한국측량학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography)

  • 제37권2호
  • /
  • Pages.55-62
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1598-4850(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-260X(eISSN)
한국측량학회 (Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Conjugate Point Extraction for High-Resolution Stereo Satellite Images Orientation

  • Oh, Jae Hong (Dept. of Civil Engineering, Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Lee, Chang No (Dept. of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2019.01.14
  • 심사 : 2019.04.24
  • 발행 : 2019.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The stereo geometry establishment based on the precise sensor modeling is prerequisite for accurate stereo data processing. Ground control points are generally required for the accurate sensor modeling though it is not possible over the area where the accessibility is limited or reference data is not available. For the areas, the relative orientation should be carried out to improve the geometric consistency between the stereo data though it does not improve the absolute positional accuracy. The relative orientation requires conjugate points that are well distributed over the entire image region. Therefore the automatic conjugate point extraction is required because the manual operation is labor-intensive. In this study, we applied the method consisting of the key point extraction, the search space minimization based on the epipolar line, and the rigorous outlier detection based on the RPCs (Rational Polynomial Coefficients) bias compensation modeling. We tested different parameters of window sizes for Kompsat-2 across track stereo data and analyzed the RPCs precision after the bias compensation for the cases whether the epipolar line information is used or not. The experimental results showed that matching outliers were inevitable for the different matching parameterization but they were successfully detected and removed with the rigorous method for sub-pixel level of stereo RPCs precision.

키워드

GCRHBD_2019_v37n2_55_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Flow chart of the study

GCRHBD_2019_v37n2_55_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Search space minimization

GCRHBD_2019_v37n2_55_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Tested Kompsat-2 stereo data and the extracted keypoints (sampled points every 100th)

GCRHBD_2019_v37n2_55_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. The number of matches as the window size increases whether or not using epipolar information

GCRHBD_2019_v37n2_55_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 6. The reprojection error plot as the window size increases for image 1 (a) without epipolar information, (b) with epipolar information

GCRHBD_2019_v37n2_55_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 5. The reprojection accuracy matches as the window size increases. (a) without epipolar information, (b) withe pipolar information

GCRHBD_2019_v37n2_55_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7. Outlier detection as the window size increases.(a) without epipolar information, (b) with epipolar information

GCRHBD_2019_v37n2_55_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 8. The reprojection accuracy after removing outliersas the window size increases (same results for both epipolar cases)

GCRHBD_2019_v37n2_55_f0009.png 이미지

Fig. 9. Extracted conjugate points (blue) and removed outliers (red) case of window size 41 pixels

GCRHBD_2019_v37n2_55_f0010.png 이미지

Fig. 10. Epipolar line before and after RPCs biascompensation (a) a point with epipolar line in #1 image, (b) corresponding epipolar line in #2 image (before RPCs compensation), (c) corresponding epipolar line in #2 image (after RPCs compensation)

Table 1. Specification of tested data

GCRHBD_2019_v37n2_55_t0001.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Baarda, W. (1968), A Testing Procedure for Use in Geodetic Networks, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Publications on Geodesy, New Series, Delft.
  2. de Franchis, C., Meinhardt-Llopis, E., Michel, J., Morel, J.M., and Facciolo, G. (2014), An automatic and modular stereo pipeline for pushbroom images, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 5-7 September 2014, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 49-56.
  3. Fraser, C.S. and Ravanbakhsh, M. (2009), Georeferencing accuracy of GeoEye-1 imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, Vol. 75, No. 6, pp. 634-638.
  4. Ghuffar, S. (2016), Satellite stereo based digital surface model generation using semi global matching in object and image space, ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 12-19 July, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 63-68.
  5. Gong, K. and Fritsch, D. (2017), Relative orientation and modified piecewise epipolar resampling for high resolution satellite images, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 6-9 June 2017, Hannover, Germany, pp. 579-586.
  6. Harris, C. and Stephens, M. (1988), A combined corner and edge detector, Proceedings of the Alvey Vision Conference, 31 August - 2 September 1988, Manchester, United Kingdom, pp. 147-151.
  7. Oh, J.H., Toth, C., and Grejner-Brzezinska, D.A. (2011), Automatic georeferencing of aerial images using stereo highresolution satellite images, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, Vol. 77, No. 11, pp. 1157-1168. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.77.11.1157
  8. Oh, J.H. and Lee, C.N. (2018), Relative orientation of stereo images for epipolar image resampling without any ground control point, The 39 th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, 15-19 October, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  9. Seo, D.C., Yang, J.Y., Lee, D.H., Song, J.H., and Lim, H.S. (2008), Kompsat-2 direct sensor modeling and geometric calibration/validation, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 3-11 July, Beijing, China, Vol. XXXVII, Part B1.