Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The use of mobile computing devices in microsurgery

  • Pafitanis, Georgios (Group for Academic Plastic Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London) ;
  • Hadjiandreou, Michalis (Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry) ;
  • Miller, Robert (Group for Academic Plastic Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London) ;
  • Mason, Katrina (Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, University Hospital Lewisham) ;
  • Theodorakopoulou, Evgenia (Department of Plastic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals) ;
  • Sadri, Amir (Department of Plastic Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children) ;
  • Taylor, Kirsten (Department of Plastic Surgery, St. George's Hospital) ;
  • Myers, Simon (Group for Academic Plastic Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London)
  • Received : 2018.02.14
  • Accepted : 2019.02.27
  • Published : 2019.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Mobile computing devices (MCDs), such as smartphones and tablets, are revolutionizing medical practice. These devices are almost universally available and offer a multitude of capabilities, including online features, streaming capabilities, high-quality cameras, and numerous applications. Within the surgical field, MCDs are increasingly being used for simulations. Microsurgery is an expanding field of surgery that presents unique challenges to both trainees and trainers. Simulation-based training and assessment in microsurgery currently play an integral role in the preparation of trainee surgeons in a safe and informative environment. MCDs address these challenges in a novel way by providing valuable adjuncts to microsurgical training, assessment, and clinical practice through low-cost, effective, and widely accessible solutions. Herein, we present a review of the capabilities, accessibility, and relevance of MCDs for technical skills acquisition, training, and clinical microsurgery practice, and consider the possibility of their wider use in the future of microsurgical training and education.

Keywords

References

  1. Chan W, Niranjan N, Ramakrishnan V. Structured assessment of microsurgery skills in the clinical setting. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:1329-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.06.024
  2. Sadideen H, Kneebone R. Practical skills teaching in contemporary surgical education: how can educational theory be applied to promote effective learning? Am J Surg 2012; 204:396-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.12.020
  3. Ghanem AM, Hachach-Haram N, Leung CC, et al. A systematic review of evidence for education and training interventions in microsurgery. Arch Plast Surg 2013;40:312-9. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.4.312
  4. Vargo J. Stanford Microsurgery and Resident Training [Internet]. Top Plastic Surgery Apps, c2017 [cited 2019 Mar 12]. Available from: http://topplasticsurgeryapps.com/2016/07/ 25/stanford-microsurgery-and-resident-training/.
  5. Mosa AS, Yoo I, Sheets L. A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012;12:67. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-67
  6. SciTeMed Publishing Group. A new platform for global microsurgeons [Internet]. Cheyenne, WY: SciTeMed Publishing Group; c2017 [cited 2019 Mar 12]. Available from: https://www.scitemed.com/Press/10/A-new-platform-for-global-microsurgeons.
  7. Hsieh CH, Tsai HH, Yin JW, et al. Teleconsultation with the mobile camera-phone in digital soft-tissue injury: a feasibility study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1776-82. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000142402.07896.21
  8. Perry D, Albert M, Akyurek M. Use of smartphone cameras for simplified and cost-effective video recording of microvascular techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135:941e-943e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001197
  9. Kim DM, Kang JW, Kim JK, et al. Microsurgery training using a smartphone. Microsurgery 2015;35:500-1. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22369
  10. eoSurgical. eoMicro [Internet]. Edinburgh, eoSurgical [cited 2019 Mar 12]. Available from: https://www.eosurgical.com/products/eomicro.
  11. Ghanem AM, Al Omran Y, Shatta B, et al. Anastomosis lapse index (ALI): a validated end product assessment tool for simulation microsurgery training. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016;32:233-41. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1568157
  12. Shah A, Rowlands M, Patel A, et al. Ubersense: using a free video analysis app to evaluate and improve microsurgical skills. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134:338e-339e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000358
  13. Smit JM, Acosta R, Zeebregts CJ, et al. Early reintervention of compromised free flaps improves success rate. Microsurgery 2007;27:612-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20412
  14. Kiranantawat K, Sitpahul N, Taeprasartsit P, et al. The first smartphone application for microsurgery monitoring: SilpaRamanitor. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134:130-9.
  15. Hardwicke JT, Osmani O, Skillman JM. Detection of perforators using smartphone thermal imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:39-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001849

Cited by

  1. Online Resources in Plastic Surgery Education: A Toolbox for Modern Trainees and Plastic Surgeons vol.8, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000002894
  2. Surgical treatment of pressure ulcer: various flaps and other surgical methods vol.64, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2021.64.1.34