DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sepsis: Early Recognition and Optimized Treatment

  • Kim, Hwan Il (Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Park, Sunghoon (Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital)
  • Received : 2018.04.29
  • Accepted : 2018.07.20
  • Published : 2019.01.31

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition caused by infection and represents a substantial global health burden. Recent epidemiological studies showed that sepsis mortality rates have decreased, but that the incidence has continued to increase. Although a mortality benefit from early-goal directed therapy (EGDT) in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock was reported in 2001, three subsequent multicenter randomized studies showed no benefits of EGDT versus usual care. Nonetheless, the early administration of antibiotics and intravenous fluids is considered crucial for the treatment of sepsis. In 2016, new sepsis definitions (Sepsis-3) were issued, in which organ failure was emphasized and use of the terms "systemic inflammatory response syndrome" and "severe sepsis" was discouraged. However, early detection of sepsis with timely, appropriate interventions increases the likelihood of survival for patients with sepsis. Also, performance improvement programs have been associated with a significant increase in compliance with the sepsis bundles and a reduction in mortality. To improve sepsis management and reduce its burden, in 2017, the World Health Assembly and World Health Organization adopted a resolution that urged governments and healthcare workers to implement appropriate measures to address sepsis. Sepsis should be considered a medical emergency, and increasing the level of awareness of sepsis is essential.

