DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Uranium thermochemical cycle used for hydrogen production

  • Chen, Aimei (Center for Excellence in TMSR Energy System, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Liu, Chunxia (Center for Excellence in TMSR Energy System, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Liu, Yuxia (Center for Excellence in TMSR Energy System, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Zhang, Lan (Center for Excellence in TMSR Energy System, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
  • Received : 2018.04.25
  • Accepted : 2018.08.21
  • Published : 2019.02.25

Abstract

Thermochemical cycles have been predominantly used for energy transformation from heat to stored chemical free energy in the form of hydrogen. The thermochemical cycle based on uranium (UTC), proposed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, has been considered as a better alternative compared to other thermochemical cycles mainly due to its safety and high efficiency. UTC process includes three steps, in which only the first step is unique. Hydrogen production apparatus with hectogram reactants was designed in this study. The results showed that high yield hydrogen was obtained, which was determined by drainage method. The results also indicated that the chemical conversion rate of hydrogen production was in direct proportion to the mass of $Na_2CO_3$, while the solid product was $Na_2UO_4$, instead of $Na_2U_2O_7$. Nevertheless the thermochemical cycle used for hydrogen generation can be closed, and chemical compounds used in these processes can also be recycled. So the cycle with $Na_2UO_4$ as its first reaction product has an advantage over the proposed UTC process, attributed to the fast reaction rate and high hydrogen yield in the first reaction step.

Keywords

References

  1. J.E. Funk, R.M. Reinstrom, Energy requirements in the production of hydrogen from water, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 5 (3) (1966) 336-342. https://doi.org/10.1021/i260019a025
  2. J.E. Funk, Thermochemical production of hydrogen via multistage water splitting processes, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 1 (1976) 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3199(76)90007-0
  3. E.A. Fletcher, R.L. Moen, Hydrogen and oxygen from water, Science 197 (1977) 1050-1056. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.197.4308.1050
  4. S. Abanades, P. Charvin, F. Lemont, G. Flamant, Novel two-step SnO2∕SnO water splitting cycle for solar thermochemical production of hydrogen, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33 (2008) 6021-6030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.042
  5. P. Charvin, S. Abanades, G. Flamant, F. Lemort, Two-step water splitting thermochemical cycle based on iron oxide redox pair for solar hydrogen production, Energy 32 (2007) 1124-1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.07.023
  6. G. Beghi, A decade of research on thermochemical hydrogen at the Joint Research Center, Ispra, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 11 (1986) 761-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3199(86)90172-2
  7. L.C. Brown, Nuclear production of hydrogen using thermochemical water splitting cycles, in: Proceedings of the International Congress on Advanced Nuclear Power Plants, Hollywood, Florida, June 13-19, 2002.
  8. G.H. Norman, L.C. Besencruch, L.C. Brown, Thermochemical Water-splitting Cycle, Bench-scale Investigations and Process Engineering, General Atomics Report, 1982. GA-A16713.
  9. J.J. Ferrada, J.L. Collins, Carbonate thermochemical cycle for the production of hydrogen, in: National Hydrogen Association (NHA) Annual Conference. Columbia, South Carolina, March 30-April 3, 2009.
  10. J.L. Collins, L.R. Dole, J.J. Ferrada, C.W. Forsberg, U.S. Patent 7,666,387 B2, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, 2009.
  11. J.E. Kelly, Generation IV International Forum: a decade of progress through international cooperation, Prog. Nucl. Energy 77 (2014) 240-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.02.010
  12. J.G. Arnason, C.N. Pellegri, Depleted and enriched uranium exposure quantified in former factory workers and local residents of NL Industries, Colonie, NY USA, Environ. Res. 150 (2016) 629-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.04.006
  13. D.L. Xie, J.F. Yu, F. Wang, N. Zhang, Hydrogen permeability of PdeAg membrane modules with porous stainless steel substrates, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36 (1) (2011) 1014-1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.10.030
  14. T.L. Ward, T. Dao, Model of hydrogen permeation behavior in palladium membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 153 (1999) 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00256-7
  15. J. Han, I.S. Kim, K.S. Choi, High purity hydrogen generator for on-site hydrogen production, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 27 (2002) 1043-1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00003-4
  16. G.F. Weston, Ultrahigh Vacuum Practice, 1985. Boston.
  17. L. Tian, H.D. Qu, Chemical Engineering Safety Technology, 1984. Beijing, China.
  18. W.M. Shen, Calculation of inert gas consumption for flammable gas displacement, Oil Gas Storage Transp. 15 (1) (1996) 20-22.
  19. L.G. Stonhill, The thermal decomposition of the uranyl and sodium uranyl carbonates, Anal. Chim. Acta 23 (1960) 423-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)81352-0
  20. R. Pankajavalli, V. Chandramouli, S. Anthonysamy, K. Ananthasivan, V. Ganesan, Thermochemical studies on the system Na-U-O, J. Nucl. Mater. 420 (2012) 437-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.10.020
  21. A.L. Smith, J.Y. Colle, P.E. Raison, Thermodynamic investigation of $Na_2U_2O_7$ using Knudsen effusion mass spectrometry and high temperature X-ray diffraction, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 90 (2015) 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2015.06.026
  22. HSC Chemistry V 5.1, Outokumpu Research, Finland, 2002.
  23. A.L. El-Ansary, G.M.A. El-Wahab, E.E. Bayoumi, A.N. El-Said, Purification of Abu-Zenima wet crude yellow cake using alkaline leaching of U(VI), Egyp. J. Petrol. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2017.08.003.
  24. K.M. Wu, Solubility of uranyl ammonium carbonate, Atomic Energy Sci. Technol. 3 (1961) 148-156.
  25. S.J. Jiang, F.Y. Ren, Nuclear Fuel Processing Engineering, 1995. Beijing, China.

Cited by

  1. Thermocatalytic Hydrogen Production Through Decomposition of Methane-A Review vol.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.736801
  2. Numerical investigation of separation efficiency of the cyclone with supercritical fluid-solid flow vol.62, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2021.06.002