Archives of Plastic Surgery

  • 제46권1호
  • /
  • Pages.7-15
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2234-6163(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6171(eISSN)
대한성형외과학회 (Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Breast animation deformity

  • Dyrberg, Diana Lydia (Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense and Lillebaelt Hospital) ;
  • Bille, Camilla (Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital) ;
  • Gunnarsson, Gudjon Leifur (Department of Plastic Surgery, Telemark Hospital) ;
  • Frandsen, Tove Faber (Videncentret, Odense University Hospital) ;
  • Salzberg, C. Andrew (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital) ;
  • Sorensen, Jens Ahm (Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital) ;
  • Thomsen, Jorn Bo (Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense and Lillebaelt Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2018.05.16
  • 심사 : 2018.08.27
  • 발행 : 2019.01.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Breast animation deformity (BAD) has been reported to occur after submuscular implant placement following breast augmentation and immediate breast reconstruction. Despite its apparent impact on patients' quality of life, BAD has only recently become a topic of general concern. Its incidence and etiology have yet to be established. The aim of this systematic review was to identify papers that clearly defined and classified BAD and described how the degree of animation was assessed. We performed a search in PubMed and Embase. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria that described BAD after implant-based breast augmentation or immediate breast reconstruction were included. After screening 866 publications, four studies were included: three describing BAD after breast augmentation and one describing BAD after immediate breast reconstruction. The median percentage of patients with some degree of BAD was 58%. The highest percentages were found in patients operated on using the Regnault technique or the dual-plane technique (73%-78%). The lowest percentages were found following the dual-plane muscle-splitting technique (30%) and the triple-plane technique (33%). We found no studies meeting the inclusion criteria that analyzed BAD after prepectoral implant placement. This review of the current literature suggests that the degree of BAD is proportional to the degree of muscle involvement. Evidence is scarce, and the phenomenon seems to be underreported. Future comparative studies are warranted.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Pelle-Ceravolo M, Del Vescovo A, Bertozzi E, et al. A technique to decrease breast shape deformity during muscle contraction in submuscular augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2004;28:288-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-3023-0
  2. Strasser EJ. Results of subglandular versus subpectoral augmentation over time: one surgeon's observations. Aesthet Surg J 2006;26:45-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2005.11.007
  3. Lesavoy MA, Trussler AP, Dickinson BP. Difficulties with subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty and its correction: the role of subglandular site change in revision aesthetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:363-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c2a4b0
  4. Sbitany H, Piper M, Lentz R. Prepectoral breast reconstruction: a safe alternative to submuscular prosthetic reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:432-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003627
  5. Becker H, Fregosi N. the impact of animation deformity on quality of life in post-mastectomy reconstruction patients. Aesthet Surg J 2017;37:531-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw264
  6. Spear SL, Schwartz J, Dayan JH, et al. Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009;33:44-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9275-y
  7. Becker H, Lind JG 2nd, Hopkins EG. Immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction using a vertical incision. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015;3:e412. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000384
  8. Henriksen TF, Fryzek JP, Holmich LR, et al. Surgical intervention and capsular contracture after breast augmentation: a prospective study of risk factors. Ann Plast Surg 2005;54: 343-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000151459.07978.fa
  9. Spear SL, Bulan EJ, Venturi ML. Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118(7 Suppl):188S-196S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000135945.02642.8B
  10. Nigro LC, Blanchet NP. Animation deformity in postmastectomy implant-based reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017;5:e1407. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001407
  11. Reitsamer R, Peintinger F. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015;68:162-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.10.012
  12. Wallace MS, Wallace AM, Lee J, et al. Pain after breast surgery: a survey of 282 women. Pain 1996;66:195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(96)03064-3
  13. Figus A, Mazzocchi M, Dessy LA, et al. Treatment of muscular contraction deformities with botulinum toxin type A after latissimus dorsi flap and sub-pectoral implant breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62:869-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2007.07.025
  14. Kobraei EM, Cauley R, Gadd M, et al. Avoiding breast animation deformity with pectoralis-sparing subcutaneous direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016;4:e708. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000681
  15. Khan UD. Dynamic breasts: a common complication following partial submuscular augmentation and its correction using the muscle-splitting biplane technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009;33:353-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9320-5
  16. Hammond DC, Schmitt WP, O'Connor EA. Treatment of breast animation deformity in implant-based reconstruction with pocket change to the subcutaneous position. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135:1540-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001277
  17. Egeberg A, Sorensen JA. The impact of breast implant location on the risk of capsular contraction. Ann Plast Surg 2016;77:255-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000227
  18. Banbury J, Yetman R, Lucas A, et al. Prospective analysis of the outcome of subpectoral breast augmentation: sensory changes, muscle function, and body image. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:701-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000101503.94322.C6
  19. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:e1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
  20. Bracaglia R, Tambasco D, Gentileschi S, et al. Triple-plane technique for breast augmentation: solving animation deformities. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013;37:715-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0128-y
  21. Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R, et al. Subfascial breast implant: a new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:904-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000041601.59651.15
  22. Goes JC, Landecker A. Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years of experience with the subfascial plane. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2003;27:178-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-0004-2
  23. Siclovan HR, Jomah JA. Advantages and outcomes in subfascial breast augmentation: a two-year review of experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008;32:426-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9141-y
  24. Lang Stumpfle R, Figueras Pereira-Lima L, Alves Valiati A, et al. Transaxillary muscle-splitting breast augmentation: experience with 160 cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012;36:343-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9830-9
  25. Stoff-Khalili MA, Scholze R, Morgan WR, et al. Subfascial periareolar augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1280-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000135906.48388.22
  26. Pereira LH, Sterodimas A. Transaxillary breast augmentation: a prospective comparison of subglandular, subfascial, and submuscular implant insertion. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009;33:752-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9389-x
  27. Khan UD. Muscle-splitting breast augmentation: a new pocket in a different plane. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2007;31: 553-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0242-1
  28. Gabriel A, Sigalove S, Sigalove NM, et al. Prepectoral revision breast reconstruction for treatment of implant-associated animation deformity: a review of 102 reconstructions. Aesthet Surg J 2018;38:519-26. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx261
  29. Baxter RA. Subfascial breast augmentation: theme and variations. Aesthet Surg J 2005;25:447-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2005.07.006
  30. Khan UD. High transverse capsuloplasty for the correction of malpositioned implants following augmentation mammoplasty in partial submuscular plane. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012;36:590-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9850-5

피인용 문헌

  1. A simple clinical assessment of breast animation deformity following direct-to-implant breast reconstruction vol.46, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.00493
  2. Muscle Splitting Augmentation Mammoplasty: A 13-Year Outcome Analysis of 1511 Primary Augmentation Mammoplasties vol.43, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01468-5
  3. Does Implant Surface Texture Affect the Risk of Capsular Contracture in Subglandular Breast Augmentation and Breast Augmentation-Mastopexy? vol.40, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz241
  4. Correction of an animation deformity that developed from breast implant removal vol.26, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14730/aaps.2020.02152
  5. Prepectoral implant pocket conversion in breast reconstruction vol.26, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2020.08.001