DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the reutilization of used nuclear fuel in a PWR core without reprocessing

  • Received : 2018.07.11
  • Accepted : 2018.09.30
  • Published : 2019.04.25

Abstract

Use of the reconstructed fuel assemblies from partially burnt nuclear fuel pins is analyzed. This reutilization option is a potential candidate technique to make better use of the nuclear resources. Standard two step method is used to calculate node i.e. fuel assembly average burnup and then pin by pin ${\eta}$ values are reconstructed to ascertain the residual reactivity in the used fuel pins. Fuel pins with ${\eta}$ > 1:0 are used to reconstruct to-be-reused fuel assemblies. These reconstructed fuel assemblies are burnt during the cycle 3, 4, 5 and 6 of a 1000 MW PWR core by replacing fresh, once burnt and twice burnt fuel assemblies of the reference core configurations. It is concluded that using reconstructed fuel assemblies for the fresh fuel affect dearly on the cycle length (>50 EFPD) when more than 16 fresh fuel assemblies are replaced. However, this loss is less than 20 days if the number of fresh fuel assemblies is less than eight. For the case of replacing twice burned fuel, cycle length could be increased slightly (10 days or so) provided burnt fuel pins from other reactors were also available. Reactor safety parameters, like axial off set (< ${\pm}10%$), Doppler temperature coefficient (<0), moderator temperature coefficient at HFP (<0) are always satisfied. Though, 2D and 3D pin peaking factors are satisfied (<1:55) and (<2:52) respectively, for the cases using eight or less reconstructed fuel assemblies only.

Keywords

References

  1. Z. Hozer, P. Szabo, B. Somfai, M. Cherubini, Leaking Fuel Impacts and Practices, 2012.
  2. K.C. Okafor, T. Aldemir, Construction of linear empirical core models for pressurized water reactor in-core fuel management, Nucl. Technol. 81 (3) (1988) 381-392. https://doi.org/10.13182/NT88-A16059
  3. A. Hedayat, Developing and analyzing long-term fuel management strategies for an advanced Small Modular PWR, Nucl. Eng. Des. 313 (2017) 190-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.12.015
  4. A.T. Daing, M.H. Kim, Investigation into fuel pin reshuffling options in PWR incore fuel management for enhancement of efficient use of nuclear fuel, Nucl. Eng. Des. 273 (2014) 332-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.03.036
  5. M.D. Carelli, D.T. Ingersoll, Handbook of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors, 2015.
  6. B. Becker, A. Weltz, J.A. Kulisek, J. Thompson, N. Thompson, Y. Danon, Nondestructive assay measurements using the RPI lead slowing-down spectrometer, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 175 (2013) 124-134. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE12-66
  7. S. Scandpower, HELIOS Program, 2005.
  8. S. Scandpower, HELIOS Methods, 2005.
  9. J.J. Yang, "MASTER 3.0 User's Manual, 2004. Daejon.
  10. IAEA-TECDOC-1050, Poolside inspection, repair and reconstitution ofLWR fuel elements, in: Proceedings of a Technical Committee Meeting, 1997, pp. 1-127, no. October.
  11. Remote Technology Applications in Spent Fuel Management, 2005. Vienna.
  12. C. Phillips, P. Cavanah, J. Richardson, The use of passive, secure cells for processing of highly active nuclear wastes, in: 2007 Waste Management Symposium, 2007, pp. 1-15.
  13. C.F.H. Gross, P. Urban, Technical and economic limits to fuel burnup extension, in: Proceedings of a Technical Committee Meeting, 2002, pp. 1-327, no. IAEA-TECDOC-1299.
  14. Nuclear Design and Core Physics Characteristics of the Ulchin Nuclear Power Plant Unit 5 Cycle 1.".
  15. S. Glasstone, A. Sesonske, Nuclear Reactor Engineering, Fourth., Springer US, Boston, MA, 1994.
  16. J.B. Oh, J.H. Gyo, J. JinYang, S.J. Sung, J. Seonggeo, MASTER-3.0: Multi-purpose Analyzer for Static and Transient Effects of Reactors, 2002. Daejon.
  17. Y. Park, M.H. Kim, Improved Retrieval Technique of Pin-wise Composition for Spent Fuel Recycling, 2016, pp. 6-9.
  18. Nuclear Design Report for Ulchin Nuclear Power Plant Unit 5 Cycle 3.".
  19. Nuclear Design Report for Ulchin Nuclear Power Plant Unit 5 Cycle 4.".
  20. Nuclear Design Report for Ulchin Nuclear Power Plant Unit 5 Cycle 5.".
  21. Nuclear Design Report for Ulchin Nuclear Power Plant Unit 5 Cycle 6.".