Keywords

References

  1. Torio CM, Moore BJ. National inpatient hospital costs: the most expensive conditions by payer, 2013. Statistical Brief #204. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2006 [cited 2018 Apr 29]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK368492/.
  2. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med 2001;29:1303-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002
  3. Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012. JAMA 2014;311:1308-16. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.2637
  4. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1546-54. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022139
  5. Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, Friedrich ME, Iwashyna TJ, Phillips GS, et al. Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis. N Engl J Med 2017;376:2235-44. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1703058
  6. Osborn TM. Severe sepsis and septic shock trials (ProCESS, ARISE, ProMISe): what is optimal resuscitation? Crit Care Clin 2017;33:323-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2016.12.004
  7. Pruinelli L, Westra BL, Yadav P, Hoff A, Steinbach M, Kumar V, et al. Delay within the 3-hour surviving sepsis campaign guideline on mortality for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 2018;46:500-5.
  8. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017;43:304-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6
  9. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368-77. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa010307
  10. Lilly CM. The ProCESS trial: a new era of sepsis management. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1750-1. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe1402564
  11. ARISE Investigators; ANZICS Clinical Trials Group, Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, Bellomo R, et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1496-506. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1404380
  12. ProCESS Investigators, Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, Barnato AE, Weissfeld LA, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1683-93. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1401602
  13. Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, Brunkhorst FM, Rea TD, Scherag A, et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:762-74. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0288
  14. Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, Seymour CW, Liu VX, Deutschman CS, et al. Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:775-87. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0289
  15. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 1992;20:864-74. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199206000-00025
  16. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS international sepsis definitions conference. Crit Care Med 2003;31:1250-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000050454.01978.3B
  17. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801-10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287
  18. Gatewood MO, Wemple M, Greco S, Kritek PA, Durvasula R. A quality improvement project to improve early sepsis care in the emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:787-95. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003552
  19. Hayden GE, Tuuri RE, Scott R, Losek JD, Blackshaw AM, Schoenling AJ, et al. Triage sepsis alert and sepsis protocol lower times to fluids and antibiotics in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2016;34:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-6757(15)00975-4
  20. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 1992;101:1644-55. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.101.6.1644
  21. Beesley SJ, Lanspa MJ. Why we need a new definition of sepsis. Ann Transl Med 2015;3:296.
  22. Williams JM, Greenslade JH, McKenzie JV, Chu K, Brown AFT, Lipman J. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, quick sequential organ function assessment, and organ dysfunction: insights from a prospective database of ED patients with infection. Chest 2017;151:586-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.057
  23. Gardner-Thorpe J, Love N, Wrightson J, Walsh S, Keeling N. The value of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) in surgical in-patients: a prospective observational study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006;88:571-5. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588406X130615
  24. Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Meredith P, Schmidt PE, Featherstone PI. The ability of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) to discriminate patients at risk of early cardiac arrest, unanticipated intensive care unit admission, and death. Resuscitation 2013;84:465-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.016
  25. Roney JK, Whitley BE, Maples JC, Futrell LS, Stunkard KA, Long JD. Modified early warning scoring (MEWS): evaluating the evidence for tool inclusion of sepsis screening criteria and impact on mortality and failure to rescue. J Clin Nurs 2015;24:3343-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12952
  26. Stark AP, Maciel RC, Sheppard W, Sacks G, Hines OJ. An early warning score predicts risk of death after in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest in surgical patients. Am Surg 2015;81:916-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481508101001
  27. Al-Qahtani S, Al-Dorzi HM, Tamim HM, Hussain S, Fong L, Taher S, et al. Impact of an intensivist-led multidisciplinary extended rapid response team on hospital-wide cardiopulmonary arrests and mortality. Crit Care Med 2013;41:506-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318271440b
  28. Huh JW, Lim CM, Koh Y, Lee J, Jung YK, Seo HS, et al. Activation of a medical emergency team using an electronic medical recording-based screening system*. Crit Care Med 2014;42:801-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000031
  29. Churpek MM, Snyder A, Han X, Sokol S, Pettit N, Howell MD, et al. Quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and early warning scores for detecting clinical deterioration in infected patients outside the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195:906-11. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201604-0854OC
  30. Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, Harrison DA, Sadique MZ, Grieve RD, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1301-11. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1500896
  31. PRISM Investigators, Rowan KM, Angus DC, Bailey M, Barnato AE, Bellomo R, et al. Early, goal-directed therapy for septic shock: a patient-level meta-analysis. N Engl J Med 2017;376:2223-34. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1701380
  32. Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, Ehrenfeld JM, Wang L, Byrne DW, et al. Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 2018;378:829-39. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1711584
  33. Mitchell KH, Carlbom D, Caldwell E, Leary PJ, Himmelfarb J, Hough CL. Volume overload: prevalence, risk factors, and functional outcome in survivors of septic shock. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015;12:1837-44. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201504-187OC
  34. Walkey AJ, Wiener RS, Lindenauer PK. Utilization patterns and outcomes associated with central venous catheter in septic shock: a population-based study. Crit Care Med 2013;41:1450-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827caa89
  35. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, Monnet X, Anguel N, Richard C, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007;35:64-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000249851.94101.4F
  36. Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 2011;1:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-1-1
  37. Jones AE, Shapiro NI, Trzeciak S, Arnold RC, Claremont HA, Kline JA, et al. Lactate clearance vs central venous oxygen saturation as goals of early sepsis therapy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2010;303:739-46. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.158
  38. Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL. The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med 2004;30:1834-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2233-5
  39. Liu VX, Fielding-Singh V, Greene JD, Baker JM, Iwashyna TJ, Bhattacharya J, et al. The timing of early antibiotics and hospital mortality in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;196:856-63. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201609-1848OC
  40. Bai X, Yu W, Ji W, Lin Z, Tan S, Duan K, et al. Early versus delayed administration of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock. Crit Care 2014;18:532. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0532-y
  41. Asfar P, Meziani F, Hamel JF, Grelon F, Megarbane B, Anguel N, et al. High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1583-93. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1312173
  42. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 2014;40:1795-815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z
  43. DellaVolpe JD, Moore JE, Pinsky MR. Arterial blood pressure and heart rate regulation in shock state. Curr Opin Crit Care 2015;21:376-80. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000239
  44. Dunser MW, Hasibeder WR. Sympathetic overstimulation during critical illness: adverse effects of adrenergic stress. J Intensive Care Med 2009;24:293-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066609340519
  45. Morelli A, Ertmer C, Westphal M, Rehberg S, Kampmeier T, Ligges S, et al. Effect of heart rate control with esmolol on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013;310:1683-91. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.278477
  46. Morelli A, Singer M, Ranieri VM, D'Egidio A, Mascia L, Orecchioni A, et al. Heart rate reduction with esmolol is associated with improved arterial elastance in patients with septic shock: a prospective observational study. Intensive Care Med 2016;42:1528-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4351-2
  47. Majno G. The ancient riddle of sigma eta psi iota sigma (sepsis). J Infect Dis 1991;163:937-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/163.5.937
  48. Reinhart K, Daniels R, Kissoon N, Machado FR, Schachter RD, Finfer S. Recognizing sepsis as a global health priority: a WHO resolution. N Engl J Med 2017;377:414-7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1707170
  49. Just say sepsis! A review of the process of care received by patients with sepsis [Internet]. London: National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death; 2015 [cited 2018 Apr 3]. Available from: http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2015report2/downloads/JustSaySepsis_FullReport.pdf.
  50. Rubulotta FM, Ramsay G, Parker MM, Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Poeze M, et al. An international survey: public awareness and perception of sepsis. Crit Care Med 2009;37:167-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181926883
  51. Vincent JL. Increasing awareness of sepsis: World Sepsis Day. Crit Care 2012;16:152. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11511
  52. Thwaites CL, Lundeg G, Dondorp AM; sepsis in resourcelimited settings-expert consensus recommendations group of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESCICM), the Mahidol-Oxford Research Unit (MORU) in Bangkok, Thailand. Infection management in patients with sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings. Intensive Care Med 2016;42:2117-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4547-5
  53. Schultz MJ, Dunser MW, Dondorp AM, Adhikari NK, Iyer S, Kwizera A, et al. Current challenges in the management of sepsis in ICUs in resource-poor settings and suggestions for the future. Intensive Care Med 2017;43:612-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4750-z
  54. World Sepsis Day [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine; 2018 [cited 2018 Apr 3]. Available from: http://www.ksccm.org/#%2Fboard%2Flist.kin%3Fmenu_main%3D6%26menu_sub%3D29%261522741514642.
  55. Phua J, Koh Y, Du B, Tang YQ, Divatia JV, Tan CC, et al. Management of severe sepsis in patients admitted to Asian intensive care units: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2011;342:d3245. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d3245
  56. Center for Outcome and Resource Evaluation. ANZICS [Internet]. Camberwell: Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society; 2018 [cited 2018 Apr 3]. Available from: http://www.anzics.com.au/Pages/CORE/About-CORE.aspx.
  57. Blot K, Bergs J, Vogelaers D, Blot S, Vandijck D. Prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections through quality improvement interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2014;59:96-105. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu239
  58. Eom JS, Lee MS, Chun HK, Choi HJ, Jung SY, Kim YS, et al. The impact of a ventilator bundle on preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: a multicenter study. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:34-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.06.023
  59. Levy MM, Pronovost PJ, Dellinger RP, Townsend S, Resar RK, Clemmer TP, et al. Sepsis change bundles: converting guidelines into meaningful change in behavior and clinical outcome. Crit Care Med 2004;32(11 Suppl):S595-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000147016.53607.C4
  60. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 2013;41:580-637. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af
  61. Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The surviving sepsis campaign bundle: 2018 update. Crit Care Med 2018;46:997-1000. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003119
  62. Levy MM, Rhodes A, Phillips GS, Townsend SR, Schorr CA, Beale R, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study. Intensive Care Med 2014;40:1623-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3496-0
  63. Chen YC, Chang SC, Pu C, Tang GJ. The impact of nationwide education program on clinical practice in sepsis care and mortality of severe sepsis: a population-based study in Taiwan. PLoS One 2013;8:e77414. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077414
  64. Coba V, Whitmill M, Mooney R, Horst HM, Brandt MM, Digiovine B, et al. Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never. J Intensive Care Med 2011;26:304-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066610392499
  65. Castellanos-Ortega A, Suberviola B, Garcia-Astudillo LA, Ortiz F, Llorca J, Delgado-Rodriguez M. Late compliance with the sepsis resuscitation bundle: impact on mortality. Shock 2011;36:542-47. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0b013e3182360f7c
  66. Kim JH, Hong SK, Kim KC, Lee MG, Lee KM, Jung SS, et al. Influence of full-time intensivist and the nurse-to-patient ratio on the implementation of severe sepsis bundles in Korean intensive care units. J Crit Care 2012;27:414.e11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.03.010

