DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Selection of Rice Varieties for Production of High Quality Rice in Southern Area of Korea

남부 주요 지역별 고품질 쌀 생산을 위한 적정 품종 선발

  • Seong, Deok-Gyeong (Department of Crop Research, Gyeongnam Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Jin, Young-Min (Department of Crop Research, Gyeongnam Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Kim, Young-Gwang (Department of Crop Research, Gyeongnam Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Joung, Wan-Kyu (Department of Crop Research, Gyeongnam Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Kim, Cheol Soo (Department of Plant Biotechnology, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Chung, Jung-Sung (Department of Agricultural Plant Science(Insti. of Agri. and Life Sci.), Gyeongsang National University)
  • 성덕경 (경상남도 농업기술원 작물연구과) ;
  • 진영민 (경상남도 농업기술원 작물연구과) ;
  • 김영광 (경상남도 농업기술원 작물연구과) ;
  • 정완규 (경상남도 농업기술원 작물연구과) ;
  • 김철수 (전남대학교 식물생명공학부) ;
  • 정정성 (경상대학교 농업식물과학과(농업생명과학연구원))
  • Received : 2016.03.18
  • Accepted : 2019.03.14
  • Published : 2019.04.30

Abstract

This study was carried out to select the rice variety for high quality rice according to reducing N application level (7 kg/10 a) in medium altitude and plain of southern Korea. It was cultivated to seven varieties and ten varieties in medium altitude and plain region respectively in this study. In medium altitude region, the yield of head rice was higher in most varieties except for Borami (526 kg/10 a) than the control variety, Chucheongbyeo (533 kg/10 a). On the other hand, Borami, Gopumbyeo, and onnuri were lower in head rice rate than the other varieties. In addition, Borami and Chucheongbyeo shown a lodging risk but the other varieties were safe against lodging. The milled rice protein content of Chucheongbyeo was 6.1% and the other varieties protein content was similar or lower than that of control except for Borami(6.3%). In plain region, the head rice yield of Nampyeongbyeo (527 kg/10 a) was higher than that of control variety, Ilmibyeo (503 kg/10 a). Head rice rate was lower in Hopumbyoe, Sindongjin, and Chilbobyeo than the other varieties. The varieties contained lower protein content compared Ilmibyeo (6.1%) were Hopumbyeo (5.9%), Jinsumi (6.0%), Sindongjin (5.9%), Chilbobyeo (6.0%), Hwangeumnodeul (5.8%), Hopyeongbyeo (6.0%). Amylose content, whiteness, and palatability (Toyo value) were no significant difference among varieties in two different regions. In conclusion, considering head rice rate, yield of head rice, protein content, lodging resistance, ripening rate and palatability, Pungmi1ho, Saenuri, Chilbobyeo in medium altitude region and Jinsumi, Hwanggumnodul in plain region were selected as proper rice varieties for high quality rice production in southern Korea.

