Nikkhoo, Ali (Civil Engineering Department, University of Science and Culture)
  • 투고 : 2018.11.19
  • 심사 : 2019.01.30
  • 발행 : 2019.05.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Irregular distribution of mass in elevation is regarded as a structural irregularity by which the modes with high energy levels are excited and in addition, it can lead the structure to withstanding concentration of nonlinear deformations and consequently, suffer from unpredictable local or global damages. Accordingly, with respect to the lack of knowledge and insight towards the performance of concrete buildings making use of tunnel-form structural system in seismic events, it is of utmost significance to assess seismic vulnerability of such structures involved in vertical mass irregularity. To resolve such a crucial drawback, this papers aims to seismically assess vulnerability of RC tunnel-form buildings considering effects of irregular mass distribution. The results indicate that modal responses are not affected by building's height and patterns of mass distribution in elevation. Moreover, there was no considerable effect observed on the performance levels under DBE and MCE hazard scenarios within different patterns of irregular mass distribution. In conclusion, it appears that necessarily of vertical regularity for tunnel-form buildings, is somehow drastic and conservative at least for the buildings and irregularity patterns studied herein.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ACI Committee 318 (2014), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute.
  2. Al-Ali, A.A.K. and Krawinkler, H. (1998), "Effects of vertical irregularities on seismic behaviour of building structures", Report No. 130, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University San Francisco.
  3. Allouzi, R. and Alkloub, A. (2017), "New nonlinear dynamic response model of squat/-slender flanged/non-flanged reinforced concrete walls", Struct. Concrete, 19(2), 582-596. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201700066
  4. ASCE (2014), Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, ASCE/SEI41-13, American Society of Civil Engineers.
  5. Balkaya, C. and Kalkan, E. (2003), "Estimation of fundamental periods of shear-wall dominant building structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32(7), 985-998. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.258
  6. Balkaya, C. and Kalkan, E. (2003), "Seismic design parameters for shear-wall dominant building structures", The 14th National Congress on Earthquake Engineering, Guanajuato, Mexico, November.
  7. Balkaya, C. and Kalkan, E. (2004), "Relevance of R-factor and fundamental period for seismic design of tunnel-form building", 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, August.
  8. Balkaya, C. and Kalkan, E. (2004), "Seismic vulnerability, behavior and design of tunnel form building structures", Eng. Struct., 26(14), 2081-2099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.005
  9. Balkaya, C., Yuksel, S.B. and Derinoz, O. (2012), "Soil-structure interaction effects on the fundamental periods of the shear-wall dominant buildings", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 21(6), 416-430. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.611
  10. Beheshti-Aval, S.B., Mohsenian, V. and Sadegh-Kouhestani, H. (2018), "Seismic performance-based assessment of tunnel form buildings subjected to near- and far-fault ground motions", Asian J. Civil Eng., 19(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0009-4
  11. BHRCP (2007), Approved Technologies in Direction of Sub-note 2-6, Paragraph "D", Note 6, "A step in direction of building industrialization", First Edition, Building and Housing Research Center Press. (in Persian)
  12. Choi, B.J. (2004), "Hysteretic energy response of steel momentresisting frames with vertical mass irregularities", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 13, 123 -144. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.246
  13. Cimellaro, G.P., Reinhorn, A.M., Bruneau, M. and Rutenberg, A. (2006), "Multi-dimensional fragility of structures: Formulation and evaluation", Multi Disciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER).
  14. Computers and Structures Inc. (CSI) (2015), Structural and Earthquake Engineering Software, ETABS, Extended Three Dimensional Analysis of Building Systems Nonlinear Version 15.2.2, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  15. Computers and Structures Inc. (CSI) (2016), Structural and Earthquake Engineering Software, PERFORM-3D Nonlinear Analysis and Performance Assessment for 3D Structures, Version 6.0.0, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  16. Das, S. and Nau, M. (2003), "Seismic design aspects of vertically irregular reinforced concrete buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 19, 455-477. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1595650
  17. De Stefano, M., Marino, E.M. and Viti, S. (2005), "Evaluation of second order effects on the seismic response of vertically irregular RC framed structures", Proceedings of the 4th European Workshop on the Seismic Behavior of Irregular and Complex Structures, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  18. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K. (1998), "Period formulas for concrete shear wall buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 124(4), 426-433. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:4(426)
  19. Hancock, J., Watson-Lamprey, J., Abrahamson, N.A., Bommer, J.J., Markatis, A., McCoy, E. and Mendis, R. (2006), "An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets", J. Earthq. Eng., 10, 67-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460609350629
  20. Kalkan, E. and Yuksel, S.B. (2007), "Prosand cons of multistory RC tunnel-form (Box-Type) buildings", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 17(3), 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.368
  21. Khalvati, A.H. and Hosseini, M. (2008), "A new methodology to evaluate the seismic risk of electrical power substations", The 14th WCEE, Beijing, China, October.
