Korean Journal of Community Nutrition (대한지역사회영양학회지)

The Korean Society of Community Nutrition (대한지역사회영양학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Participation Reasons and Deterrents on Welfare Facility Dietitians for the Elderly

노인복지시설 영양·급식관리자의 교육 참여동기 및 저해 요인 분석

  • Kim, Su Jin (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kookmin University) ;
  • Lee, Min A (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kookmin University) ;
  • Cho, Wookyoun (Department of Food and Nutrition, Gachon University) ;
  • Lee, Youngmee (Department of Food and Nutrition, Gachon University) ;
  • Choi, Jiyoung (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kyungnam University) ;
  • Park, Eunju (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kyungnam University)
  • Received : 2019.04.09
  • Accepted : 2019.04.22
  • Published : 2019.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study analyzed the education participation reasons and deterrents of dietitians who work in welfare facilities for the elderly. Methods: The survey was completed by 144 dietitians working at welfare facilities for the elderly in Korea. The survey was conducted in October, 2018, both on-line and off-line, based on the demographic characteristics, work status on welfare facilities for the elderly, Participation Reasons Scale (PRS) and Deterrents to Participation Scale (DPS-G). The data were analyzed using frequency analysis, descriptive analysis, factor analysis, reliability analysis, regressive analysis using SPSS ver. 25.0. Results: The reason for participation were divided into three factors: 'Responsibility of professional and self-development ($5.76{\pm}1.04$)', 'Job stability and personal benefits ($4.98{\pm}1.28$)', and 'Interaction and development of professional competencies ($5.85{\pm}1.00$)'. 'Interaction and development of professional competencies' was the highest motivation factor. Also, the deterrents for participation were divided into four factors: 'Dispositional barrier ($2.70{\pm}1.29$)', 'Dissatisfaction of education usability ($3.39{\pm}1.38$)', 'Institutional barrier ($4.21{\pm}1.45$)', and 'Situational barrier ($2.36{\pm}1.30$)'. 'Institutional barrier' showed the highest deterrents factor. In addition, 'Responsibility of professional and self-development' and 'Interaction and development of professional competencies' were negative attributes for 'Dispositional barrier' (p<0.001). Conclusions: These results provide basic data to promote participation in education and contribute to the improvement of their job ability and education capacity of the food and nutrition management of welfare facilities for the elderly.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of the Interior and Security. Resident population and household status [internet]. Ministry of the Interior and Security; 2018 [cited 2019 Apr 04]. Available from: http://27.101.213.4/#.
  2. Kang HS, Lee YK, Chae IS. Job importance, job performance, and job satisfaction in dietitians at geriatric hospitals or elderly healthcare facilities in Jeju. J Nutr Health 2016; 49(3): 189-200. https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2016.49.3.189
  3. Kim SU. Risk and social conflicts in ultra-low birth rate and super aged society. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2014 Dec. Report No. 2014-22-1-7.
  4. Kim JS. Customized food and meal service for the elderly: Its management and policy implications. Health Welf Forum 2018; 264: 57-69.
  5. Seo EH, Park EJ. Nutrition intake status of the elderly in residential welfare facilities by dietitian employment. J Korea Soc Wellness 2016; 11(4): 473-483. https://doi.org/10.21097/ksw.2016.11.11.4.473
  6. Han GS, Yang EJ. Status of foodservice operations in long-term care facilities for the elderly: Focus on the Gwangju metropolitan city. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2018; 28(5): 337-344. https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2018.8.28.5.337
  7. Hong SY, Seo SH. Job performance frequency and the training needs of dieticians in elderly healthcare facilities. J Korean Diet Assoc 2010; 16(2): 160-177.
  8. Cervero RM. Trends and issues in continuing professional education. New Dir Adult Contin Educ 2000; 2000(86): 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.8601
  9. Sohn CM, Cho YY, Bea MY, Do EK, Na WR, Kim MS. Analysis of reasons for continuing education in dietitians. J Korean Diet Assoc 2013; 19(4): 416-423. https://doi.org/10.14373/JKDA.2013.19.4.416
  10. Murphy C, Cross C, McGuire D. The motivation of nurses to participate in continuing professional education in Ireland. J Eur Ind Train 2006; 30(5): 365-384. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590610677926
  11. Han SM, Lee HS. Nurses' reasons for participation in continuing nursing education. J Hum Resour 2010; 29(2): 189-204.
  12. Houle CO. Continuing learning in the professions. Mobius: A. J Contin Educ Prof Health Sci 1981; 1(1): 76-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.4760010112
  13. Grotelueschen AD. Assessing professionals' reasons for participating in continuing education. New Dir Contin Educ 1985; 27: 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.36719852705
  14. Desilets LD. Assessing registered nurses' reasons for participating in continuing education. J Contin Educ Nurs 1995; 26(5): 202-208. https://doi.org/10.3928/0022-0124-19950901-05
  15. Aucoin JW. The comparison in participation in continuing nursing education between certified and non-certified staff development specialists. [master's thesis]. Louisiana State University Medical Center; 1997.
  16. Hayajneh F. Attitudes of professional Jordanian nurses toward continuing education. J Contin Educ Nurs 2009; 40(1): 43-48. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20090101-07
  17. Han EM. Participation motivation of adult learners in piano education, barriers to their piano education and their educational needs [master's thesis]. Chung-Ang University; 2011.
  18. Chio US. An analytical study on conditions and nature of adult learners' participation for lifelong education. J Lifelong Learning Soc 2006; 2(1): 1-35.
  19. Doray TE. Testing the universality of the generic deterrents to participation scale, Dps-g: a case study [dissertation]. Oklahoma State University; 1990.
  20. Cross KP. Adult learners: Characteristics, needs and interests. In: Peterson RE, editors. Lifelong learning in America. Sanfrancisco: Jossey-Bass; 1979.
  21. Muse CT. Cost benefit analysis, traditional vs. adult students. J Stud Finan Aid 1979; 9(3): 22-27.
  22. Isaac EP. Barriers to adult education participation, distance education, and adult learning. Encycl Info Commun Tech Adult Educ Integr 2011; 1100-1112.
  23. Darkenwald GG, Valentine T. Factor structure of deterrents to public participation in adult education. Adult Educ Q 1985; 35(4): 177-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848185035004001
  24. The Korean Dietetic Association. Education information page [internet]. The Korean Dietetic Association; 2019 [cited 2019 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.dietitian.or.kr/work/education/ke_curefood_info.do.
  25. Shin KE. A study on dietitian's job status at the elderly welfare facilities [master's thesis]. Daejin University; 2007.
  26. Park HH, Lee KW, Kim SO. A study on the participation motivation of clinical nurses in job training. J Digit Converg 2016; 14(8): 319-329. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.8.319
  27. Kwak YS, Han MJ. Study of the job satisfaction and characteristics of dietitians working in the elderly health care facility. J Korean Soc Food Cult 2012; 27(6): 677-685. https://doi.org/10.7318/KJFC/2012.27.6.677
  28. Bae HJ, Lee HY, Chun HJ. An assessment of dietitian job tasks according to the characteristics of foodservice operations and dietitians. Korean J Food Cookery Sci 2007; 23(6): 858-866.
  29. Manning CK, Vickery CE. Disengagement and work constraints are deterrents to participation in continuing professional education among registered dietitians. J Acad Nutr Diet 2000; 100(12): 1540-1542.