Cited by

  1. 2′-Fluoro-Pyrimidine-Modified RNA Aptamers Specific for Lipopolysaccharide Binding Protein (LBP) vol.19, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123883
  2. Association between Statin Use and Sepsis Risk in Patients with Dementia: A Retrospective Cohort Study vol.16, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091626
  3. Non-faradaic electrochemical impedimetric profiling of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as a dual marker biosensor for early sepsis detection vol.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acax.2019.100029
  4. Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better: Can Aptamers Replace Antibodies in Clinical Diagnostic Applications? vol.24, pp.23, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234377
  5. miRNAs as Biomarkers in Disease: Latest Findings Regarding Their Role in Diagnosis and Prognosis vol.9, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9020276
  6. Resolution of Deep Venous Thrombosis: Proposed Immune Paradigms vol.21, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21062080
  7. Improving the Accuracy of Sepsis Screening by Nurses in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Pilot Interventional Study vol.47, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20210510-01
  8. Antibiotic therapy in sepsis: No next time for a second chance! vol.46, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13403
  9. Failure of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in Pneumonia and Non-Pneumonia Sepsis Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study vol.10, pp.16, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163587
  10. Evidence for the Application of Sepsis Bundles in 2021 vol.42, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1733899
  11. The Knowledge of Nursing Internship Program Students about Early Detection of Sepsis vol.9, pp.t6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7602
  12. Predication of oxygen requirement in COVID-19 patients using dynamic change of inflammatory markers: CRP, hypertension, age, neutrophil and lymphocyte (CHANeL) vol.11, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92418-2