  22. Khan, A.N. and Javed, M. (2015), "Fundamental principles of earthquake resistant design planning & construction", Lecture Notes, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan, 19, 1-78.
  23. Klasanovic, I., Kraus, I. and Hadzima-Nyarko, M.A. (2014), "Dynamic properties of multistory reinforced concrete tunnelform building - A case study in Osijek, Croatia", Forecast Engineering: Global Climate Change and the Challenge for Built Environment,Weimar, Germany, August.
  24. Lee, L.H., Chang, K.K. and Chun, Y.S. (2000), "Experimental formula for the fundamental period of RC building with shear wall dominant systems", Struct. Des. Tall Build., 9(4), 295-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1794(200009)9:4<295::AID-TAL153>3.0.CO;2-9
  25. Michalis, F., Vamvatsikos, D. and Monolis, P. (2006), "Evaluation of the influence of vertical irregularities on the seismic performance of a nine-storey steel frame", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35, 1489-1509. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.591
  26. Mohsenian, V. (2013), "R-factor determination for tunnel-form buildings", A M.S. Thesis, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran.
  27. Mohsenian, V. and Mortezaei, A. (2018a), "Seismic reliability evaluation of tunnel form (box-type) RC structures under the accidental torsion", Struct. Concrete, 19(6), 1927-1938. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201700276
  28. Mohsenian, V. and Mortezaei, A. (2018b), "Effect of steel coupling beam on the seismic reliability and R-factor of boxtype buildings", Struct. Build., DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.18.00034.
  29. Mohsenian, V. and Mortezaei, A. (2018c), "A new energyabsorbing system for seismic retrofitting of frame structures with slender braces", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 17(5), 2715-2739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-00543-7
  30. Mohsenian, V., Rostamkalaee, S. and S.Moghadam, A. (2018), "Seismic reliability of tunnel form concrete buildings subjected to accidental torsion: A case study", 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  31. NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New and Other Structures, FEMA 450-1 (2003), Edition, Part 1: Provisions.
  32. Paulay, T. and Binney, J.R. (1974), "Diagonally reinforced coupling beams of shear walls", ACI Spec. Publ., 42, 579-598.
  33. Permanent Committee for Revising the Standard 2800 (2014), Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, 4th Edition, Building and Housing Research Center, Tehran, Iran.
  34. Tavafoghi, A. and Eshghi, S. (2008), "Seismic behavior of tunnel form concrete building structures", The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October.
  35. Tavafoghi, A. and Eshghi, S. (2011), "Evaluation of behavior factor of tunnel-form concrete building structures using applied technology council 63", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 22(8), 615-634. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.710
  36. Vinod, K.S., Gregory, A.M. and Brucel, D. (2009), "Determination of structural irregularity limits-mass irregularity example", Bull. NZ Soc. Earthq. Eng., 42, 288-301.
  37. Yuksel, S.B. and Kalkan, E. (2007), "Behavior of tunnel form buildings under quasi-static cyclic lateral loading", Struct. Eng. Mech., 27(1), 99-115. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2007.27.1.099
  38. Zareian, F., Krawinkler, H., Ibarra, L. and Lignos, D. (2010), "Basic concepts and performance measures in prediction of collapse of buildings under earthquake ground motions", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 19, 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.546
  39. Zhao, Z.Z., Kwan, A.K.H. and He, X.G. (2004), "Nonlinear finite element analysis of deep reinforced concrete coupling beams", Eng. Struct., 26(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.08.014