Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Development of Reading and Maker Educational Program Centered on Engineering

공학중심 Reading & Maker교육 프로그램 개발

  • Park, Jungho (Dept. of Computer Education, Chinju National University of Education)
  • 박정호 (진주교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Received : 2019.04.22
  • Accepted : 2019.04.25
  • Published : 2019.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The fourth industrial revolution era calls for the ability to solve problems creatively based on basic literacy for technology. These capabilities can be enhanced through the maker education linked to SW education STEM convergence education. Meanwhile, one of the tasks that must be set prior to the maker education is to take an educational approach rather than a tech-centric approach and consider ways to stimulate interest and motivation of the participants. For this purpose, this study developed and applied an engineering-oriented Reading & Maker education program to prospective teachers so that they could participate in active making activities on their own with interest and sympathy rather than simply guiding maker activities. As a result of the study, the results of the maker education recognition survey after the application of the program showed a statistically significant improvement(p<.000).

제4차 산업혁명시대는 테크놀로지에 대한 기초소양을 바탕으로 창의적으로 문제를 해결할 수 있는 역량을 요구하고 있다. 이러한 역량은 SW교육 STEM융합교육과 연계된 메이커교육을 통해 신장시킬 수 있다. 한편 메이커교육에 앞서 선결되어져야 할 과제로는 테크놀로지 중심 접근보다는 교육방법적 접근이 필요하고 참여자의 흥미와 동기를 유발할 수 방안을 고려해야 한다는 것이다. 이러한 취지에서 본 연구는 예비교사를 대상으로 단순히 메이커 활동을 안내하기보다 흥미와 공감을 갖고 스스로 능동적인 메이커 활동에 참여할 수 있도록 공학중심 Reading & Maker 교육프로그램을 개발 및 적용하였다. 연구결과 프로그램 적용 후 메이커 인식조사 결과는 사전검사보다 통계상 유의미한 향상이 나타났다(p<.000).

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. Random House.
  2. Haverson, E., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Education Review, 84(4), 495-505. doi:10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063
  3. Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the Maker Movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), 30-39.
  4. Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. (2014), Invent to Learn : Making, Tinkering, and Engineering in the Classroom(p. 252). Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
  5. Massachusetts Department of Education (2006). Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework. Author.
  6. Moon, D. Y.(2008). The Development of Pre-Engineering Educational Program Model Based on STEM Integration Approach, Journal of Engineering Education Research, 11(2), pp. 90-101. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2008.11.2.90
  7. National Academy of Engineering. (2009). Engineering in K-12 Education. The National Academies Press.
  8. National Research Council (NRC) 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  9. The Next Generation Science Standards(2013), Retrieved from : https://www.nextgenscience.org
  10. Oxford Univ., 2016, Technology at Work v2.0
  11. Papert, S(1988). A. Critique of technocentrism in thinking about the school of the future. In Children in the information age: Opportunities for creativity, innovation and new activities(pp. 3-18). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press
  12. Park, J. H.(2015), Effect of Robotics enhanced inquiry based learning in elementary Science education in South Korea, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 34(1), pp. 71-95.
  13. Peppler, K., Halverson, E., & Kafai, Y. B. (Eds.). (2016). Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments (Vol. 1). London: Routledge.
  14. Portsmore, M.D.(2009), EXPLORING HOW EXPERIENCE WITH PLANNING IMPACTS FIRST GRADE STUDENTS' PLANNING AND SOLUTIONS TO ENGINEERING DESIGN PROBLEMS, A doctoral dissertation, TUFTS UNIVERSITY.
  15. Shim, K. H., Lee, S. W., & Suh, T. W.(2014), Development and Evaluation of a STEAM Curriculum Utilizing Arduino, The Korean Association of Computer Education, 17(4), pp. 23-32.
  16. Stephen, N.(2004). Using Lego as a Tool to Develop Science and Mathematics Understanding Prior to Robotics Study. In Wing, A, Li, K, & White, B (Eds.) Research, Reform, Realise the Potential, 5-8 July 2004, Adelaide, South Australia.
  17. WEF(2016), The Future of Jobs
  18. Wiebe, E.N., Williams, L., Yang, K., & Miller, C. (2003). Computer Science Attitude Survey, (Report No.: NCSU CSC TR-2003-1) Dept. of Computer Science, NC State University, Raleigh, NC.
  19. Wulf. William A. (1998). The Urgency of Engineering Education Reform. Realizing the New Paradigm for Engineering Education. Engineering Foundation Conferences.
  20. Williams, D., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., Lai, G., & Ford, M. (2007). Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inqiuiry skills in a robotics summer camp. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 201- 216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782505

Cited by

  1. 초·중등 학생, 학부모, 교사의 SW 교육에 대한 인식 조사: SW 선도학교를 중심으로 vol.23, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.6.591
  2. The Case Study on Artificial Intelligence Based Maker Education for Pre-Service Teacher vol.21, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2020.21.4.701
  3. Development and Application of a Novel Engineering-Based Maker Education Course for Pre-Service Teachers vol.10, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10050126