DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Gain characteristics of SQUID-based RF amplifiers depending on device parameters

  • Lee, Y.H. (Ultra-low Magnetic Field Team, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science) ;
  • Yu, K.K. (Ultra-low Magnetic Field Team, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science) ;
  • Kim, J.M. (Ultra-low Magnetic Field Team, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science) ;
  • Lee, S.K. (Ultra-low Magnetic Field Team, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science) ;
  • Chong, Y. (Quantum Information Team, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science) ;
  • Oh, S.J. (Center for Axion and Precision Physics Research, Institute for Basic Science) ;
  • Semertzidis, Y.K. (Center for Axion and Precision Physics Research, Institute for Basic Science)
  • Received : 2019.01.19
  • Accepted : 2019.02.07
  • Published : 2019.03.31

Abstract

Radio-frequency (RF) amplifiers based on direct current (DC) superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) have low-noise performance for precision physics experiments. Gain curves of SQUID RF amplifiers depend on several parameters of the SQUID and operation conditions. We are developing SQUID RF amplifiers for application to measure very weak RF signals from ultra-low-temperature high-magnetic-field microwave cavity in axion search experiments. In this study, we designed, fabricated and characterized SQUID RF amplifiers with different SQUID parameters, such as number of input coil turn, shunt resistance value of the junction and coupling capacitance in the input coil, and compared the results.

Keywords

CJJOCB_2019_v21n1_10_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the SQUID RF amplifier with several SQUID parameters. Ls: SQUID inductance, Ic:junction critical current, RJ: junction shunt resistance, CJ:junction capacitance, Cc: coupling capacitance, L:linewidth of input coil line, S: space of input coil line, n:number of turns of input coil.

CJJOCB_2019_v21n1_10_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Design of the DC-SQUID RF amplifier. (a) Overall chip design without cooling fins, (b) chip with cooling fins, and (c) details of the SQUID loop area with a coupling capacitor, input coil, Josephson junctions and shunt resistors.

CJJOCB_2019_v21n1_10_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Typical current-voltage curves of the SQUID. (a) Current-voltage curve with an applied flux near Φ0/2, and (b) current-voltage with an applied flux near Φ0. X-axis is voltage (50 μV/div.) and Y-axis is current (10 μA/div).

CJJOCB_2019_v21n1_10_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Structure of the SQUID package and test probe for I-V curve and gain curve measurements. (a) SQUID package with DC wiring and connector, and (b) structure of the test probe.

CJJOCB_2019_v21n1_10_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. SQUID gain versus RF power level at the SQUID input, where the output of the RF generator (network analyzer) was changed in a step of 5 dBm.

CJJOCB_2019_v21n1_10_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. Gain curves of the SQUID RF amplifiers versus numbers of the input coil turn. (a) 20, (b) 19, (c) 18, (d) 17 and (e) 16 turns. Input coil has 2 μm linewidth and 3 μm space.

CJJOCB_2019_v21n1_10_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7. Gain curves versus shunt resistance of the junction. (a) Shunt resistance of 4, (b) 6 and (c) 8 Ω, respectively.

CJJOCB_2019_v21n1_10_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 8. Change of gain curve depending on the coupling capacitance in the input coil. (a) Coupling capacitance of 0.1, (b) 0.5 and (c) 1.9 pF, respectively. All the three SQUIDs have the same input coil turn number and shunt resistance.

References

  1. S. J. Asztalos et al., "Design and performance of the ADMX SQUID-based microwave receiver", Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A, 656, pp. 39-44, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2011.07.019
  2. S. Michotte, "Qubit dispersive readout scheme with a microstrip superconducting quantum interference device amplifier", Appl. Phys. Lett., 94, pp. 122512-1-3, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3109793
  3. Y. H. Lee, K. K. Yu, J. M. Kim, S. K. Lee, Y. Chong, S. J. Oh, and Y. K. Semertzidis, "Correction of Resonance Frequency for RF amplifiers based on Superconducting Quantum Interference Device", Prog. Supercond. Cryog., 20, pp. 6-10, 2018.
  4. J. Clarke, A. T. Lee, M. Muck and P. L. Richards, "SQUID Voltmeters and Amplifiers", p. 22-115, Chap. 8, in The SQUID Handbook, Eds. J. Clarke and A. I. Braginski, 2006, Wiley-VCH.
  5. J. Clarke, M. Muck, M. Andre, J. Gain and C. Heiden, "The Microstrip DC SQUID Amplifier", p. 473-504, in Microwave Superconductivity, Eds. H. Weinstock and M. Nisenoff, 2001, Kluwer Academic Pub.
  6. M. Muck, and J. Clarke, "The superconducting quantum interference device microstrip amplifier: Computer models", J. Appl. Phys., 88, pp. 6910-6918. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1321026
  7. Y. H. Lee, Y. Chong and Y. K. Semertzidis, "Review of low-noise radio-frequency amplifiers based on superconducting quantum interference device", Prog. Supercond. Cryog., 16, pp. 1-6, 2014.
  8. D. Kinion and J. Clarke, "Microstrip superconducting quantum interference device radio-frequency amplifier: Scattering parameters and input coupling", Appl. Phys. Lett., 92, 172503, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2902173
  9. F. C. Wellstood, C. Urbina and J. Clarke, Hot-electron effects in metals", Phys. Rev. B, 49, pp. 5942-5956, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.5942
  10. Y. H. Lee, J. M. Kim, K. Kim, H. Kwon, K. K. Yu, I. S. Kim and Y. K. Park, "64-channel magnetocardiogram system based on double relaxation oscillation SQUID planar gradiometers", Supercond. Sci. Technol., 19, pp. S284-S288, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/19/5/S25
  11. Y. H. Lee et al., "Development of SQUID-based high-frequency quantum amplifiers", Annual Report, IBS (IBS-R017-D1-2016-a01), 2016.
  12. J. Zeng et al., "High intrinsic noise and absence of hysteresis in superconducting quantum interference devices with large Stewart-McCumber parameter", Appl. Phys. Lett., 103, 042601, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4816730