References
- Pelle-Ceravolo M, Del Vescovo A, Bertozzi E, et al. A technique to decrease breast shape deformity during muscle contraction in submuscular augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2004;28:288-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-3023-0
- Strasser EJ. Results of subglandular versus subpectoral augmentation over time: one surgeon's observations. Aesthet Surg J 2006;26:45-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2005.11.007
- Becker H, Fregosi N. The impact of animation deformity on quality of life in post-mastectomy reconstruction patients. Aesthet Surg J 2017;37:531-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw264
- Gabriel A, Sigalove S, Sigalove NM, et al. Prepectoral revision breast reconstruction for treatment of implant-associated animation deformity: a review of 102 reconstructions. Aesthet Surg J 2018;38:519-26. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx261
- Spear SL, Schwartz J, Dayan JH, et al. Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009;33:44-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9275-y
- Dyrberg DL, Bille C, Gunnarsson GL, et al. Breast animation deformity. Arch Plast Surg 2019;46:7-15. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.00479
- Vidya R, Tafazal H, Salem F, et al. Management based on grading of animation deformity following implant-based subpectoral breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2018;45: 185-90. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.01242
- Bertozzi N, Pesce M, Santi P, et al. One-stage immediate breast reconstruction: a concise review. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:6486859.
- Gunnarsson GL, Thomsen JB. Prepectoral hammock and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction in 10 minutes: a focus on technique. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018;6:e1931. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001931
- Kummel S, Kummel A, Hagemann F, et al. Jumping breast phenomenon following subcutaneous mastectomy: first description and grading of a well-known breast deformity. Breast Care (Basel) 2018;13:354-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000489939
- Egeberg A, Sorensen JA. The impact of breast implant location on the risk of capsular contraction. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 77:255-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000227
- Gunnarsson GL, Borsen-Koch M, Wamberg P, et al. How to perform a NAC sparing mastectomy using an ADM and an implant. Gland Surg 2014;3:252-7.
- Dyrberg DL, Bille C, Gunnarsson GL, et al. Visualized pre- and subpectoral implant placement for immediate breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2019;8(Suppl 4):S251-4. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2019.05.09
- Random.org. True random number service [Internet]. Dublin, Randomness and Integrity Services Ltd. [cited 2019 Feb 21]. Available from: https://www.random.org/.
- Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
- Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
- Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, et al. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:1493-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199412013312206
- Fleiss JL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull 1971;76:378-82. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619
- Ibrahim AM, Koolen PG, Ganor O, et al. Does acellular dermal matrix really improve aesthetic outcome in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2015;39:359-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0484-x
- Cheffe MR, Valentini JD, Collares MV, et al. Quantifying dynamic deformity after dual plane breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018;42:716-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-1065-y
- Fracol M, Feld LN, Chiu WK, et al. An overview of animation deformity in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2019;8:95-101. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2018.09.09
- Chandarana MN, Jafferbhoy S, Marla S, et al. Acellular dermal matrix in implant-based immediate breast reconstructions: a comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral approach. Gland Surg 2018;7(Suppl 1):S64-9. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2018.03.05
- Chatterjee A, Nahabedian MY, Gabriel A, et al. Early assessment of post-surgical outcomes with pre-pectoral breast reconstruction: a literature review and meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol 2018;117:1119-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24938
Cited by
- Direct-to-Implant Extracellular Matrix Hammock-based Breast Reconstruction; Prepectoral or Subpectoral? vol.21, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4125-6