경남의 벼농사 대표 지대인 남부 중간지와 남부 평야지에서 질소 감비(7 kg/10 a)에 의한 고품질 쌀 생산을 위한 품종을 선발하고자 본 연구가 수행되었다. 7품종의 벼를 중간지에서 재배하였고 평야지에서는 10품종의 벼를 재배하여 평가하였다. 중간지에서 완전립의 수량은 보라미(526 kg/10 a)를 제외하고 대부분의 품종이 대조품종인 추청벼(533 kg/10 a)에 비해 높게 나타났다. 반면, 보라미와 고품벼, 온누리는 완전립률이 다른 품종에 비해 낮게 나타났다. 더욱이, 보라미와 대조품종인 추청벼는 도복지수가 다른 품종에 비해 높게 나타났다. 도정된 대조품종인 추청벼의 단백질 함량은 6.1%로 나타났고, 다른 품종들은 대조품종에 비해 비슷하거나 낮게 나타났다. 평야지에서는 남평벼(527 kg/10 a)만이 완전립 수량에서 대조품종인 일미벼(503 kg/10 a)에 비해 높게 나타났다. 그리고 호품벼, 신동진 그리고 칠보벼는 다른 품종들에 비해 완전립 비율이 더 낮게 나타났다. 그러나 호품벼(5.9%)와 진수미(6.0%), 신동진(5.9%), 칠보벼(6.0%), 황금노들(5.8%), 호평벼(6.0%)는 대조품종 일미벼(6.1%)에 비해 단백질 함량이 더 낮게 나타났다. 아밀로오스 함량, 백도, 식미 등은 두 지역에서 품종들 간 유의적 차이는 없었다. 결론적으로 완전립 비율, 완전립 수량, 단백질 함량, 도복 저항성, 등숙률 그리고 식미 등을 고려하면 중간지에서는 풍미1호, 새누리, 칠보벼가 평야지에서는 진수미, 황금노들이 고품질의 쌀을 생산하는데 적합한 품종으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi HC, Hong HC and Nahm BH. 1997. Physicochemical and structural characteristics of grain associated with palatability in japonica rice. Korean J. Breed. 29: 15-27.
  2. Choi KJ, Park TS, Lee CK, Kim JT, Kim JH, Ha KY, Yang YW, Lee CK, Kwak KS, Park HK, Nam JK, Kim JI, Han GJ, Cho YS, Park YH, Han SW, Kim JR, Lee SY, Choi HG, Cho SH, Park HG, Ahn DJ, Joung WK, Han SI, Kim SY, Jang KC, Oh SH, Seo WD, Ra JE, Kim JY and Kang HW. 2011. Effect of temperature during grain filling stage on grain quality and taste of cooked rice in mid-late maturing rice varieties. Korean J. Crop Sci. 56: 404-412. https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2011.56.4.404
  3. Hong HC, Chung CY and Kim KJ. 2004. Palatability assessment. Korean J. Crop Sci. 49: 284-294.
  4. Hong KP, Kim YG, Joung WK, Shon GM, Song GW and Choi YJ. 2003. Adaptation of chlorophyll meter (SPAD meter) technology for N fertilizer management in rice. Gyeongnam Research Report. 37-45.
  5. Juliano BO. 1985. Criteria and test for rice grain qualities. pp. 443-524. In: Rice Chemistry and Technology: Juliano BO (ed). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. St. Paul, MN, USA.
  6. Kang JR, Kim JT, Beg IY and Kim JI. 2005. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer rates on rice quality in Mid-mountainous area. Korean J. Crop Sci. 50: 37-40.
  7. Kim MH, Kim CE and Kang MY. 2012. Comparison of properties affecting the palatability of 33 commercial brands of rice. Korean J. Crop Sci. 57: 301-309. https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2012.57.3.301
  8. Kim SJ, Won JG, Ahn DJ, Park SD and Choi KB. 2006. Effect of n-fertilization on rice growth and quality of milled rice. Korean J. Crop Sci. 51: 67-72.
  9. Kim YS and Jeon CI. 2012. Rice farm management status and implications NHERI Report. 165.
  10. Lee DJ, Kim JH and Kim KS. 2014. Spatiotemporal assessment of the late marginal heading date of rice using climate normal data in Korea. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 16: 316-326. https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2014.16.4.316
  11. Lee JI, Kim K, Shin JC, Kim EH, Lee MH and Oh YJ. 1996. Effects of ripening temperature on quality appearance and chemical quality characteristics of rice grain. J. Agri. Sci. 38: 1-9.
  12. NAAS (National Academy of Agricultural Science). 2010. Fertilization standard of crop. Rural Development Administration. Korea.
  13. NIAST (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology). 2010. Methods of soil chemical analysis. Suwon, Korea.
  14. RDA. 2004. Standard analysis method of agricultural science & technology. pp.1-838.
  15. RDA. 2005. Reaction technology of a free Rice Market. pp.81-83.
  16. RDA. 2006. Advanced technology of rice quality. pp.1-488a.
  17. RDA. 2006. Rice quality improvement plan and top rice press collection. pp.1-235b.
  18. RDA. 2011. High Quality Rice. pp.16-17.
  19. Won JG, Park SG, Ahn DJ and Park SD. 2006. Annual variation of quality in commercial rice produced in Gyeongbuk. Korean J. Crop Sci. 51: 227-232.

Cited by

  1. Economic Effect Analysis according to Introduction of Cutting-type Milling Machine vol.54, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2020.54.2.117